That makes sense. Where's the cutoff though? I've only been out of my old job for a year now and have done ~100 hrs of volunteering in that time. No shadowing yet, but I plan to try and get that lined up after the mcat in a couple of weeks. I'm also an advisor right now for an on-campus organization, and I was pretty involved in undergrad. I also did a fair amount of volunteer work (not in the medical field) in the 4 years after graduation and before I came back to school. Like the poster above said, it's all so subjective. I just want to crawl into a hole until this is all over, haha.
I can't tell you how they do things at other schools, but at my school, we don't have a "cutoff" in terms of a specific number of hours that the adcom is looking for. Again, as you said, it's very subjective, and maybe the best way to think about it is that it follows the
Potter Stewart standard. In your case, getting the shadowing is definitely a good idea since it doesn't sound like you have much clinical experience yet.
I guess I am just frustrated that as a nontrad the fact that I left another career field to do this doesn't seem to show "commitment". And frankly, the wording of the statement bothers me. I would've been fine with, "we aren't comfortable with the fact that you don't have a lot of clinical experience" or even, "we prefer that our applicants have more hands-on clinical time than you have." I took issue with the fact that I "wasn't committed enough." That is calling into question things that no individual other than the applicant him/herself can truly understand. Commitment to something is largely mental and while racking up hours in the clinic could indicate commitment, in my opinion, it mostly shows that the person knows how to work the system and check off the right boxes. Granted, perhaps that is a useful and desirable skill in a physician as well?
My point is that clinic hours don't necessarily correlate to "commitment," but leaving success behind you to be broke and never see your family DOES show a commitment, albeit an intangible one. That's all.
Your frustration is completely understandable, and you won't get any argument from me concerning the wording of telling an applicant like you that you aren't "committed" enough. As you suggest, I'd rather someone just tell it to me like it is.
And yes, I took their suggestion and sought out more clinical experience. I improved my app tremendously, actually, and I feel a lot better going into it this year.
You're doing all the right things then, and best of luck to you.
🙂
One more thing, Q, and this is a genuine, heartfelt question from someone who doesn't really know what they're doing to someone who obviously does know what they are doing (you got in, after all, and that is what I am trying to do!). I'm not trying to be inflammatory or anything like that.
My question is this: why does it seem like nontrads have to work 3000 times harder than a trad to prove this (the bolded portion)? Truthfully, I don't have much experience with other premeds -- I try to avoid them, generally -- but it seems like a nontrad has to do so much more to prove this, while some 20 yo kid can just get mommy and daddy to pay for a weeklong mission trip to guatemala or something.... And I'm not knocking missions or anything. I think they're great, just not practical for everyone (including me!).
You seem to know how the admissions process works, so I would be happy to know if there is something in particular adcoms like to see specifically from nontrads to go that extra mile, so to speak.
Your question is more than fair. Again, I can only speak for my own school. (I've been a student adcom for the past three years.) The adcom does not have special standards or expect anything else from nontrads that we don't expect from trads. But, and this is a big but, we also expect nontrads to cut the same muster that the trads do. In other words, being a nontrad is not a disadvantage to you, and may be a significant advantage in terms of your ECs and interviewing ability. But it's not a get into med school free card. We expect that *all* of the applicants will have some kind of clinical experience, regardless of their age.
As for why you perceive the app process to be harder for nontrads, my guess would be that it's in large part because nontrads tend to have more competing responsibilities than trads do. Trads are usually not worried about families and mortgages and the like. So in that sense, I agree with you that nontrads do have a harder time in terms of balancing all of the same expectations compared to younger applicants who are less encumbered. On the other hand, adcoms are aware that nontrads tend to have more responsibilities competing for their time and attention, and at least at my school, we do sometimes make exceptions for various requirements on a case by case basis.
I also think that the relative isolation of nontrads plays into this. When you are a nontrad, you often do not have a premed advisor, or a premed committee, or a premed club. You mentioned before about med school selecting for people who can play the game, so to speak, and there is definitely something to that. In other words, it's sometimes hard to know how to jump through the hoops when you don't have the same guidance that most of your trad peers have. (Not that I have much general respect for premed advisors, mind you.

)
P.S. I think of medical missions as "medical vacations." If a week-long vacation in a third world country is an applicant's only clinical experience, then I'd say they need to show more commitment to medicine.
😉
Because that 20 yo kid has a significantly higher GPA than we do?
Well, yeah, and there's that too. On average, nontrads have significantly lower stats (both GPA and MCAT) than trads do.