Originally posted by Blade28
Iserson recommends scheduling interviews late (end of January or in February), that way you'll be memorable, as well as the fact that they have tougher grading schemes early on (the rationale being, the interviewers want to leave some leeway for potentially better applicants later on).
Any truth to this?
This is very controversial... and I don't know the answer... but one thing that I know for sure, is that a good number of programs keep a running list of applicants that they plan to rank. Thus, it is somewhat easier to get on this list if you are among the first to be interviewed. Additionally, once the list is full, it is easier for them to NOT add a person to the list than to drop a person already on the list. I heard this from a chief resident who was involved in the process (not surgical).
But, I have also heard that some programs assign a numerical score to each applicant, then at rank time they all sit down and make a preliminary rank list based on the score, then move people around on the list based on each interviewer's opinions. Therefore in this case it is to your advantage to be remembered better by whoever interviewed you.
Yet another issue is that your first interviews will invariably be the most awkward, since you will have the least amount of experience with interviewing with surgeons. After about 5 interviews you become a pro. However, nearer to the end, I remember being so freakin sick of interviews, and I couldn't pull off faking enthusiasm, etc.
Therefore, back when I interviewed, I put a few "safety programs" at the very front, and scheduled everything else somewhat randomly, but tried to put my top choices somewhere in the middle. Like someone else mentioned, if you could get some insider info from a resident, you could be much more strategic about things.