- Joined
- Oct 16, 2016
- Messages
- 236
- Reaction score
- 607
I've never once heard this before, but I guess that might just be meWhen someone means to ask "what's your ethnicity", they often phrase it as "where are you from"
I've never once heard this before, but I guess that might just be meWhen someone means to ask "what's your ethnicity", they often phrase it as "where are you from"
I'm not even sure how you would do it. You'd have to send a survey and require a picture back or maybe have an application have two designations next to each other.I'd be interested to see what works better, for sure. Let some grad student do that study, though. That'd be a lot of data to sift through.
I've never once heard this before, but I guess that might just be me
I'm not even sure how you would do it. You'd have to send a survey and require a picture back or maybe have an application have two designations next to each other.
That one might solve it, but then you may be opening up a political can of worms. I'm pretty sure black people like the term "black" better (though that just may be my experience), but even if that's the case, a whole bunch of angry people could come out of the woodwork like they always seem to when anything changes.I understand the convention argument, it can often be confusing to switch conventions in many cases, but I don't see how switching from "African-American" to "Black" can do anything but make things clearer. I can't see any room for confusion there.
That would definitely work, but it would also inflate the cost and decrease the sample size.You could just do an in-person masked sort of experiment. Tell subjects they're coming in for a math test or something and include questions about demographics in the end with different phrasing.
That one might solve it, but then you may be opening up a political can of worms. I'm pretty sure black people like the term "black" better (though that just may be my experience), but even if that's the case, a whole bunch of angry people could come out of the woodwork like they always seem to when anything changes.
That's exactly what I was thinking.Lots of trust funded white people without a cause will show up to protest at your door.
The applicant can check any box they want. We can decide for ourselves.
I did... and look, I know what you said. I was just saying that I think he should still be held to the same standard as others, regardless of how good a guy he is elsewhere in his life. That's how I see it, maybe you view it differently.Have you taken the MCAT yet?
I said he’s a good guy who is a hero, ie, puts others before himself all the time. This instance of poor judgment (which he hasn’t actually done yet) is not typical of him, so I am hoping be changes his mind.
I did... and look, I know what you said. I was just pointing out that I think he should still be held to the same standard as others, regardless of how good a guy he is elsewhere in his life. That's how I see it, maybe you view it differently.
Oh okay, so he hasn't done it yet and you'd disapprove if he did? I'm not sure how I had things flippedI don’t think you understand what I said, because the last line of this post implies the exact opposite of what I said.
In this case then, why don't colleges just ask exactly what they mean to say? Why the whole "read between the lines" game?
If you want to know whether or not somebody is black, ask them if they're black. I don't see how it's exactly fair to ask if somebody is African-American and then ding them for answering correctly.
"Black, African-American, Afro-Caribbean"Agreed. Why ask a question where the literal correct answer is considered to be disingenuous because "everyone knows" that the question doesn't actually mean what it says? Just ask the question that you actually want the answer to. Say "black" if that is what you mean.
I've never once heard this before, but I guess that might just be me
In that case then it's equally likely that it might just be me too lol. I'm basing that question off my best friend who is in the situation I described, and people get confused when he says "Washington" instead of "Thailand".
Oh okay, so he hasn't done it yet and you'd disapprove if he did? I'm not sure how I had things flipped
Because that makes the racial discrimination a little more obviousAgreed. Why ask a question where the literal correct answer is considered to be disingenuous because "everyone knows" that the question doesn't actually mean what it says? Just ask the question that you actually want the answer to. Say "black" if that is what you mean.
no.I could honestly see someone from Egypt listing themselves as African by mistake. I mean, Egypt is technically in Africa, so for someone who isn't educated about what URM really means, it might seem reasonable to say you're African.
In this case then, why don't colleges just ask exactly what they mean to say? Why the whole "read between the lines" game?
If you want to know whether or not somebody is black, ask them if they're black. I don't see how it's exactly fair to ask if somebody is African-American and then ding them for answering correctly.
But failure to understand this suggests a profound lack of cultural knowledge lol, which doesn't reflect well on them eitherI could honestly see someone from Egypt listing themselves as African by mistake. I mean, Egypt is technically in Africa, so for someone who isn't educated about what URM really means, it might seem reasonable to say you're African.
But failure to understand this suggests a profound lack of cultural knowledge lol, which doesn't reflect well on them either
Lol if people ask if you're Black/African-American you should understand that they aren't asking if you're from an Arabic country. This is some pretty damn basic cultural knowledge, obvious implications, that comes with living in the US for a period of time and most teenagers should be able to understand this.Lol I'd guess that a significant portion of this country could not tell you which continent Egypt is in, let alone know the cultural nuances of Middle Eastern vs. North African. I really don't think that's a "profound lack of cultural knowledge".
It's happened to me before (and some of my friends). Whenever people ask me where I'm from, I say I'm from [state]. Then, sometimes some people follow up with something like, "no, where are you really from?" That's when I realize they mean where my parents are from, aka my ethnicity. The nuances of language...
If AMCAS does not want this to continue, they need to create a separate category for Middle Easterners/North Africans.
Eh. If you are a Boer that has been in South Africa longer then America had existed I dont see why not. IMO African Americans who are direct descendants of slaves or who immigrated during segregation are a much more disadvantaged group then most African immigrants. Though usually a lot of the above can also have many interesting stories and perspectives that would benefit them during interviews and during their work as a physician.That's also disingenuous.
They don’t actually, since the racial classifications “white” and “Caucasian” specifically include Arab and Middle Easterners.
It’s almost like race is poor choice of ways to choose preferential treatment of applicants ( /sarc)Yeah I am aware that they lump Middle Easternerswith European but it’s really not the best classification system
It’s almost like race is poor choice of ways to choose preferential treatment of applicants ( /sarc)
All that means is patients are racist, which shouldn’t be coddled tooI kind of agree, but there is legit evidence that minority patients respond better and are more compliant when their doctor is of the same ethnicity. And since those ethnicities are underrepresented, they are given a bonus to recruit them.
"I'm Indian but I look Latino and I grew up in a Latino community, and I URM????"
"I'm Egyptian, can I put that I'm African to be URM???"
"I'm a quarter Latino, can I be considered URM??"
All that means is patients are racist, which shouldn’t be coddled too
It would inappropriate for a hosptial in vermont to discriminate agaisnt black doctors because “but our patients prefer white people”
We don’t actually need doctors of all backgrounds, we just need the best and brightest who are actually capable of being nice humans. It’s absurd to propose that we need to demographic match providers to patients as though people can’t possible just get along with someone different than themself.What are you talking about? When you come from a black low SES community and you’re doctor is an upper class white dude, are you going to think he gets you and what your life is like? No. Relating to someone who is like you isn’t racism.
Second, your RAA attempt fails, because the argument is that we need doctors of all backgrounds, not just some.
We don’t actually need doctors of all backgrounds, we just need the best and brightest who are actually capable of being nice humans. It’s absurd to propose that we need to demographic match providers to patients as though people can’t possible just get along with someone different than themself.
Imagine the absurdity of a white old monied patient denying a 1st gen nigerian american doc because the doc doesn’t “get him and what his life is like”.
It’s not “reverse racism”, it’s just plain old racial discrimination either way
Lack of discrimination is good, diversity in an of itself is meaninglessNot all discrimination is racist. Wanting a doctor who understands your background isn’t racist. When you grow up in a ****ty neighborhood and don’t make enough money to eat healthy, you are probably not going to relate very well with the white doc who grew up with money. If you’re a Mexican immigrant, you are probably going to relate better to a Mexican doctor, whether he’s first generation or not.
It is definitely bias, but that’s not the same as racism. That we say it’s arbitrarily not okay for white people to do that might be racist, but that doesn’t mean we say Mexicans can’t want a Mexican doctor. It’s a separate issue.
And diversity is good. So yes, we actually do want doctors from all backgrounds. Having doctors from all backgrounds and bright doctors are not mutually exclusive.
Lack of discrimination is good, diversity in an of itself is meaningless
Because racial variation is not important. Skill and knowledge and ability to work with others are the only parts that matterDiscrimination isn’t necessarily good or bad. You discriminate when you make a judgement on a patient.
Diversity for diversity’s sake is meaningless, but you essentially ignored a huge part of what I said to make that argument. Diversity so that we have doctors bringing varied experiences into medicine so that patients can better relate to their doctors or so they may see something in a patient others don’t is not diversity for diversity’s sake. I’m not sure how you could possibly argue that wanting a more varied pool of doctors is a bad thing.
Because racial variation is not important. Skill and knowledge and ability to work with others are the only parts that matter
You might be surprised.
I really hope this isn’t based solely on appearance. As a Latina (although not URM) with lighter skin and eyes, I would disappointed if someone doubted my heritage because I didn’t “look” like it.
Or an old friend of mine (not premed, but still) who is 100% mexican, but is actually albino so he has full pale skin/blonde hairSay you were to encounter someone similar to her and you felt they were "spinning" that URM question and they didn't fit your perception of what a URM is. What then?