- Joined
- May 9, 2001
- Messages
- 126
- Reaction score
- 1
great post!bnichols0330 said:
bnichols0330 said:No problem, I just wanted to share it b/c I thought it was hilarious.
impetigo said:Anyone have a single page version of this or can anyone condense it to one page? Just curious.
stinkycheese said:This is property of Michelle Au. You shouldn't hand out the comics without her permission. They are for sale on her website,
http://theunderweardrawer.homestead.com/scutmonkey.html
wolferman said:Usually I don't make it a habit of copyright infringement, but if you actually take the time to go to Michelle's site (which you obviously have not recently), you will see that the book is currently sold out. If anything, by making SINGLE printout and showing it to my friends in med school, I've increased awareness of the Scutmonkey comic and thus her potential sales (assuming she ever gets more in stock).
-wolferman
P.S. I removed the link from my site to pacify stinkycheese, but also because it was using up all my free bandwidth. Buy the book. It's funny.
stinkycheese said:And also, the last time I checked, copyrights don't just go away when something is sold out.
wolferman said:Printing a single copy, as I did, for the purposes of "comment" and/or "criticism" does not constitute an infringement of copyright.
stinkycheese said:This is property of Michelle Au. You shouldn't hand out the comics without her permission. They are for sale on her website
stinkycheese said:I'm not interested in arguing about mp3's or anything else, nor am I a fan of the argument, "it doesn't matter because it happens all the time", my only interest in this thread is to point out that this is property of Michelle Au and that should be respected. Bitch and moan all you want about copyright law; I could care less. I'm not on some copyright crusade. I am concerned about Michelle getting appropriate credit/payment for her work. END OF STORY.
stinkycheese said:I'm not interested in arguing about mp3's or anything else, nor am I a fan of the argument, "it doesn't matter because it happens all the time", my only interest in this thread is to point out that this is property of Michelle Au and that should be respected. Bitch and moan all you want about copyright law; I could care less. I'm not on some copyright crusade. I am concerned about Michelle getting appropriate credit/payment for her work. END OF STORY.
Wow, you're a nutcase. As I have already stated, I don't really give a **** about copyright law. What I care about is that Michelle get the proper recognition for her work.Tallguy said:I could see stinkycheese yelling at physicians who are making copies of journal articles in the library rather than getting a subscription...
What ticks me off is that people were having fun with this forum and it was quite entertaining, and stinkycheese came in and messed it up... If I wanted to listen to copyright and patent infringements I would have gone to law school.
stinkycheese said:Wow, you're a nutcase. As I have already stated, I don't really give a **** about copyright law. What I care about is that Michelle get the proper recognition for her work.
Oh, go cry in a corner. All I said was that this was Michelle's work. You *****s turned it into a huge debate.
Get a life! It's a stupid internet forum. I'm sorry you're so pissed off at me, but... I really don't care.
Tallguy said:Go back to the pre-allo forum where you belong... You can post here when you have actually started medical school .
kinetic said:That's the sign of stupidity, when you have to say "I'm in medical school, so that makes me better than you." It's not like this is an allopathic issue.
kinetic said:3) Justifying OR negating an action based on an unrelated action is flawed logic. Meaning, to justify violating copyright laws for one thing by bringing up MP3s is weak logic -- that doesn't mean BOTH are OK, it means BOTH are wrong. Moreover, to say that since one person breaks one law, they must allow people to break all other laws is equally weak logic. It may remove their moral high ground, so to speak, but does not invalidate their point if their point is valid.
kinetic said:That's the sign of stupidity, when you have to say "I'm in medical school, so that makes me better than you." It's not like this is an allopathic issue.
kinetic said:Actually, total sign of stupidity is citing that you're in medical school for NO REASON WHATSOEVER. Then, running away from the issue and pretending that the comment meant nothing whatsoever. OMG! I just wanted to throw that out there!
kinetic said:Wow, keen sense of analysis: it's in the Allopathic forum, so even though it's not an allopathic issue, I think I'll mention the fact that I'm in medical school. That's about as relevant as going to the grocery store and saying, "I'd get those oranges because they're fresh ...I'm in medical school, so I'd know!" Which you probably do.
kinetic said:If this was an allopathic issue, then this would be a discussion about the validity of the portrayals. Since it's NOT and you participated in the copyright discussion, your point is without merit. It's a nice try.
kinetic said:2) I think a lot of people are hazy on copyright law. Like, you can't just SAY "copyright 2005" to make something copyrighted. People do that a lot on the Internet, but there's an actual process.
So true on both, especially number 2.wolferman said:...changing the subject back to what the OP might've had in mind when choosing to discuss this comic...
I think we should add "The Ever-present Ghost" medical student. This is the student that you see everyday in class; you might even know his/her name, but that's it. The person never comes to any social events, starts a conversation, or gives any hint to the fact that they have a life outside medical school. The only thing you know about them is that they are in your class.
The other student I'd add would be "The Chronically Bad Test Taker". This is the student who can answer just about any question you pose to them verbally, but somehow can't manage to score well on any exam (especially multiple choice). Most likely they are over thinking every question or they are too busy thinking up ingenious questions of their own during the exam and can't concentrate on the ones in front of them.
kerouac170 said:I have to side with Tall Guy on this one....kinetic just seems a little too eager to prove his/her intellectual worth (better not mess with kinetics intelligence, you might be beaten to chop suey and cry). Also, did any of you guys notice that Stinkycheese has to mention Michelles name in every single post? My current theory.... Stinkycheese= Kinetic = Michelles b*(ch
As much fun as this post was.....Im off to find a more entertaining one