- Joined
- Dec 2, 2010
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 2
Many MD students I know are getting interviews less than 24 hours after applying. I wanted to know if any DO students out there have had any luck so soon
Last edited:
My roomie is a DO as well and got an offer at MGH. He submitted yesterday.
In what field?
Surgery.
Was this for a categorical spot?
That is very impressive. Good for them.Yes. He's obviously a good applicant - Step1 around 240, great research, and even better letters. A lot of ppl on sdn don't know what they are talking about. Being a DO is of marginal consequence in many specialties (even many of the surgical subspecialties). The reason more DOs don't get invites like this is bc they aren't good applicants. Step 1 is a small part of the equation. Research and especially letters (they need to be strong and from people who matter, not a random community physician) are the difference maker in an application.
There are plenty of statistics that show being a DO in surgical specialties is more than just a marginal consequence.Yes. He's obviously a good applicant - Step1 around 240, great research, and even better letters. A lot of ppl on sdn don't know what they are talking about. Being a DO is of marginal consequence in many specialties (even many of the surgical subspecialties). The reason more DOs don't get invites like this is bc they aren't good applicants. Step 1 is a small part of the equation. Research and especially letters (they need to be strong and from people who matter, not a random community physician) are the difference maker in an application.
Yes. He's obviously a good applicant - Step1 around 240, great research, and even better letters. A lot of ppl on sdn don't know what they are talking about. Being a DO is of marginal consequence in many specialties (even many of the surgical subspecialties). The reason more DOs don't get invites like this is bc they aren't good applicants. Step 1 is a small part of the equation. Research and especially letters (they need to be strong and from people who matter, not a random community physician) are the difference maker in an application.
this part times a million. Majority of my class did jack for their CV during ms1-ms2 summer. IMO, they've already shot themselves in the foot, but the funny thing is: they will be the first to deny this and the loudest to complain when it comes down to applying.The reason more DOs don't get invites like this is bc they aren't good applicants. Step 1 is a small part of the equation. Research and especially letters (they need to be strong and from people who matter, not a random community physician) are the difference maker in an application.
My roomie is a DO as well and got an offer at MGH. He submitted yesterday.
This. Though I'm only in the application process myself, my whole motto through the last 3.5yrs was to be an MD. If you want to compete with MDs for their spots, then be an MD (do what MD students do). Rotate at top hospitals in the country, prove your worth, get a letter. I've noticed a lot of DO students are timid and think they aren't as good as MD students so they don't rotate at large academic places. This couldn't be further from the truth. I haven't met one doctor that A) cared what school I was from, or B)didn't teach me because I was an outsider, or C) treated me differently in any way. Show up, dress well, act smart, don't be annoying, work hard, get letter from dept heads, win.
I call BS. Flat out. I wouldn't believe this unless you sent me an email from Keith Lillemoe himself. Every year since I applied, MGH general surgery has not sent out interview invitations until mid-late October (or even November some years). This is easily verifiable in the surgery sub-forum. They actually usually send out an email stating explicitly that they won't be sending invites until XXX date. And, I 100% guarantee, if they were sending invites - that gunners would be posting left and right in the surgery invite thread.
But wouldn't be a waste to do your rotation at a place that is, most likely, not going to interview you? I"m asking this because, I keep reading and hearing that people usually rotate at programs where they think they will potentially match at.
How would it be a bad thing? If you are a program director and you open a DO kids app and he has 3 fantastic LORs from Department Chairs and program directors at large academic hospitals you won't just turn a blind eye. You will most likely be more impressed than the DO applicant who got 3 LORs from Joe Shmo from community hospital.
I see where you are getting at, though it is very specialty and program dependent. Some places require you to do an away at their program to consider you, some don't.
Everyone and their thought process is different.
I personally chose to do my electives at decent places that I knew might consider me for a residency interview and I have the potential of getting a letter.
I personally wouldn't rotate at a super competitive place that I have no chance of matching in just for the possibility of a letter. Getting a LOR isn't a guarantee depending on who you work with, what the call schedule is like, etc, so I wouldn't put all my eggs in that basket of trying to get a letter from some place that I know I'm not going to possibly match at.
However, every student is different, every specialty operates differently, so I don't think there is one "correct" answer.
then why in "DO-friendly" EM for example (per @sylvanthus ), will only 68% of programs will interview DO students?Being a DO is of marginal consequence in many specialties (even many of the surgical subspecialties). .
Do people think that all programs offer interviews to MD students first?
then why in "DO-friendly" EM for example (per @sylvanthus ), will only 68% of programs will interview DO students?
I call BS. Flat out. I wouldn't believe this unless you sent me an email from Keith Lillemoe himself.
Every year since I applied, MGH general surgery has not sent out interview invitations until mid-late October (or even November some years). This is easily verifiable in the surgery sub-forum.
They actually usually send out an email stating explicitly that they won't be sending invites until XXX date.
And, I 100% guarantee, if they were sending invites - that gunners would be posting left and right in the surgery invite thread.
I was going to say this. Just look at the PD survey where most will not even entertain the idea of interviewing DO.There are plenty of statistics that show being a DO in surgical specialties is more than just a marginal consequence.
I was going to say this. Just look at the PD survey where most will not even entertain the idea of interviewing DO.
I was going to say this. Just look at the PD survey where most will not even entertain the idea of interviewing DO.
Correct me if I'm a wrong (and I may be), but doesnt the PD survey ask if this "program TYPICALLY interviews or ranks DOs"? There are many issues with that survey and it bothers me greatly how much it's quoted. The response rate is pretty poor, and if I'm correct about the above then the survey is essential worthless. I'm sure there are programs that don't typically interview or rank DOs bc DOs don't apply, they don't realize they are DOs, or the ones that apply aren't qualified.
With that said, there are some programs in every specialty with bias.
No, general surgery is among the most well-known "anti" DO fields. One famous chairman said in a meeting "D.O. equals N.O." It's intentional, not coincidental, that these programs don't have any DOs.
It's about right that 50% of programs won't even review their applications. Mine certainly doesn't. DO apps never get looked at. That is way more than marginal consequence. I'm not saying that's right, but it is what it is.
I note you never clarified whether your friend received an MGH interview. (they didn't)
Why your program does not even look at DO applications? Does your program look at US and non US IMG applications?No, general surgery is among the most well-known "anti" DO fields. One famous chairman said in a meeting "D.O. equals N.O." It's intentional, not coincidental, that these programs don't have any DOs.
It's about right that 50% of programs won't even review their applications. Mine certainly doesn't. DO apps never get looked at. That is way more than marginal consequence. I'm not saying that's right, but it is what it is.
I note you never clarified whether your friend received an MGH interview. (they didn't)
Why your program does not even look at DO applications? Does your program look at US and non US IMG applications?
Wow! I guess only applicants from top US schools match into your program...No
Because the program leadership perceives them to be inferior.
My chairman would probably fire my PD if we matched a DO or carib grad.
The truth is probably somewhere between your extreme and mine.
I've always been curious as to why general surgery (and surgical specialties) are like this. What's your take on it?I'm not being extreme. I'm telling you the truth about the challenges to matching into general surgery as a DO. It's a notoriously anti-DO field, worse in particular geographic regions, worse still at the upper tier programs.
My experience in this is backed by the survey data which you are choosing to dismiss.
Whether you accept this to be true or not is not really my problem. I just think it's a consistent problem on this site when DO students/applicants try to undermine the very real challenges they face and put on rose-colored glasses about everything. This is typified by you coming on her to crow that a DO applicant had gotten an MGH invite less than a day after submitting, and saying this was proof of the "marginal consequence" of a DO degree. The states that you cited are actually below average for MGH, even for a top MD grad.
I think it's important for applicants to have a realistic assessment of the competitiveness of the fields they are applying to.
I've always been curious as to why general surgery (and surgical specialties) are like this. What's your take on it?
I'm more curious about why some folks love swimming through the osteopathic forums…I've always been curious as to why general surgery (and surgical specialties) are like this. What's your take on it?
I'm more curious about why some folks love swimming through the osteopathic forums…
Please don't pee in the pool.
I'm more curious about why some folks love swimming through the osteopathic forums…
Please don't pee in the pool.
I mostly think it's a combination of two things, among other contributors:
1) "Old school" mentality that has lingered longer in general surgery than many other fields
2) Because they can. General surgery residencies aren't plastics or derm, but the field is much smaller than many people realize - about a thousand spots per year. The match rate for US MD students is only about 80-85%. They haven't had to look to other options like DO/IMG to fill their slots.
That's kind of a loaded question. He's just one individual, and if he indeed wouldn't be more receptive to a DO residency app in a surgery field, perhaps he would withhold that opinion to avoid some of the more prominent flamers on here. But I don't think he's that type of guy.In all honesty, if one day you become a PD (I'm not sure if you are planning to work in academia), will you carry on this tradition of "D.O. = N.O." and taking IMG's over DO's? I want to get a sense of how things will become in the future.
That's kind of a loaded question. He's just one individual, and if he indeed wouldn't be more receptive to a DO residency app in a surgery field, perhaps he would withhold that opinion to avoid some of the more prominent flamers on here. But I don't think he's that type of guy.
/endrant
I'm not being extreme. I'm telling you the truth about the challenges to matching into general surgery as a DO. It's a notoriously anti-DO field, worse in particular geographic regions, worse still at the upper tier programs.
My experience in this is backed by the survey data which you are choosing to dismiss.
Whether you accept this to be true or not is not really my problem. I just think it's a consistent problem on this site when DO students/applicants try to undermine the very real challenges they face and put on rose-colored glasses about everything. This is typified by you coming on her to crow that a DO applicant had gotten an MGH invite less than a day after submitting, and saying this was proof of the "marginal consequence" of a DO degree. The states that you cited are actually below average for MGH, even for a top MD grad.
I think it's important for applicants to have a realistic assessment of the competitiveness of the fields they are applying to.