dre said:
so for those of you who could've pursued a lifestyle specialty (derm, rads, ophtho, etc.) and chose IM instead . . . what made the difference for you?
In spite of your request for comments from people who chose IM, I think all of the responses so far are from people outside of the specialty.
I considered IM, EM and GS, and I think they are all great choices. I liked diagnosing undifferentiated patients in the ED and dealing with acute issues, but I found it frustrating when patients were admitted and I was no longer part of their care. I also enjoyed GS, using my hands, and focusing on specific problems, but I found it frustrating when I had to defer my patients' other medical issues. Also, in EM and GS, you have limited practice options.
The great thing about IM is its breadth and versatility. You are a master diagnostician, often involving complex adult patient presentations with multiple organ systems. You are an expert in a variety of procedures (especially in Card, GI, Hospitalist, Intensivist). You can have long-term relationships with your patients (Primary Care) or short-term relationships (Hospitalist, Subspecialist). You can directly manage your patients' care (Primary Care, Hospitalist, Intensivist) or you can be a consultant (Subspecialist, IM consultant to other specialties). You also deal with issues of wellness and prevention, as well as treating diseases.
There are a wide variety of practice models. The scope of practice involves treating patients in the clinic, hospital ward, intensive care unit, hospice, the patient's own home, or a nursing home. You can be the primary physician for your patients (Primary Care) or you can seek patients by referrals (Subspecialist). You can work in direct patient care, you can work in academic medicine (teacher, researcher), or you can be a consultant in the private sector (pharmaceuticals, biomedical engineering, medical informatics). The
www.ACPOnline.org has a continuing series on practice models for IM.
There are also a wide variety of business models, some of which offer you a significant amount of autonomy. You can work as a solo physician, as part of a physician group, as an employee of a corporate entitity, or as a consultant. You can accept a large number of patients or you can set up a boutique practice. You can set your own hours in private practice or you can do shift work as a hospitalist. You can work in the private sector and have no patients at all. You can accept insurance payments or you can set up a cash-only practice.
For me, IM was a great choice. I plan to practice and also be involved in medical informatics (
www.amia.org). Of course, IM isn't for everyone. But if you're interested, you might want to check out the following organizations.
PM me if you want to talk about anything in detail.