- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 2
Registration opens up sometime today so I thought I'd go ahead and make this thread. Anyone else taking it in August?
Is anyone else terrified for CARS? it could go so many ways for me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, the curve depends on all the scores. If the average scores are low, then many people's scores would go up. But since many of us late test takers have been studying for some time, chances are that our average scores are higher, so the curve doesn't work much in our favor. But then there are always rumors and speculations in SDN that are not true in the real world.What's this about a harder curve????????
Feel the exact same way...just want the exam to be over! Writing Aug 6. I took EK 1-4.That moment where you start off C/P being your best and 4 days out from your exam you realized you've bumped up everything else but have failed to pay much attention to that section lol.
I cannot wait to be done with this and do nothing for 2 days. How do the August 5/6 test takers feel? Anyone do EK FL 1-3?
Hey, I just took the AAMC sample test. Can someone convert these scores... @Dreamstoo ?
Chem/Phys- 53%
CARS- 85%
Bio/Biochem- 63%
Psych/Soch- 78%
123 C/P
130 CARS
125 B/B
127 P/S
total: 505. Just bring up that C/P. you're good
o wow, I'm an idiot. I think I've been doing the whole mcatjelly score conversion wrong. So pretty much she's equating an 11 to a 129 and a 12 to a 130?
So, if I re-did my score: 86%,64%,83%,85%--> would that technically be a 130,125,129-130,130?=514-515ish?
Yeah. I personally disagree with her Bio scale. It's way too rough. To me, an 8 is equivalent to a 125 not a 124.
How are you doing these conversions? I never got/saw the mcatjelly conversion sheet?
And also, do we have any indication that these conversions are still accurate ?
Feel the exact same way...just want the exam to be over! Writing Aug 6. I took EK 1-4.
o wow, I'm an idiot. I think I've been doing the whole mcatjelly score conversion wrong. So pretty much she's equating an 11 to a 129 and a 12 to a 130?
So, if I re-did my score: 86%,64%,83%,85%--> would that technically be a 130,125,129-130,130?=514-515ish?
Well, the curve depends on all the scores. If the average scores are low, then many people's scores would go up. But since many of us late test takers have been studying for some time, chances are that our average scores are higher, so the curve doesn't work much in our favor. But then there are always rumors and speculations in SDN that are not true in the real world.
Yep, the chem phys sections were brutal on 1-3. Got like a 51% on EK 3 I think. Averages for 1 and 2 were mid 60s and I believe I hit an 88% on the fourth since it was less tricky. I'm grateful for those exams though -- I think they've made me a little better at deciphering harder passages!Does the P/C section seem really difficult for you as well? On the AAMC material I was performing the best on it (80%) but EK's is for some reason causing me more trouble than the other sections.
haha well according to the wise words of Ellie Goulding..."anything could happen!"
MCAT pump-up jams 2015:
but in all seriousness, I think I've given up studying...Probably just gonna chill for the next couple days. Cannot wait to get this exam out of the way, and hopefully set all my MCAT books aflame.
Yeah. I personally disagree with her Bio scale. It's way too rough. To me, an 8 is equivalent to a 125 not a 124.
So if an 8 is a 124 on that scale, does that make a 126 a 10? Or a really high 9?
Lmao I was about to say I've been so good about not procrastinating all summer and the taste of freedom at the end of this week has hit me with a procrastination level over 9000. I gotta just start studying, i still have physics and CARS 2 q packs and KA to review and then I'm going to rest on Wednesday before test day.
Personally I think 125 is an 8 and 126 would be a 9. 127 is a 10. That's what I assume the scale will be like.
I agree, but I meant according to that spreadsheet.
THIS. I feel like my entire score rides on how I perform on this section. At this point if I just capitalize on the sciences and somehow walk away with a 126+ on CARS on the real thing I will be ecstatic!
Apparently, AAMC also claims that the earlier test takers this year may have gotten a more lenient curve/higher scores than those at the end of the year... I don't get how that works. We are still guinea pigs of this exam... it's less than 4 months old.
I don't think we should be as afraid of CARS considering 7% of test takers get a 12 and above (129+), whereas only 2% of test takers would on the old exam. They've made it not impossible to get a 13-15 and so scores should move up slightly accordingly.
"We recognize that the first test takers on the new exam may be different from test takers who sit for the exam later in the year. It is possible that early test takers will be higher scoring than those who test later. We also recognize that 2015 may be an unusual testing year."
I don't think this implies anything about the curve.
I too had problems understanding this. The problem with that is that it says that the "binding" decreases not increases. the explanation for this wasn't clear, so I really didn't get what the table meant especially when it referred to K0 as the binding constant "in the absence of metal". I was thinking maybe Ka in this sense maybe meant the equilibrium "with the metal" and that since it was really large I thought that maybe that equated to more dissociation or less binding, whereas the Ka/K0 ratio (without metal), meant a decreased Ka equilibrium constant and more binding in the absence of the metal.
I guess do you treat K0 as the binding constant vs. K0 as the affinity constant as separate things?
Yeah they're different.
Think of a river flowing slowly vs squirting a water gun. The river has a higher flow rate because there's a lot more volume being displaced per second. The water gun has a higher velocity because the water is being squirted faster.
Yeah. I personally disagree with her Bio scale. It's way too rough. To me, an 8 is equivalent to a 125 not a 124.
"We recognize that the first test takers on the new exam may be different from test takers who sit for the exam later in the year. It is possible that early test takers will be higher scoring than those who test later. We also recognize that 2015 may be an unusual testing year."
I don't think this implies anything about the curve.
Could someone explain why #11 on the C/P OG is R,R?
Isn't a 125 around a 50th percentile, so shouldn't that be more around a 7 on the old scale?
Is there anyway to see your 'liked' posts on SDN? You guys say such helpful things and I like them thinking I can refer to them later but it doesn't seem like I can unless I search through the thread
I can't study anymore... it feels as if my mind has used up all of its energy.... can august 6th be tomorrow already?
I can't study anymore... it feels as if my mind has used up all of its energy.... can august 6th be tomorrow already?
Me right now. Taking a break because I was struggling to process even the most basic info.Burnt out crew checking in