- Joined
- Sep 17, 2002
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello everyone.
I am trying to advise a friend on the following situation and am hoping for some feedback more knowledgeable than my own.
My friend had placed several generic letters of rec in her credential file as an undergrad. The people who wrote on her behalf were people who knew her well and could have raved not only generically, but could also specifically have attested to her suitability for a career as a physician. However, when she applied this cycle, she avoided inconveniencing them by simply using whatever generally praiseful letters had been collected a few years ago, before she graduated from school.
Judging from her stats (37 MCAT, 3.86 GPA), along with her research activities (she's been published several times) and extracurriculars, I can't imagine why, besides these letters not being specific and personal enough, she isn't having the success that our other friends are in this process.
THE QUESTION IS THIS: Should she do either of the following:
1- have one or more recommenders who wrote letters that went to schools now write revised, personal versions, that she can send along now, as she waits for word from the schools where she did interview
2- have another recommender, like a current employer who didn't write, now write and be specific about her suitedness for medicine? This person would be less knowledgeable, but would at least be a different reference.
I appreciate whatever advice you have. My friend is kind of beating herself up about not having gotten the letters updated by the writers in the first place ... so if there's any way to make that regret productive, I'd like to help her do so. She's going to be a great doctor.
Thank you.
I am trying to advise a friend on the following situation and am hoping for some feedback more knowledgeable than my own.
My friend had placed several generic letters of rec in her credential file as an undergrad. The people who wrote on her behalf were people who knew her well and could have raved not only generically, but could also specifically have attested to her suitability for a career as a physician. However, when she applied this cycle, she avoided inconveniencing them by simply using whatever generally praiseful letters had been collected a few years ago, before she graduated from school.
Judging from her stats (37 MCAT, 3.86 GPA), along with her research activities (she's been published several times) and extracurriculars, I can't imagine why, besides these letters not being specific and personal enough, she isn't having the success that our other friends are in this process.
THE QUESTION IS THIS: Should she do either of the following:
1- have one or more recommenders who wrote letters that went to schools now write revised, personal versions, that she can send along now, as she waits for word from the schools where she did interview
2- have another recommender, like a current employer who didn't write, now write and be specific about her suitedness for medicine? This person would be less knowledgeable, but would at least be a different reference.
I appreciate whatever advice you have. My friend is kind of beating herself up about not having gotten the letters updated by the writers in the first place ... so if there's any way to make that regret productive, I'd like to help her do so. She's going to be a great doctor.
Thank you.