- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 695
- Reaction score
- 498
There is a projected job GROWTH of 41k pharmacists, with... say 141k new pharmacists. But the figure of 14% growth does not account for pharmacists that go into retirement, this figure is simply the number of new positions that will be available. So in the next 10 years 100k pharmacists need to retire for supply to meet demand. There are currently around 300k pharmacists in the USA. So in the next 10 years 1/3 of them would need to retire. For supply to meet demand.
Though this may or may not happen, the severity of this situation was overstated in your post.
This isn't to mention the idea that pharmacists could end up handling warfarin tests/managing diabetics/etc potentially creating even more jobs. Chains will certainly push this if they can bill for it.
You aren't even exaggerating for some schools! Wasn't there one in California that charged $73,000 per year without living expenses? After living expenses especially in expensive California, easily can hit $100K per year. Good luck paying back those loans in an unpredictable job market.
Chains might push these things but they won't provide any extra help to get them done. This goes back to the mandate of putting pharmacists on salaried wages and making them do extra work for free on their off-time.