- Joined
- Apr 23, 2013
- Messages
- 343
- Reaction score
- 30
Last edited:
Schools (because of limited resources) can only afford to interview enough applicants in any stratum according to their yield in that group. Most schools have enough high stat applicants to fill every interview slot. Depending on historical yield in these groups an algorithm dictates the number of these applicants interviewed.I've frequently heard of very good applicants (GPA 3.8, MCAT 35 +) getting rejected by their in-state schools who want to reject them before the applicant rejects the school for a better offer. Is this true of VCU? I want to apply there in the future and I actually really want to get in…but I'm scared they'll reject me based on my stats even before I get a chance to explain my desire to attend their school Any input?
I've frequently heard of very good applicants (GPA 3.8, MCAT 35 +) getting rejected by their in-state schools who want to reject them before the applicant rejects the school for a better offer. Is this true of VCU? I want to apply there in the future and I actually really want to get in…but I'm scared they'll reject me based on my stats even before I get a chance to explain my desire to attend their school Any input?
In general, AdComm members here recommend that you apply to schools whose median stats are close to your own. Many medical schools do reject high stat applicants. I don't know about VCU in particular.
It's possible, but that doesn't mean 35+ MCATs don't get accepted to VCU. You just have to make a compelling case for why you want to attend there over other schools that may accept you.
In that case, what can one do to maximize their chances at a lower ranked school despite having high stats?
Write convincing secondary essays about your ties to the school?
In that case, what can one do to maximize their chances at a lower ranked school despite having high stats?
In fact, all MD schools reject high stat applicants. For example, if your historical yield of 35+ applicants is 1%, how many weeks of useless interviewing are you willing to do to fill a class? I'm not saying VCU's yield is 1% btw!In general, AdComm members here recommend that you apply to schools whose median stats are close to your own. Many medical schools do reject high stat applicants. I don't know about VCU in particular.
depends on your stats and state of residencyWill I receive the secondaries for sure though?
Will I receive the secondaries for sure though?
How could I know that? You might from some, but you might not for others.
In fact, all MD schools reject high stat applicants. For example, if your historical yield of 35+ applicants is 1%, how many weeks of useless interviewing are you willing to do to fill a class? I'm not saying VCU's yield is 1% btw!
Lol okay I was just wondering if most medical schools were giving out secondaries more easily nowadays
Most send out secondaries to everyone, expecting you to do your research on fit.Lol okay I was just wondering if most medical schools were giving out secondaries more easily nowadays
We know how many interviews we have to offer to matriculate x number of students in each numerical stratum. If you have to interview 100 people with a 35 MCAT to matriculate 1 student and can interview 50 people with 34 a MCAT to yield 5 people, you get much more bang for your resources to focus on the higher yield group (lower MCAT). These yields vary dramatically by school.I'm a little confused…what exactly do you mean by historical yield?
Not exactly. Fit matters. Both in stats and everything else.This is ridiculous. Someone with high stats worried that they will be rejected from "low tier schools"
Just show interest and you are fine wherever.
I've frequently heard of very good applicants (GPA 3.8, MCAT 35 +) getting rejected by their in-state schools who want to reject them before the applicant rejects the school for a better offer. Is this true of VCU? I want to apply there in the future and I actually really want to get in…but I'm scared they'll reject me based on my stats even before I get a chance to explain my desire to attend their school Any input?
Some factors increase yield in each of the strata. State of residence tends to be the strongest. If you interviewed and did not matriculate (or if you did!), you became part of the predictive model for next year's class.I agree with everything said above. For your specific case, I will say that I was invited to interview at VCU and had a 35+ MCAT. Show interest in the secondary and you'll be fine (Though obviously there aren't any guarantees here).
Some factors increase yield in each of the strata. State of residence is the strongest. If you interviewed and did not matriculate (or if you did!), you became part of the predictive model for next year's class.
Is this all done at the pre-ii stage? Or does this also occur post-interview?We know how many interviews we have to offer to matriculate x number of students in each numerical stratum. If you have interview 100 people with 35 MCAT's to matriculate 1 student and can interview 50 people with 34 MCAT's to yield 5 people, you get much more bang for your resources to focus on the higher yield group (lower MCAT). These yields vary dramatically by school.
No. Depending on the school they may decide not to use an interview slot on you this time.so if you received an interview from a school and were low waitlisted can you expect another interview if you are complete much earlier in the cycle and improve application writing?
Interview slots are expensive. This is calculated pre interview. The outcomes from previous years are used to estimate the algorithm for subsequent years.Is this all done at the pre-ii stage? Or does this also occur post-interview?
Thanks, that was what I figured but good to get confirmation.Interview slots are expensive. This is calculated pre interview. The outcomes from previous years are used to estimate the algorithm for subsequent years.
We know how many interviews we have to offer to matriculate x number of students in each numerical stratum. If you haveto interview 100 people with 35 MCAT's to matriculate 1 student and can interview 50 people with 34 MCAT's to yield 5 people, you get much more bang for your resources to focus on the higher yield group (lower MCAT). These yields vary dramatically by school.
If you are a school with enough resources to interview 500 people and the dean wants a median MCAT of 35, your algorithm will be quite different from a mission based school that wants to fill the class with like-minded individuals that can break 200 on Step 1. The algorithm varies dramatically by school. That's why you have to look for numerical fit as well as mission fit.what are the general boundaries for each stratum?
Write convincing secondary essays about your ties to the school?
I've never found this type of essay useful. None of the answers, however heartfelt, are predictive.The thing about this, though, is that many schools don't have secondary essays and many more are asking specific questions that don't give you the option to explain your specific interest in the school.
Do you see much of a use for secondaries beyond making people pay to weed down the number of applicants to review? It seems like some schools are moving to an optional only essay, and Mayo iirc just makes you pay a fee, nothing more.I've never found this type of essay useful. None of the answers, however heartfelt are predictive.
Imo unless you have some strong ties to that school (IS tuition, close family/w.e), I think early decision can really make you miss out on schools you may enjoy much more. Personally I know that there were some schools that I interviewed at that I thought I wouldn't like too much but ended up loving and similarly, some great on paper schools that I was less than impressed with after visiting. Also I didn't know exactly what I wanted out of a school until I was able to visit a few different ones to see what I liked vs. disliked and what fit me the best.That's why I'm thankful for early decision... Even though most of you all despise it (from what I've seen). If you want to show them you mean business with a high GPA and MCAT, then consider early decision.
That's why I'm thankful for early decision... Even though most of you all despise it (from what I've seen). If you want to show them you mean business with a high GPA and MCAT, then consider early decision.
Most secondaries are pretty useless. Their small added value lies in the fact that even those who pay to have their PS massaged into perfection often write their own answers to secondaries, allowing a small peek into their actual experience and motivations.Do you see much of a use for secondaries beyond making people pay to weed down the number of applicants to review? It seems like some schools are moving to an optional only essay, and Mayo iirc just makes you pay a fee, nothing more.
EDP is only for those willing to put themselves at a significant disadvantage everywhere but one school. That's why it should only be undertaken by those who have been given a strong endorsement of their candidacy by that school.I agree with HCHopeful. ED is the best way to show your interest
Imo unless you have some strong ties to that school (IS tuition, close family/w.e), I think early decision can really make you miss out on schools you may enjoy much more. Personally I know that there were some schools that I interviewed at that I thought I wouldn't like too much but ended up loving and similarly, some great on paper schools that I was less than impressed with after visiting. Also I didn't know exactly what I wanted out of a school until I was able to visit a few different ones to see what I liked vs. disliked and what fit me the best.
Most secondaries are pretty useless. Their small added value lies in the fact that even those who pay to have their PS massaged into perfection often write their own answers to secondaries, allowing a small peek into their actual experience and motivations.
I've frequently heard of very good applicants (GPA 3.8, MCAT 35 +) getting rejected by their in-state schools who want to reject them before the applicant rejects the school for a better offer. Is this true of VCU? I want to apply there in the future and I actually really want to get in…but I'm scared they'll reject me based on my stats even before I get a chance to explain my desire to attend their school Any input?
If the dean at VCU accepts cold calls from applicants he/she has a completely different approach to admissions compared to any I know!Ah the humble brag.
I knew multiple people with >/= 35 MCATs who went to VCU... and this is when MCAT scores were lower and a 35 actually meant something. The lowish average is not because they don't have strong candidates, it is because they also accept people who have borderline stats because they think that those people will make good doctors.
If you are interested, all you need to do is send the dean a quick e-mail that says, "I am very interested in VCU because of X, Y and Z and hope that you guys interview me." It shows intent. If you are really interested, a meeting with the dean would be a nice touch. Now if they don't interview you despite touching base with the dean, you probably have some red flags or deficiencies on your application (like no volunteering, a murder conviction, you know the like)
If the dean at VCU accepts cold calls from applicants he/she has a completely different approach to admissions compared to any I know!
I do not intend to convey contempt nor imply contempt on behalf of others. Rather, with thousands of applicants to every school, the presumption of specialness exhibited by bypassing the usual routes of communication is not often met warmly!I know you've said repeatedly that you believe schools have something approaching outright contempt.
While I'm only one applicant in one cycle, I can say with some degree of certainty that my doing this (direct email to dean just after being put under consideration) almost certainly resulted in two IIs to elite schools and one blazingly fast rejection to a mid-tier school. In sum: you just don't know who's gonna like what.
I've frequently heard of very good applicants (GPA 3.8, MCAT 35 +) getting rejected by their in-state schools who want to reject them before the applicant rejects the school for a better offer. Is this true of VCU? I want to apply there in the future and I actually really want to get in…but I'm scared they'll reject me based on my stats even before I get a chance to explain my desire to attend their school Any input?
How can you know what was responsible for the IIs? Correlation vs causation.I know you've said repeatedly that you believe schools have something approaching outright contempt.
While I'm only one applicant in one cycle, I can say with some degree of certainty that my doing this (direct email to dean just after being put under consideration) almost certainly resulted in two IIs to elite schools and one blazingly fast rejection to a mid-tier school. In sum: you just don't know who's gonna like what.
I've frequently heard of very good applicants (GPA 3.8, MCAT 35 +) getting rejected by their in-state schools who want to reject them before the applicant rejects the school for a better offer. Is this true of VCU? I want to apply there in the future and I actually really want to get in…but I'm scared they'll reject me based on my stats even before I get a chance to explain my desire to attend their school Any input?