Once a year, we all jam a ridiculous amount of worthless facts into our head in the hopes that we'll score well on this stupid test. It's not like we're spending hours going over the intricacies of surgical decision-making, or stressing over how to manage common surgical disease. We know that already.
Instead, we memorize gut hormones, abx mech of action, RQs, most common this, least common that, etc. My head is currently full of hundreds of one-liners. I can only hope that the ABSITE doesn't ask me to actually elaborate on why the MIBG scan localizes Pheos, or how a Sulfur Colloid scan or Somatostatin Receptor Scintography works.....
In a lot of cases, I have to unlearn things so I won't overthink the questions, especially since the test seems to lag several years behind the literature. It also seems to purposefully ask questions where the correct answer is not listed, or maybe there's 2 correct answers.....
It would be different if I thought the test would avoid controversial subjects, but I know that they are definitely going to ask questions on subjects where you can make an equal argument for several answers. And, they're going to give you numbers in the grey zone, e.g. a 4 or 5 cm adrenal incidentaloma, and then ask you what to do. And, of course, there's no good solid reference. Each study guide has conflicting and outdated information.
To me, it feels like a yearly miniature Step 1 exam. Not as extensive or stressful, but to me, it's equally frustrating, and similar in worth. And still, here I am, begrudgingly jumping through the hoop again....😳
Instead, we memorize gut hormones, abx mech of action, RQs, most common this, least common that, etc. My head is currently full of hundreds of one-liners. I can only hope that the ABSITE doesn't ask me to actually elaborate on why the MIBG scan localizes Pheos, or how a Sulfur Colloid scan or Somatostatin Receptor Scintography works.....
In a lot of cases, I have to unlearn things so I won't overthink the questions, especially since the test seems to lag several years behind the literature. It also seems to purposefully ask questions where the correct answer is not listed, or maybe there's 2 correct answers.....
It would be different if I thought the test would avoid controversial subjects, but I know that they are definitely going to ask questions on subjects where you can make an equal argument for several answers. And, they're going to give you numbers in the grey zone, e.g. a 4 or 5 cm adrenal incidentaloma, and then ask you what to do. And, of course, there's no good solid reference. Each study guide has conflicting and outdated information.
To me, it feels like a yearly miniature Step 1 exam. Not as extensive or stressful, but to me, it's equally frustrating, and similar in worth. And still, here I am, begrudgingly jumping through the hoop again....😳