Ahh, Deuce, you wanna spar some more? I thought your were knocked out by now. You're such a tough guy!
Why even go threw all of this when given the choice? If in fact you where even given the choice. I'll tell you this I wouldn't want to go through 4 years of med school and a residency, to only explain my degree to some patient to equate me w/ a "oh a chiroparctor."
First of all, I was given a choice. Yes, I was once one of those crazy premeds who chose to take the road less travelled, I chose a D.O. school over M.D. school. I can fax you the acceptance letters if you dont believe me. Why did I do this? Because I believe in the product. It's not that I didnt believe in the MD product, I just believed in the D.O. product more. The philosophy of osteopathic medicine, whether you believe D.O.s employ it or not in practice, is more harmonious with the attitude of the american public towards health care. Americans are sick of being drugged and treated as a mere slice of data in a double-blinded placebo study. D.O.s have the best of both worlds, they can offer a frustrated patient more choices yet have the traditional system of medicine to fall back on. Is there a problem with that? Are more choices of treatment bad? Why are more hours of education for doctors harmful? D.O.s read the same, if not more, books, train at the same hospitals, on the same patients, yet, on paper, learn more. Prove to me how that doesnt help a patient and I'll declare you the winner.
The decision I made goes deeper than wanting to learn OMM. I actually spend alot of time these days trying to disprove OMM to myself, and that's how science works. Whether or not all of OMM is efficacious, and beyond its benefits of basic science and biomechanics reinforcement, it urges a medical student to open their mind to other possibilities of healing and to develop critical thinking skills in order to prove or disprove a theory. From my experience, the M.D. model doesnt allow this thought process. From a broad perspective, M.D.s are more closed-minded doctors, often suffering from tunnel vision. Your very posts in this forum prove that. They seem to automatically dispute anything with the words "alternative or complimentary" on it, yet their patients don't. Whether or not these alternative treatments work, D.O.s, as a byproduct of their education model, are usually more willing to at least investigate and learn about the treatment while not refuting it outright, because once again, patients dont. Last year in the U.S., more people purchased a herbal drug than purchased a prescription drug. This tells you that the patient population is drifting away from the traditional tide of medicine to one including more self-responsibility of health and experimentation. They now need to demand their physicians are trained in these alternative therapies, not so much as to offer them, but at least to understand how these alternative therapies interact with traditional modalities... whether or not the alternative method has been proven in JAMA.
Before you label me as a tree-hugging liberal who has his herbs lined up in the medicine cabinet, please believe I am not. I am about as conservative as they come. I was first urged into osteopathic medicine about 4 years ago by a friend of my family, an MD actually. He's a soon-to-be General, is a director of trauma for the Army in the Southeastern Asian theatre, and was just accepted to the astronaut class of 2008. He relayed the same argument to me that I just relayed to you. He doesnt have anything against MDs or their philosophy, he's ivy league trained. He just sees the direction the pulse of medicine is going over the next 20 years and he's witnessed D.O.s to have just as much knowledge in the traditional sense, plus a bit of a refreshingly different outlook on life. His analogy was "Pizza is good, but pizza with pepperoni is even better". D.O.s have all the ingedients in quality, now they just need the quantity. This will happen, albeit slowly. The AOA is organized, much more so than the AMA if one analyzes the two groups closely, and they're hell bent on providing those numbers over the next 20 years. D.O.s will never outnumber MDs, so no, there will never be a WebDO, but D.O.s will offer the U.S. more of a judicious system of checks and balances in efficient and effective healthcare implementation. They apparently already have by the fierce hatred and disregard you seem to have for the profession, so I guess we're doing our jobs.
Anyway, this dissertation is the reason why, since given the choice, I gladly traded off having to explain what a D.O. means for, IMO, a more complete training and the ability to practice medicine how I want to practice it. I wasnt in it for the glamour. Some of the above may have been broad generalizations, but that's how people often chose a doctor, or a medical school for that matter.
Your success as a physician at your retirement party is not determined by the letters after your name but by the depth of your ability to help and heal. If you dont believe this, plan for an early retirement party.
Sorry for the length. Enough for now. Back to ACLS.