- Joined
- Jul 14, 2004
- Messages
- 886
- Reaction score
- 8
Geezer99 said:You are a perfect example of why OEC is absolutely necessary to advance the field of orthodontics. For you to hold this view, you must not consider ortho as a field of health care at all. Please leave your desire to make alot of money, and your condescending attitude that you somehow deserve more money because you got into ortho, out of this argument. Agaex pretty much killed all legitimate arguments against OEC in this forum (Way to go!), and now all that are left are greedy concerns that orthodontists might not make as much money in the future. OEC is going to introduce competition, and yes, this will hurt those orthodontists that do not innovate and change to remain competitive. The ultimate winner is the consumer, with orthodontics becoming more readily available and affordable.
Okay, if this were true (which part of may be... so I am not COMPLETELY discrediting your statements) then let's consider the following:
Problem: There are too few dentists graduating and too many dying/retiring dentists in the USA!
Solution: Let's create an independent hygiene practitioner program, that way, many of the hygienists can practice right next door to us, charge almost the same fees, and the patients can receive treatment in restorative care, extractions, and oh yeah, let's not forget cleanings.
Problem: As a (ficticious report) released last week, scientists have proven that whitening your teeth is a medical necessity, and in denying patients the right to whiten, it harms the entire population.
Solution: Dentists charge too much for whitening, so let's allow anybody to set up a kiosk at your local Target to take impressions, send to laboratories that do not require degrees to take orders, and allow them to independently sell to the public. Oh yeah, let's set the price at $29.99 for a custom tray with whitening material because it allows for 2% profit.
Problem: Public surveys of the hygienists that have been allowed to open independent practices and provide restorative care show they are opening most of their practices in wealthy, urban areas near other dentists. Many hygienists are doing cosmetic cases of restorative care and not focusing on hygiene in underserved rural areas.
Solution: Politicians and their intimate knowledge of dentistry conclude that the ONLY way to fix this is to then allow dental assistant practitioner programs and allow them to independently practice assisting and provide provisional restorations for everybody at the local airport.
Okay, enough ranting... my point?
It's happened in medicine, the PA/NP/CRNA programs that popped up because of the "disparity in access to care" has created a situation where doctors are consistently seen less valuable and thus fees/compensation goes down.
What it all comes down to is $$$ and stature. Other groups want a piece (Hygienists/NP/PAs) but it comes down to the organizations (ADA/AGD) to put a stop to these demands.
OEC programs are a stepping stone towards this scenario. The capitalistic idea of OEC programs promoting increased supply to supplant the increased demand is somewhat interesting in concept. I don't think, however, that the programs represent the best for the integrity of the profession of dentistry. Focusing on the "consumer" in dentistry rather than the "patient" can be a slippery slope. The more the profession allows others to regulate/kick us around the more we will give up. Go ADA!
OEC is in relatively uncharted waters... to my knowledge, I do not know of a residency system in medicine that works in this fashion. Will keep my attention towards the programs and see what happens.