You are really at no more likelhood of matching applying to 28 places as you are in applying to 15 or 16 places that are good fits for your experiences/goals. I have been told this by numerous faculty and APPIC themselves (they have a little statistical chart that they have posted too), so I assume thats accurate.
Actually, though that IS what they say, last year's stats actually show a peak at both 15 AND 20. The theory is that you are better off sending in 15 GOOD apps, then rushing and sending out a larger number of less-well-put-together apps. I started early, and having done this before was able to give equal and adequate time and energy to all. With over 2,000 internship sites nationwide it is not hard to find quite a few that are a great match if you don't limit yourself geographically
🙂 Not wanting to do this a 3rd time, and having submitted my 15 by the 3rd week of October, why NOT apply to more that I'm excited about? Sure, it costs more, but I'd rather spend more now and match, then do it all again next year!
Personally, I think there should be a cap at 15 sites for everyone. That would limit the number of apps sites get, guarantee that people applying to sites really are seriously interested in them, and reduce the competition (150 apps instead of 250 apps means more time to read yours; only competing with people who want said site rather then competitive applicants who would rank it as #20; etc). But, until that day comes...
🙂
If anyone wants the Stat of the percentage that did not match last year I'd be happy to pride it, but seems like posting said stat will just add to the anxiety. Seems like less sites are loosing funding this year, which ought to help.


