Imo this is an example of an egregious case of a chairman at a residency program running amok:
The Case Report conclusively found:
Witnesses' testimony substantiated the allegations that Bahnson has made direct
or implied threats to members of the Department of Urology;
By making threats about future employment, recommendation letters, and taking
paternity leave, Bahnson has behaved in a way that is in conflict with Ohio States’
values of Integrity, Openness and Trust, and Empathy and Compassion;
Investigators found that there is a pervasive fear in the Department of Urology
that Bahnson will follow through on his threats. There is a culture of fear and
intimidation in the Department of Urology;
There is sufficient evidence that Bahnson's behavior is consistent with a hostile
work environment, which exists when an employee experiences workplace
harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating. or
oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser;
The mechanisms in place through the Residency Program to protect residents did
not function as intended;
The impact of Box's lack of authority as Residency Program Director is that there
has been no buffer between residents and Bahnson's intimidating behavior;
Witness testimonies substantiate the allegation that Bahnson made physical
contact in a threatening manner with a former resident. This type of behavior is a
direct violation of university policy and is unacceptable. Based on the witnesses'
testimony of direct and implied threats, physical contact of an aggressive nature
and intimidation that has disrupted the work environment in the Department of
Urology, the conclusion of the investigation is there is a finding of sufficient
evidence of a policy violation as it relates to the university's Workplace and
Family and Relationship Violence Policy 7.05;
The witness testimonies substantiated the allegations that Bahnson engaged in
harassment by making multiple comments relating to national origin;
The conclusion of the investigation is there is a finding of sufficient evidence of a
policy violation as it relates the university's Affirmative Action, Equal
Employment Opportunity and Non-discrimination/Harassment policy