- Joined
- Oct 25, 2007
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Pre-Medical


Not to start a flame war....but I've always wondered by GBLTIQA always included the T. Considering T involves choosing to have it loped off...whereas being gay is a natural occurrence.
I would like to share stories of GLBT students applying this year, include or exclude GLBT orientation in your application, and your perception of the schools about GLBT environment after the interview. Allies are welcome. Thanks.
Our pre-health advisor suggested only being out if it is relevant to your med school application. As in, if you identify as GLBT but haven't done any extracurriculars and / or it hasn't influenced you wanting to become a doctor, there is no reason to mention it and it's hard to find an appropriate way to do so. However, if you have done lots of activism work, or volunteered/worked at an LGBT clinic, or anything like that, it is definitely relevant and shouldn't be left off of your application. For instance i was an officer for my school's undergrad LGBT organization, the pride alliance, so i included this. I did peer education to help stop homophobia on my campus, and included that. i did work-study at the LGBT center. I also have done some medically related thigns in this field such as petitioning the red cross to allow gay men to donate blood, and have been strongly impacted by transgendered and gay patients i have had who reported being refused health care because people did not understand them. These are all things that enhance an application, so leaving them off may hurt you as an applicant. Also, includign these activities could make one just a strong ally to the community; i never wrote about dating women, or being queer, just abotu working within the community.twilightcitysky, I have heard conflicting suggestions about being out in applications. Most healthcare practitioners I talked to suggested to not be out in application. I have decided to not mention GLBT in my application so they can get to know me as a person rather than a 'gay' person. For MA, I am applying to Harvard. Would be interesting to see what you experience with UMass being that MA is leading the states in offering equality in marriage.
Transgender is often used as an umbrella term for people who feel that they were born the wrong gender, or feel that they do not fit within the two gender options as they are normally defined. Not all transgender people decide to transition, some choose to remain in the bodies they were born. Others wish to transition but cannot afford it, while still others go through partial or full transitions, including hormones only, or hormones and surgery. A transitioned patient is known as a transexual, a specific term which falls under the larger umbrella of transgendered.Does T specifically refer to postop ppl? I didn't know that was the case, or that you needed to have surgery to be transgender?
You're quite welcome. Hahaha since someone broke up the pattern of me posting continuously, lol i will include one public service announcement:aaj117, you rock GIRL!! Congrats. Thanks for posting your experience. 🙂
Just to toss in my 2 cents, from some notable schools I looked into last year.
UMichigan: A great and accepting school for LGBTQI students, but the scene in the town kind of stinks.
Baylor: School and students are more or less open-minded and accepting, but the city itself has a good gay district.
Emory: The school and students seem more accepting than at Baylor, and the city is considered the gay mecca of the south.
WashU: I was told by the diversity director "I think we have a gay student or something." Oooh, bad sign. The city is in the heart of the bread basket and isolated as hell too.
Duke: The school is liberal and open-minded (The dean of admissions is gay himself), but the area is not, and very isolating.
Penn (I'm a little biased here): Incredibly liberal and understanding city, with a great gay scene. The mayor himself recently officialized this citiy's "gayborhood" by giving it rainbow street signs. The school is also incredibly open to LGBTQI students (the university has a 25 year old LGBTQI center). All in all though, we don't have a whole lotta gay students, dedinitely under 10 per class, but I think we're underrrepresented almost everywhere (except for Yale, of course).
As far as being out on your application, I wasn't, but I didn't have any inolvement with any LGBTQI groups in college, so it wasn't really relevant (do people "out" themselves as straight in their applications or interviews?) If you choose to be out in the application process, it would be a good test to make sure you end up in a place were they really want all of you, not just a selective part of your being. That being said, there definitely are some folks out there in the very conservative field of medicine who aren't as open-minded and may hold it against you in an interview, even though they aren't supposed to (and we're a freaking protected class under the law now).
P.S. aaj117, let us know about that website. Sounds like a great project.
well, i'd say that we include the T because gender identity, like sexual identity, isn't really a preference. people who are transgender often report never feeling comfortable with their body and have surgery to reconcile that.
as far as the application process, i've been out through the whole process and while i only have two interview invites, i don't think it's affected my application. one interview is at UVM and the other at UTHSCSA, so definitely opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. i decided that i wanted to be out on my application because i felt that my process of coming out played a huge role in my decision to apply to medical school and is definitely part of who i want to be as a physician.
FWIW, UTHSC SA is not on the other end of the ideological spectrum. While it could be argued that Texas is typically conservative, I feel that UTHSC SA is open to diversity and I know it is quite friendly to non-trads so I wouldn't see why it wouldn't be just as friendly to GLBT.

!!!I definitely am. When i was at Georgetown they were talking about how a lot of students track patient populations for their research project and there were programs in place to track pt pops of elderly, certain minorities, and i asked if we could do a pop that didn't have a program in place yet. ms sullivan looked into it for me while i was interviewing and pretty much guaranteed that they'd be able to find me a mentor and help set it up and i was really really excited. i am especially interested in working wtih transgendered patients as these patients often don't have access to healthcare, especially physicians who are knowledgeable about trans issues and don't make them feel ashamed or stigmatized.Hey everyone! (I'm bumping up the thread)
Is anyone considering working with the GLBTQI community as a physician? I think it'd be cool to work at callen-lorde or somewhere similar.
!!!
Hi! Yay i've wanted to start a thread like this for a while. I guess i just identify as queer because I think that sexuality is fluid and don't want to weigh myself down with a definite label, but if i have to i go with Bi. I have been out in the application process, very out at some schools. I discussed this with my pre-health advisor, and he strongly suggested i be out because i have so much leadership experience with LGBT groups from my time as an undergrad, and i'm really glad i did it, because like he said i wouldn't really be comfortable at a school that rejected me for it. I spoke with the heads of admissions for Penn and Harvard, and they also both recommended me being out in applications because of my experiences, and who's going to argue wtih them? SO i did it. While my AMCAS included the majority of my LGBT activism work and activities, on some applications i also chose to write about it on secondaries. At tufts i wrote about it in my diversity essay, at howard and morehouse i wrote about the LGBT (especially T) community as an underserved community that i would like to make more visible at my time in medical school, and in Brown's essay i did the same thing, writing about my best attribute being my ability to advocate for and communicate with others, and how i chose to apply to brown becuase they were the first University to include gender identity in their non-discrimination clause and i believe they're still the only medical school to include it. I have interviews at all of these schools, and already have acceptances from two, so I am sure that it did not hurt me.
Also, my undergraduate institution's pre-health advisor is working to make a website for LGBT students applying to medical school, just kind of an advice thing on whether or not to be out, what schools were more or less friendly about it, where students do or don't feel comfortable when they enter med school, etc. If anyone has any experiences that they wouldn't mind being on that website, please note it at the bottom of your post for me so i can let him know? Thanks so much guys!
It totally depends on the individual. Some are offended by that word, others prefer it. At this point, there is no word for it that can't be taken as offensive. Every day people say "that's so gay" to indicate that they dislike something, queer used to be the derogatory term, then it became ***, and i'm pretty sure that the only reasons there are so many names and identifications is because every time people find one that they aren't offended by, the general public turns it offensive by tone and usage. Anyway, getting down from my soapbox, like i said some people love it some people hate it. I prefer it because it doesn't indicate my sexuality and i don't have to directly define myself; Sometimes i go months, even years, only attracted to one gender, but then later it changes. Sometimes i'm not sure if i identify as bisexual, straight, or a lesbian. Sometimes i get angry that i should have to identify as one instead of just being a person...people see me dating a girl and get confused and ask "what are you then?" as though who you're attracted to can't change over time or you have to be defined for them to accept you. Queer is kind of a way to erradicate that feeling of a definition, for some people. I know plenty of heterosexual people who identify as queer because they are strong allies, and they also don't like that people are so defined by their sexuality. So, it's a word that means a lot of different things to a lot of different people, and that's why i like it.I have seen this on the board a few times now, and have wanted to know ... is 'queer' the preferred term?? It sounds a little harsh to me (but I am a heterosexual male) so I was just wondering??
I definitely am. When i was at Georgetown they were talking about how a lot of students track patient populations for their research project and there were programs in place to track pt pops of elderly, certain minorities, and i asked if we could do a pop that didn't have a program in place yet. ms sullivan looked into it for me while i was interviewing and pretty much guaranteed that they'd be able to find me a mentor and help set it up and i was really really excited. i am especially interested in working wtih transgendered patients as these patients often don't have access to healthcare, especially physicians who are knowledgeable about trans issues and don't make them feel ashamed or stigmatized.
WashU: I was told by the diversity director "I think we have a gay student or something." Oooh, bad sign. The city is in the heart of the bread basket and isolated as hell too.
Hey everyone!
Is anyone considering working with the GLBTQ community as a physician? I think it'd be cool to work at callen-lorde or somewhere similar.
!!!
Hey everyone!
Is anyone considering working with the GLBTQ community as a physician? I think it'd be cool to work at callen-lorde or somewhere similar.
!!!
🙄i hear URM LGBT students get an acceptance to Harvard Med automatically.
Hello.
LGBT is not URM for the purpose of application to medical school.
Whether or not LGBT status will be considered favorably seems like a crapshoot depending on the school and admissions team. Case in point: I was rejected pre-sec from EVMS but not UCSF. I speculate part of the reason why is that the people at UCSF are more knowledgable and more welcoming. Here's another example. At an interview, I was essentially made fun of by the woman for being T. Another guy at the same school thought I was really courageous.
Here's my advice: if your status as LGBT has been a major part of your life definitely write that down. You don't want to go to a school that won't accept you. I want to work with low income trans people so of course I wrote about what it's like to grow up with a lot of [medical and other] discrimination and how it made me want to be a doctor to help this population.
I kind of think trans people should be considered URM because I know of only 1 or 2 trans doctors in the whole world - not that many. Also there is a huge shortage of medical care for this population. If it were up to me, we would be URM, but that is just not the case.
I really hope medical schools look at not just race though. Of course I support affirmative action for URMs but they also need to look at SES and try to gauge the actual level of adversity one has faced. At least in my case, I have to believe my background is a plus because I am a very unique applicant. My personal comments essay is probably nothing like any other they are going to read this year. At the very least I will probably stand out and leave an impression. I also have a really strong motivation to pursue medicine, and it's not "Daddy wants me to be a doctor."
Hope this answers your question.
Hello.
LGBT is not URM for the purpose of application to medical school.
Whether or not LGBT status will be considered favorably seems like a crapshoot depending on the school and admissions team. Case in point: I was rejected pre-sec from EVMS but not UCSF. I speculate part of the reason why is that the people at UCSF are more knowledgable and more welcoming. Here's another example. At an interview, I was essentially made fun of by the woman for being T. Another guy at the same school thought I was really courageous.
Here's my advice: if your status as LGBT has been a major part of your life definitely write that down. You don't want to go to a school that won't accept you. I want to work with low income trans people so of course I wrote about what it's like to grow up with a lot of [medical and other] discrimination and how it made me want to be a doctor to help this population.
I kind of think trans people should be considered URM because I know of only 1 or 2 trans doctors in the whole world - not that many. Also there is a huge shortage of medical care for this population. If it were up to me, we would be URM, but that is just not the case.
I really hope medical schools look at not just race though. Of course I support affirmative action for URMs but they also need to look at SES and try to gauge the actual level of adversity one has faced. At least in my case, I have to believe my background is a plus because I am a very unique applicant. My personal comments essay is probably nothing like any other they are going to read this year. At the very least I will probably stand out and leave an impression. I also have a really strong motivation to pursue medicine, and it's not "Daddy wants me to be a doctor."
Hope this answers your question.