To be clear, NAN is an excellent organization and puts on a great conference--I've attended several times. However, I find INS to be more research-oriented, which is more in line with my training/career goals.
NAN is great is you need CE's. Being in the VA, not a problem, plus I like the more research oriented talks at INS and have many more former friends and colleagues that go to that conference to catch up with.
I primarily go to INS because the topic areas of recent conferences have been more to my liking, and I know more people who attend it vs. NAN. Although I agree that as a practice organization, NAN is great.
I really want to make it to AACN one of these days, as they also look to have great talks. I just always forget to request the time off in advance.
I like NAN and think they put on a quality conference, though it's been a few years since I've attended.
I prefer INS because the topics are a bit more hard-sciencey.
I have yet to get to AACN, but it looks great. Between the presentation topics and the annual bar gathering of list serv members…it's can't miss conferencing. One of these years...
Yep. I usually have to choose one per year, and INS wins out because I know more folks there. I've been to NAN a few times in the past and enjoyed it, though. And the shift to a single registration fee for open access to all CE sessions is appealing.
This site uses cookies to help personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and terms of service.