- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 7,579
- Reaction score
- 6,795
Yup, what a different world we'd all live in if the VA charged fees for late cx or no shows.
I honestly don't think it's ease of attendance for the most part. I really do think it boils down to zero accountability on the patient's part. They can generally no-show as much as they want with minimal backlash. The total number of no shows in my clinical practice over the past 3 years in my private practice is less than what I would generally get in a few weeks at the VA. And, of those no-shows, one was hospitalized the night before, and one literally died, so in essence I've only had one actual no show in 3 years.
That's a good point - we also may see the more severe patients, as presumably those who are functioning better have employment and private health insurance options.
That's a good point - we also may see the more severe patients, as presumably those who are functioning better have employment and private health insurance options.
Don't know about your VA, but engaging in measurement based care is an item on our performance eval.I'm very pro measurement based care in principle but too often anti measurement based care in practice for reasons exactly like this.
Here lately, I feel people in my clinic are more likely to show for in-person. I think its a motivation factor if they chose in-person. IDK though. My VVC clinic has a very high missed opportunity percentage compared to my in-person clinics.Even with VA no show rates, you would think the attendance rate would be better when the bar is set as pickup your phone and click a button.
Not sure if this applies to any of your populations, but my no-show rate for telehealth on freeze/snow days is often more about kids being home.
Uh oh, I'm not having this issue.What is with this new Teams update or something that won't automatically change my emoticons into emojis? This may sound dumb but it's REALLY cramping my style
Uh oh, I'm not having this issue.
They will probably revoke my GIF privileges at some point. I have a knack for finding the very unhinged ones.
I suspect the loan servicers should have a method of submitting documents for them to complete electronically or via fax.Anyone here navigate the edrp application process? Doing it now and the loan verification forms seem like they'll be a pain to get from Nelnet and Navient, two well known terribly run organizations. anyone have any tips for that?
it looks more painful than it is. Nelnet responded to my email request within one week. They sent me the completed forms in a nondescript envelope about one week after that.Anyone here navigate the edrp application process? Doing it now and the loan verification forms seem like they'll be a pain to get from Nelnet and Navient, two well known terribly run organizations. anyone have any tips for that?
Do you happen to have a good email for Nelnet? Just want to make sure I'm not sending my request into a black holeit looks more painful than it is. Nelnet responded to my email request within one week. They sent me the completed forms in a nondescript envelope about one week after that.
i recommend that you withhold your SSN until the last step for security reasons.
To add to this, PHQ9 doesn't even specifically query SI. It asks:Not me racing to cancel the BHL Touch administration for my patient who late cancelled, otherwise they'll report their chronic SI on the PHQ-9 and I'll have to try to reach them via phone
yeah, its not the most fun process, and there are too many forms and processes to go through, but companies like Nelnet are used to getting these forms, and downloading your payment history is surprisingly easy with them. My first year of EDRP went much smoother than I expected.Anyone here navigate the edrp application process? Doing it now and the loan verification forms seem like they'll be a pain to get from Nelnet and Navient, two well known terribly run organizations. anyone have any tips for that?
That moment when you have a vvc appointment and you don't want to call a patient before the 15 minute no show mark, but in meetings it is emphasized that missed opportunities are a big concern. *SIGH*.
How is that a missed opportunity?? It's the patient's responsibility to show up on time.
I usually call 5 min into VVC but there are patients I don't call anymore because I'm sick of chasing them.
I have no clue, but if an appt is cancelled DURING the scheduled time or no shown, the beancounters count that as a "missed opportunity" and it looks bad.How is that a missed opportunity?? It's the patient's responsibility to show up on time.
I have no clue, but if an appt is cancelled DURING the scheduled time or no shown, the beancounters count that as a "missed opportunity" and it looks bad.
We are having this exact same discussion right now so national guideline on no-shows/cancels has changed at some point recently, including suggestions on what to do to increase productivity when this happens (like sending secure messages with workload credit to other patients - lol).I have no clue, but if an appt is cancelled DURING the scheduled time or no shown, the beancounters count that as a "missed opportunity" and it looks bad.
Man I'm at like 110% productivity. We are just going to catch up on things if someone no shows/cancels.We are having this exact same discussion right now so national guideline on no-shows/cancels has changed at some point recently, including suggestions on what to do to increase productivity when this happens (like sending secure messages with workload credit to other patients - lol).
Yeah, it's a weird article because a lot of their policy critiques are a function of CPRS limitations or just a (I'll be generous) misinterpretations of policy. Ex: we definitely still track biological sex in the chart and the clinical reminders default to biological sex. In additional to biological sex, self-identified sexual identity is also tracked. We use both. It would be more helpful if there were more clinical reminder options, but that's not a thing yet. I haven't worked with Cerner, so I can't speak about that.Have you all seen this article?
It is an opinion piece against gender identity in patient care within the VA.
Clickbait-ey headline? Check.Have you all seen this article?
It is an opinion piece against gender identity in patient care within the VA.
its TERFY bull****, embarrassing to have been written by licensed psychologists, and very clearly violates the APA code of ethics.Have you all seen this article?
It is an opinion piece against gender identity in patient care within the VA.
its TERFY bull****, embarrassing to have been written by licensed psychologists, and very clearly violates the APA code of ethics.
Unlike some, I do think there should be space for good faith discussions about trade-offs, inclusive gender care with traumatized populations and the like, but this op-ed is not that.
5.04 Media Presentations - particularly inaccurate statements about sex and gender/not based in evidence and out of line with the APA guidelines for practice with transgender individualsActual codes, or perhaps the aspirational guidelines in a certain light?
5.04 Media Presentations - particularly inaccurate statements about sex and gender/not based in evidence and out of line with the APA guidelines for practice with transgender individuals
And
3.03 Other Harassment
Psychologists do not knowingly engage in behavior that is harassing or demeaning to persons with whom they interact in their work based on factors such as those persons' age, gender, gender identity, race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability, language, or socioeconomic status.
I didn't see that statement, would you be willing to share it?I'm more curious if VA will do anything. There was a statement on Friday, but I didn't have the energy to read it.
I'm more curious if VA will do anything. There was a statement on Friday, but I didn't have the energy to read it.
Yeah I'm not finding anything yet. Two of my colleagues contacted national. I'll update you all if I find anything.It might be on the LGBTQ national side of things. I'm not sure if VA proper has said anything.
Sorry, it's in the Teams chat for VCCs.Yeah I'm not finding anything yet. Two of my colleagues contacted national. I'll update you all if I find anything.
I had the first 2 items memorized so I could just include them in my normal interview when asking about any recent SI/HI. Definitely saved some time and aggravation.TFTW when you realize you've memorized certain items on the Columbia.
I had the first 2 items memorized so I could just include them in my normal interview when asking about any recent SI/HI. Definitely saved some time and aggravation.
I usually administer it through MHA and waiting for that to open takes SO LONG. It's way easier when you can just recite the first two items and the last one (last if they don't need the additional questions)
Yeah, I also had some printed copies available in my testing office that came in handy, especially if either of the first two questions was positive. Otherwise, I'd ask the questions I had memorized during the course of my interview, and would then pull up the note for it afterward while completing my regular appointment note.I have a printed copy that is my go to for this reason.
I wish other types of providers would stop recommending psychological approaches to my clients. I'm not defensive about feedback, but come to me first.
I thought it was a psychological approach. I looked up the acronym to verify. They want me to tap meridian points on my Veteran to induce a calmer state.