should I retake it? by the time Im allowed to retake it (90 day rule) all the deadlines will pass.
I studied with destroyer and DAT Bootcamp and was doing really well on all the sections except QR
My avg DAT BC scores were the following:
ORG: around 23
Gen CHem: around 20-21
Reading : 21-23
PAT: 18-20
QR: 19-20
Bio: 20-22
I was hoping that since most people say BC underreport your score that I would get at least a 22 AA
Unfortunately, I did worse on every single section than I was used to. Plus the actual testing experience was terrible. my screen froze a few times and on the PAT the pens ran out of ink while I was doing hole punching so i had to wait at least 1 minute to get a replacement and that really stressed me out.
The science section was kinda weird as they were very little conceptual questions. I think the science section was on the "easy" end so missing 1 or 2 questions had a big impact on one's score.
In addition, the TFE and keyhole portion was impossible. BC PAT did not prepare me with that at all. I advise you to all get the other PAT study guide thats harder than BC and CD because all the hours i spend honing on improving my TFE and keyhole scores were useless. The angle ranking was a piece of cake though (much easier than BC). Unfortunately, i could not gage the difficulty of the hoel punching because i was under so much stressed since my pens ran out of ink at that moment and had to go forward and backwards to find the questions i skipped since i had to go all the way forward to the next set of questions where a pen was not needed.
The QR section was similar to BC. there were a few difficult questions that I skipped (about 3) that i completely guessed on. A lot of very basic. I think BC was a little bit harder. I think the test makers put a lot of calculation problems (like adding 5 different set of fractions together) to make students waste their time.
The reading was super easy which again confuses me because i got an 18 on that section but did very well on BC.
One thing to note is that i am a post bacc student who never took a science class while studying finance and econ made a lot of sacrifices just to be able to take the DAT and apply to dental school. My science GPA is around 3.6-3.7 and my undergrad gpa is 3.5 so i hope that admission people will like that im a post bacc whos more mature and dedicated.
Do you guys think I'll be able to get into a school? Im based in NY so ideally I'd like to stay in the Northeast.
Here are some tips for the test:
ask for new markers everytime cause they run out quickly
make sure to complain if something goes wrong. My testing center filed a report about the pen thing to the DAT folks.
I studied with destroyer and DAT Bootcamp and was doing really well on all the sections except QR
My avg DAT BC scores were the following:
ORG: around 23
Gen CHem: around 20-21
Reading : 21-23
PAT: 18-20
QR: 19-20
Bio: 20-22
I was hoping that since most people say BC underreport your score that I would get at least a 22 AA
Unfortunately, I did worse on every single section than I was used to. Plus the actual testing experience was terrible. my screen froze a few times and on the PAT the pens ran out of ink while I was doing hole punching so i had to wait at least 1 minute to get a replacement and that really stressed me out.
The science section was kinda weird as they were very little conceptual questions. I think the science section was on the "easy" end so missing 1 or 2 questions had a big impact on one's score.
In addition, the TFE and keyhole portion was impossible. BC PAT did not prepare me with that at all. I advise you to all get the other PAT study guide thats harder than BC and CD because all the hours i spend honing on improving my TFE and keyhole scores were useless. The angle ranking was a piece of cake though (much easier than BC). Unfortunately, i could not gage the difficulty of the hoel punching because i was under so much stressed since my pens ran out of ink at that moment and had to go forward and backwards to find the questions i skipped since i had to go all the way forward to the next set of questions where a pen was not needed.
The QR section was similar to BC. there were a few difficult questions that I skipped (about 3) that i completely guessed on. A lot of very basic. I think BC was a little bit harder. I think the test makers put a lot of calculation problems (like adding 5 different set of fractions together) to make students waste their time.
The reading was super easy which again confuses me because i got an 18 on that section but did very well on BC.
One thing to note is that i am a post bacc student who never took a science class while studying finance and econ made a lot of sacrifices just to be able to take the DAT and apply to dental school. My science GPA is around 3.6-3.7 and my undergrad gpa is 3.5 so i hope that admission people will like that im a post bacc whos more mature and dedicated.
Do you guys think I'll be able to get into a school? Im based in NY so ideally I'd like to stay in the Northeast.
Here are some tips for the test:
ask for new markers everytime cause they run out quickly
make sure to complain if something goes wrong. My testing center filed a report about the pen thing to the DAT folks.