Ho-lee, I actually have an interview! I applied to 7 schools, this is the first one I have heard back from. Hoping that is a good sign and I applied to enough!
Congratulations! I remember my first II. I was on cloud 9!
Ho-lee, I actually have an interview! I applied to 7 schools, this is the first one I have heard back from. Hoping that is a good sign and I applied to enough!
Ho-lee, I actually have an interview! I applied to 7 schools, this is the first one I have heard back from. Hoping that is a good sign and I applied to enough!
Where is it at? What are your stats? Where else did you apply?
I applied to 8 MD schools and 12 DO schools. I have one II, and waiting to hear back from a lot of other places. No rejections (yet).
dsoz
I picked schools based on states I thought I could talk my husband into moving if I don't get into an Oregon school. That way he knows he isn't forgotten in my drive for med school...
My Oregonian friend! I have seen you posting on COMP-NW (my top choice). I have applied to COMP-NW, AZCOM (interview), PCOM-GA (almost done with secondary), DMU, PNWU (not done with the long essay), LECOM, ATSU, and the only MD: OHSU.
This is what we did! Bought a big US map, and started putting stickies all over the place. Started picking off post-its city by city based on our likes/dislikes in environment and what we want our kids to have access to. Eventually we got down to a reasonable number.
I did a similar process with my wife, but no big map. Mostly it was using the MSAR and a handy spreadsheet that I got from SDN that had every school listed with average GPA, MCAT and LizzyM score. I chose schools that I was +/- 2 LizzyM points that was in an area of the country that my wife was willing to move.
I had to cut a few schools that I was excited about from my list, but hey! My wife's happiness is definitely more important. I really, really want to avoid ending up in a city that she doesn't like.
I still couldn't resist applying to the Mayo Clinic, though.
For nontrads, they're worth applying to. I got a LOR request from them despite my 3.1 GPA/32 MCAT, and only about a fifth of their applicants get that far. They rejected me after that, but they're still a school that takes much more than your LizzyM score into consideration. Now I have interviews at Nova and Western Lebanon. Should I go to the school named after an old Chevy, or the school that sounds like a Middle Eastern war zone?
The way I look at it is by the weather. At NOVA the weather is hot and muggy for about 4 months a year. Most people stay indoors and out of the heat. The rest of the year it is nice and people can enjoy the sunshine.
At COMP-NW, there is only three months where the sun shines and you can be outside enjoying it. The rest of the year it is cloudy and rainy. Not even rain like for an hour or so, but drizzle all day long and only get 1/4 to 1/2 inch. Nobody goes outside, and everyone is low on Vitamin D (or supplementing with 2000 IU a day).
I like the way you think!
I'm glad I'm not the only one who takes weather into account when making these kinds of decisions. I'm not saying it's the deciding factor, but it's definitely an issue.
do you guys think that very non traditional age has anything to do with not getting an early ii even when everything else is solid?
do you guys think that very non traditional age has anything to do with not getting an early ii even when everything else is solid?
I'm still just an applicant but my guess is if you do a great job answering the why medicine/why now elephant in the room question throughout your app (and your reasoning makes great sense), I don't see why you should not get an acceptance before this is all over if the rest of your app is solid. Remember, we are only about a month or so into a year long process.
above average in all front
i understand that we are still very early, but i was just comparing my timeline with others. there is an applicant who has already gotten ii even when he applied to this specific school very late. how can that be unless there are so biased involved. granted, i don't know that person's exact stats, but still..
maybe i am getting too paranoid reading SDN. i should take a vacation from here 😀
Are you talking about DO, MD, or both? It would be more helpful if you listed your stats and ECs rather than just saying above average, but I understand if you'd like to keep things private.
trying to keep pvt
mostly DO here
got three ii, just don't understand why not more when i've clearly applied very early
i understand that we are still very early, but i was just comparing my timeline with others. there is an applicant who has already gotten ii even when he applied to this specific school very late. how can that be unless there are so biased involved. granted, i don't know that person's exact stats, but still..
maybe i am getting too paranoid reading SDN. i should take a vacation from here 😀
Take heart in that not only do you not know someone's stats but we just don't know and can only speculate on how decisions to bring someone in for an interview are made. I guess that is why they say this process is a crapshoot. You play and hope to win.
i heard somewhere that DMU and ccom are two of the best, then how is it that i got a fast track ii there long time ago, but still no word from nsu or lecom b? it sure is crapshoot
22 MD apps submitted, all but one secondary in, 3 iis so far (including Michigan! totally unexpected and still bouncing off the walls!)
What reasons does a school have to flat out deny an applicant? So long as he or she has good grades and good test scores, how do they make their decision on who to interview, who to accept, and who to deny? Or is it all just a random "luck of the draw" sort of thing?
I assume each school receives several thousand applications starting in May or June. Do they review them first-come-first-serve? Do they sort them alphabetically? Do they sort them by MCAT score? Who do they review first? Who do they invite to an interview first? Or do they review everybody's application, and only then start offering invites?
If I were an AdCom, I would first find all of the really good candidates and try to "lock them in" to my school before someone else gives them a better offer. Next I would bring in all of the questionable candidates for an interview, weed out the losers, and put several hundred not-so-good candidates on a waitlist to make them think they had a shot (and to give me a sizable pool to pick from last-minute if need be). Finally, I would interview all of the moderately good candidates and fill my class roster as much as possible from that group.
How do you think the real AdComs do it?
Congrats on the interviews everyone!
Hi guys, could use some input-
I'm pretty ashamed to be writing this. In completing my first ii, I realized that I left my first FT job (as a research economist) off my work/extracurriculars AAMC app. I refer to my experience at that job in my PS, and it is also significant in that I started there working 40-50 hours a week while still an undergrad (yes, it affected my grades).
I know I can't change it. I still can't believe it. I haven't slept in 3 days since I realized my error. How do I move forward? Is it a big enough error that I should consider just not applying this cycle? Am I saved by the fact that many secondaries ask about these experiences, or doomed since it will not be verified by the AAMC app?
Glad everyone seems to be doing well and keeping up on their ii's though! 🙂
Well, I don't think secondary fees are as "nefarious" as some people assume - Yes, most medical schools do not have huge recruiting/admission budgets, and many use volunteer time (including my school). Indeed, there are significant opportunity costs involved in admissions. But I think there is no way collecting these fees would even put a dent into those costs.
If I was designing an admission strategy, I would be loath to have two screening passes. I know for a fact that great candidates sometimes don't have great numbers. And Vice-versa. If I was really acting in the interest of the school, I wouldn't use a numbers-based pre-screen.
No, unless you are doing a straight numbers-based "pre-screen" you are going to have to a human being crack open the application and read it. Sounds like a logistics nightmare to me at that stage: Why? Because if you are going to assign a busy physician or scientist an application, physically or electronically send it to them, and have them open up and write up a formal report or something else- you might as well have them read it in its entirety and make an interview invitation recommendation.
So - if you are like me and loath to use straight numbers to screen, and you recognize that there is little time/money "saved" by pre-screening - what can you do? Why, a fee, of course. Think how many people would apply to every school if there was no additional cost. With no "down-side" people would apply to EVERY school. That's no good.
Having a nominal fee prevents the adcom from being inundated with applications. It is ideal? Nope. Sure there are waivers for people who qualify. But waivers require additional effort, and that's probably not fair. But the fees are a proxy for pre-screening. Think of it as the alternative to a pure numbers-based screening tool. It is sort of the lesser of two evils.![]()
Now that's my two cents. I might be off base. Would I pay the fees again even knowing I was rejected a bunch of places? Absolutely. At least I was given a shot - however slim. Better than auto-rejects.
No clue. Schools have no reason to tell anybody either or even IF they have a screen. You will not find it on-line from a reliable source. And it is subject to change without notice.What numbers does a typical adcom use for the pre-screen?
Best of luck to all the pre-meds for this cycle. Seems like yesterday I was doing the same thing. I'll be joining you on pins & needles this year as I'll be doing my residency applications as well.
GO NON-TRADS!