- Joined
- Jan 17, 2006
- Messages
- 8,514
- Reaction score
- 2,792
Our cousins to the north like to brag how applicants with gpa lower than a ~3.9 need not bother applying. The claim may be a bit of an exaggeration.
Attachments
Last edited:
Our cousins to the north like to brag how applicants with gpa lower than a ~3.9 need not bother applying. The claim may be a bit of an exaggeration.
Our cousins to the north like to brag how applicants with gpa lower than a ~3.9 need not bother applying. The claim may be a bit of an exaggeration.
It was referring to the low range of 3.3/3.5.how is that an exaggeration?
also, the majority of the Canadian schools calculate GPA on a 4.0 scale... so they don't get any benefit from having an A+
Also keep in mind that, for example, for Toronto and UWO, those GPAs are on an OMSAS scale, not an AADSAS scale. 4.33 doesn't exist. A 3.9 GPA is in the ballpark of a 90% average.
No need for a 4.33 when an 84 will get you a 3.9 and 75 or 80 will get you a 3.7.
http://www.ouac.on.ca/docs/omsas/c_omsas_b.pdf
It was referring to the low range of 3.3/3.5.
No need for a 4.33 when an 84 will get you a 3.9 and 75 or 80 will get you a 3.7.
http://www.ouac.on.ca/docs/omsas/c_omsas_b.pdf
This is true. But... I'd like to point out that the majority of these schools ONLY look at GPA, DAT and interview score (and put it into the 50/25/25 weighting scheme..or something along those lines depending on the school) for you to gain admission. No reference, no personal statement...no CV of any kind. So, if you're like me and on the lower end of the GPA scale and don't kick @$$ in the interview and your DAT, you're SOL. So, having that 3.9 GPA just makes it a bit easier on yourself to gain admission.
this is just a blatant lie
you do need to write a PS, your EC experiences, awards, and reference letters...
this is just a blatant lie
you do need to write a PS, your EC experiences, awards, and reference letters...
It was referring to the low range of 3.3/3.5.
No need for a 4.33 when an 84 will get you a 3.9 and 75 or 80 will get you a 3.7.
http://www.ouac.on.ca/docs/omsas/c_omsas_b.pdf
U of A doesn't need any of those things either, along with UWO and U of T. I'm a resident of both Alberta and Ontario, and having just interviewed at those three schools I think I know what I've submitted for my application, and what my admission is based on.
UWO is being really quiet. I'm dying to find out how I did on my interview. Do they release the scores?
Nope. They don't even tell you if you were above, at, or below the average. They also neglect to tell you where you rank on the waitlist should you be placed on it. There's little to no transparency.
You seem to have read the chart completely wrong. You took Scale 4 as the example of getting a 3.9 with an 84%. Look at the legend underneath. Only applicants from the Royal Military College of Canada have their grades converted under Scale 4.
the only school under column 4 is the military school
they get a break for obvious reasons
Yeah, you definitely misunderstood...
Now at my institution the grade scale goes like this:
A+ = 98-100%;A = 94-97%,A- = 90-93%;B+ = 86-89%;B. = 82-85%;B- = 78-81%
The only school where you can get a 3.7 from a 75 is at RMC (royal military college of Canada)
Mount Royal is the only school in Canada whose range is the one you described. The only other Canadian institution with a high requirement for an A+ is St. Thomas More College at 96-100.
Mount Royal is the only school in Canada whose range is the one you described. The only other Canadian institution with a high requirement for an A+ is St. Thomas More College at 96-100.
From this we can conclude that you have been misinformed...here is a picture of the evaluations portion straight from my Organic Chemistry course outline enjoy ....
heres a the typical grading scale for the University of Calgary, straight out of a Geophysics Course outline...
now take a look at the OMSAS chart and you will see that it is under column 7 as well, indicating that you need to get 95+ at the U of C just for a 4.0 on the scale
You seem to be confusing an individual course grade scale with the college policy. Apparently OMSAS, OLSAS and McMaster University are equally misinformed.
http://www.ouac.on.ca/docs/omsas/c_omsas_b.pdf
http://www.ouac.on.ca/docs/olsas/c_olsas_b.pdf
http://studentsuccess.mcmaster.ca/resources/gpa-conversion-chart.html
Having trouble following your own directions?instructions
1. find your school in the table at the bottom
2. Identify the number associated with your school
3. near the top there will be a row of numbers 1 to 9
4. now, the only columns of any relevance to you is the column associated with your school (in the case of UofC it's number 7 and and OMSAS value column to the left
5. say for instance you took one class at the UofC and recieved a 94% which will grant you an A
6. to find the OMSAS GPA value, find A under column 7, then go straight left until you find the associated GPA, in this case it will be 3.9
7. by this you can conclude that your UofC 94% is equivelent to a 3.9 on the OMSAS conversion chart
here is another example from the second best university in Canada:
its an OMSAS column 7 school so an A+ is equired for a 4.0
according to their grade scale that means you need a 90+
http://webapps.utsc.utoronto.ca/aac...ning/academic-standing/164-calculate-your-gpa
Again, I will enlighten you on the fact that most schools in Canada don't grant a 4.3 for A+ like the AADSAS does
Having trouble following your own directions?
The OP points out that, unlike Canadian, US universities do not award an A (A-) with an 80. ADEA/AADSAS is not a point granting institution. It converts the various grading system to a standardized grade, not unlike that used by OMSAS. OLSAS, McMaster. In spite of your assertion, you might find it harder to find US institutions with A+ as part of their grading system. A preliminary review of the first 34 Canadian institutions listed in the document shows 18 schools that do indeed have the A+. In any case, this is pretty much irrelevant, since in the US, ADEA standardizes the gpa to a 4.0 system. Without a centralized application process, Canadian ds can and do use whatever system they wish. Manitoba converts an A+ to 4.5; Dalhousie converts an A+ to 4.3 and Saskatchewan converts an A+ to 93; A to 88 and A- to 83.
Also those 3 schools may be an exception, it's also valuable to understand that Manitoba and Saskatchewan are the two smallest dental schools in all of Canada having 29 and 28 seats each.
What a tiny representation
The 3 schools actually represent ~20% (tiny) of the Can ds enrollees. Not that the multiplying facor is particularly important, but you can add Laval at 4.33 and Montreal at 4.3(?). Can you find a handful of, preferably bonafide, US universities where an 80 is an A-?
this argument has already ended, good try Also, I'd like to see what happens if you would post something like this on premed101 here's the link: http://www.premed101.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7
The 3 schools actually represent ~20% (tiny) of the Can ds enrollees. Not that the multiplying facor is particularly important, but you can add Laval at 4.33 and Montreal at 4.3(?). Can you find a handful of, preferably bonafide, US universities where an 80 is an A-?
Can you find me a Canadian School that on average accepts a cGPA of 2.94 (Howard)
this argument has already ended, good try Also, I'd like to see what happens if you would post something like this on premed101 here's the link: http://www.premed101.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7