- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Messages
- 217
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 4,646
- Age
- 45
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Here's the question
If a > b > c > d > 0, then
(a) ad > bc
(b) ac > b*b
(c) abd > abc
(d) a - c > b - d
(e) none of these
If I use one set of numbers (say a = 4, b = 3, c = 2, and d =1) and I find the correct answer, can I assume that that answer will be correct for all sets of numbers that satisfy the if criteria?
Does that make sense? After I have an answer should I try and find a set of numbers that does not satisfy the correct answer...that could be time consuming depending on how many sets I try.
Mark
If a > b > c > d > 0, then
(a) ad > bc
(b) ac > b*b
(c) abd > abc
(d) a - c > b - d
(e) none of these
If I use one set of numbers (say a = 4, b = 3, c = 2, and d =1) and I find the correct answer, can I assume that that answer will be correct for all sets of numbers that satisfy the if criteria?
Does that make sense? After I have an answer should I try and find a set of numbers that does not satisfy the correct answer...that could be time consuming depending on how many sets I try.
Mark