- Joined
- Jun 29, 2008
- Messages
- 367
- Reaction score
- 3
Ok, I'm sure I'm going to get a lot of mixed response here so please keep an open mind when reading what follows. A major part of both my freshman and sophomore years in college was professional internet poker playing. I didn't win any huge tournaments, nor did I really play many tournaments (however in the less than 50 I've played I've had several mid-4-figure cashes). I considered myself a cash game player, playing as high as $5/$10 no limit ($1000 buy-in). The game afforded me ample intellectual stimulation and enough money to pay all of my own living expenses along with a portion of my tuition (took a lot of stress off my parents). I approach the game very analytically, but the problem is the title "professional poker player" carries a bit of a stigma (read: "degenerate") in conservative communities (read: medicine). However, most people I've talked to tend to think it's the coolest thing and must be super exciting... until I start rattling off about hand ranges, percentages, odds, estimated value calculations, and generally start sounding like I belong at Goldman Sachs instead of at a card table (unfortunately the "boring" stuff is what it takes to win, kids).
I really want to put this on my AMCAS, but I'm concerned with how it will be percieved. I know for a fact that I can defend it well in an interview, but it's getting to the interview that matters at this point. Anyone have an opinion?
Also, a lighter question: I spent the majority of my life alpine ski racing, and competed in several races freshman year but decided to opt out for most of the season and the entire season for my sophomore and junior years due to the fact that it's incredibly travel intensive and would interfere with my studies. Should I include this even if my participation was limited in college (although still present)?
I really want to put this on my AMCAS, but I'm concerned with how it will be percieved. I know for a fact that I can defend it well in an interview, but it's getting to the interview that matters at this point. Anyone have an opinion?
Also, a lighter question: I spent the majority of my life alpine ski racing, and competed in several races freshman year but decided to opt out for most of the season and the entire season for my sophomore and junior years due to the fact that it's incredibly travel intensive and would interfere with my studies. Should I include this even if my participation was limited in college (although still present)?