Says the person who have nothing to back up his own statement. You're asking others to assume that YOU know what you're talking about and that they should believe you, even though you never elaborated your expertise. repititionition at least made some thoughtful comments that are true after some research on the internet of my own, so I tend to want to believe what he said over you, who managed nothing but posting personal attack on this forum.
No one is asking you to trust him. Most people hopefully would do some research before investing with their money, and he's merely making few suggestions (good ones that I didn't even know about before reading this thread).
He never said you can access that money after you graduate. He was saying that you can use the IRA to pay for your medical school tuition. If you think it's too much hassle to file the paperwork so that you can invest tax free, well that's your own personal problem. Plus with tuition around 50k and IRA/401k that will most likely below that, it will be in 1 transaction. I don't see the hassle that you're describing.
What "wink" tactic/committing fraud? The money in IRA is shielded from FAFSA part? Find me the SEC/IRS regulation or USC section saying that it is illegal and I will believe you, but before then, I'll just assume you're talking out of your behind.
If you had done some proper research then you would realize what he is saying is either false, or not your best option depending on which part you are talking about. I will happily address each of your concerns one by one.
First, I don't claim to have any true expertise in the field other then turning down a FT job at Morgan Stanley as a Financial Advisor last June because I decided I did in fact want to go to medical school. Regardless I was merely pointing out that he used the fact that supposedly no one else has expertise, and left you to assume that he did have expertise so you should go with what he says. Second
Next, putting money in a 401k or even a Roth IRA is barely scratching the surface of investing.
If you use that money to pay for tuition then you are going to have less "life" money during medical school because your loans will be for that much less. And that wink I was referring to had nothing to do with FAFSA shielding. It had to do with "Once enrolled in school, you can withdraw nearly ANY AMOUNT of this money from the 401k without early withdrawal penalty as long as you can tie the amount withdrawn to a qualified educational expense (and since tuition, room and board (food) are all qualified expenses, you're pretty much good to go on any reasonable annual withdrawal,
even if it doesn't -wink- pay for rent or groceries)"
It's important to note that you wont be able to touch the money after you graduate medical school for the same reasoning I gave in my very first post. When you retire the amount you can put in there right now will make no difference in your retirement quality of life due to your expected income over your lifetime as a physician. However, during medical school, residency, and early years of being a doctor overall that money can make a big difference in quality of life. You still are poor during Residency, so wouldn't you prefer to use that money when it will actually make a difference in your life? You can use that money to put a down payment on a house, going out for dinner or drinks to stay sane, or any possible expense you can think of that you may have during residency etc. And if you read a little bit you can even put that money to work in the stock market and make some pretty decent income with out decreasing you base. There are much better ways over substantially growing your base right now which will then have a ripple effect on your retirement later on if thats such a big deal to you. The two big ones are, buying a house (obviously after you graduate medical school), or stock market.
The notion that right now is not the time to be risking any capital is so wrong that it's baffling. Ask any financial planner and they will tell you basic strategy is to be most aggressive when you are young and tone it down as your get older and increase your financial responsibilities and need less beta (volatility) in your income.
Lastly, his whole rant on investing in Amazon, and the whole tech market giving him that" old-fashioned feeling of "bubble" is the part that is most laughable and absurd. I'll pick that one apart for you piece by piece as well. Here is his post for your reference
"As for asset allocation, with this time horizon (6 months to 4 years), I'd be parking all or nearly all of it in a money-market fund within a Roth IRA. There is no point in putting capital at risk in this situation. Nobody can call a market top, but tech valuations right now are giving me that old-fashioned "bubble" feeling. Related: I just got an email inviting me to sign up for grocery delivery from Amazon (think kozmo.com). That was my sign to start selling."
For the part about time horizon - 4 years is a long time horizon for investing, and it has nothing to do with whether or not you should be in the stock market or not. If you want to be more aggressive (as you should be) you play the short term investment game which can range anywhere from a day, to several months of holding onto a specific stock. If you prefer to be a little more conservative then you buy stocks with the outlook of holding 6months+ and do not pay much attention to any single days peaks and valley's as that's not part of your strategy.
No point in risking capital right now - again I addressed that earlier, right now is THE time to be risking capital. Again because you are young enough to be able to recover from any potential losses with relative ease, and the losses will not be that great relatively. Where as any gains would significantly benefit you. Financial planning 101
Nobody can call a market top huh? Yet what does he do immediately after, he starts calling one. Not only that, he calls it arbitrarily. Don't believe me? Well let me ask you this, what exactly is that " old-fashioned "bubble" feeling" anyways? Sounds like a smooth line supported in non-sense. What does a bubble feel like? How long have you been investing to really be attune to this "feeling" if it in fact exists (which of course it doesn't). While we are on that topic what do you know about tech valuations, or valuations period? Because from what it sounds like, it seems like you value a company based on it's stock price which by itself is ridiculous. First you look at whether or not that sector is cyclical or secular, and which you want to be depending on where the economy is (cyclical when you are in a bull market, and secular when a bear. We are in a bull market right now, so cyclical is where the big gains are, and tech is overall cyclical. The most simple and basic ways to value a single company are by it's Earnings per Share (EPS) multiple, and looking at their Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) as a way to look at the companies cash flow. Looking at company earnings report to see where they are growing and lagging, and what their guidance for future quarters is. Looking at what specific sectors that company is involved in (if there are more then one) and what multiples it's peers are currently valued at and if there is a discrepancy -- figuring out why and coming to a conclusion if its justified or not. And it only gets more complicated from there when you start looking at Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models in which there are several methods to come up with different forecasting models of the same thing and you need to understand Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to create. But of course, because the wind hit him on his backside at a 15 degree angle he has that old fashioned bubble feeling. I'll have you know that if you look at just the very first and most basic data point of valuing a company which again is it's EPS, you would see that currently the tech sector along with all of the other sectors overall are at historical norms, which indicates you are not at bubble levels. Which means the stock prices in that sector are going up because they are showing strong earnings, and have strong guidance overall for the future. This raises the stock price but keeps the multiple unchanged. This is not me saying I am an expert and have the expertise to call a bubble or create a DCF, but I do have the expertise to look at EPS, EBITDA, and Earnings reports, and most importantly the ability to recognize when someone doesn't know the basic principles of investing and is making stuff up.
Lastly, and this is the point that really made me want to make sure everyone was clear that this guy had no idea what he was talking about was that he just got an email from amazon about a new product launch, and that was his impetus to sell. This is so ridiculous I barely know where to start to take it a part. First off you should never buy or sell a company based on a single advertising e-mail you got. Secondly, if there is anything that could possibly be taken away from that type of email it's that Amazon is continuing to grow it's distribution and logistics network while already being the largest of its kind in the world, and is trying to take it to the next step with same day delivery. This is a positive thing, because it allows Amazon to have the flexibility to pivot and adapt to new trends and dominate the market a lot faster then a brick and mortar store can which is why so many brick and mortar stores are now trying to play catch up with Amazon because they realize they are losing market share every quarter. Third, all of these things are priced into the stock way before you got that email. Amazon has been talking about this for a while, and by the time they finally launched it, this news was super old and was already taken into account by much more complicated models like DCF valuations etc which is what Bulge Bracket (BB) banks, Middle Market (MM) banks, and Boutique banks all use when investing, and it's immediate release has no bearing on where the stock is heading in the near future.
So yeah, I think with all the above, I will reaffirm my position that he has no clue what he is talking about, and falls into the same category he was trying to put others into.