A few questions

[rooster]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

1. how do define 'normal variant'?
2. how do you define 'anomaly'?
3. do you think the two are interchangable terms? why?
4. what term would you apply to a fabella? why?

All replies welcomed to help settle a difference of opinion on this. Thanks

 

[doepug]

1. Normal variant = atypical finding that is normally seen in some percentage of the population. Generally has no clinical significance, and is considered within the spectrum of normal findings.

2. Anomaly = abnormality, without reference to whether a finding has clinical relevance.

3. I don't use anomaly in my reports -- feel it is too vague.

4. Fabella = normal variant. Lots of people have one, and it has little to no clinical bearing. These are not routinely reported at my institution, given how normal they are.

 

[f_w]

> 1. how do define 'normal variant'?

Anything I can find in Keats.

(something worth reporting so some surgeon looking at the images won't operate on it)

> 2. how do you define 'anomaly'?

Why would I use that word in a report. There are findings and then there are normal variants, I don't think there is anything in between.

> 3. do you think the two are interchangable terms? why?

No.

> 4. what term would you apply to a fabella? why?

Normal variant. I might be wrong, but I don't think they have any clinical significance.