Achiever questions...

[jirotrom]

---

Members don't see this ad.

So when reviewing the answers from your Achiever test take, is it important to review all the sections extensively. For example, is bio over detailed, or any of the subjects? Or is it very helpful for the real DAT to review all the subjects... because I thought I heard that Chemistry was a crapshoot.
Thanks for any help

 

[solstice]

So when reviewing the answers from your Achiever test take, is it important to review all the sections extensively. For example, is bio over detailed, or any of the subjects? Or is it very helpful for the real DAT to review all the subjects... because I thought I heard that Chemistry was a crapshoot.
Thanks for any help

What's a point of buying and taking the test if you won't review it?

 

[FreeFallin]

What's a point of buying and taking the test if you won't review it?

I agree. Review is HUGE. I'm reviewing every single problem and relearning things I hadn't seen in years.

 

[jirotrom]

What's a point of buying and taking the test if you won't review it?

let me rephrase what I mean... Is any of it out of the scope of the real DAT? meaning would i be better off reviewing questions elsewhere... or are there questions that are asked that really would never be asked on the DAT.

 

[sfoksn]

let me rephrase what I mean... Is any of it out of the scope of the real DAT? meaning would i be better off reviewing questions elsewhere... or are there questions that are asked that really would never be asked on the DAT.

I think anything can be asked on the real DAT. To be honest, I thought the real DAT's "scope" was deeper, but Achiever's scope was just... random.

Real DAT required me know the common concepts that people would just pass by like "Oh, I know what that does" with much deeper understanding in order to answer the question. Achiever was like "Choose the organism that reproduce by both fragmentation and conjugation," just super random question, not hard questions.

 

[UndergradGuy7]

I think anything can be asked on the real DAT. To be honest, I thought the real DAT's "scope" was deeper, but Achiever's scope was just... random.

Real DAT required me know the common concepts that people would just pass by like "Oh, I know what that does" with much deeper understanding in order to answer the question. Achiever was like "Choose the organism that reproduce by both fragmentation and conjugation," just super random question, not hard questions.

How about an example of a "deeper scope" question?