AFD enjoy: robots to fill the 555 emergency medicine vacancies (says Google Bard)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.


Admissions advisor
Staff member
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Oct 14, 2011
Reaction score
Bard writes...

The year is 2043. The world is in the midst of a healthcare crisis. There are not enough doctors to meet the needs of the population. In an effort to address this shortage, the government has decided to fill 555 emergency department residency slots with robot surgeons.

The decision has been met with mixed reactions. Some people believe that robot surgeons are the future of healthcare. They argue that they are more precise and efficient than human surgeons. They also point out that they do not make mistakes due to fatigue or stress.

Others are concerned about the implications of having robot surgeons perform surgery. They worry that it will lead to job losses for human surgeons. They also argue that robot surgeons lack the human touch that is essential for providing quality care.

Only time will tell how the decision to fill 555 emergency department residency slots with robot surgeons will impact the future of healthcare.

Here is a possible story about how it might play out:

Dr. Sandra Miller was one of the first human surgeons to be replaced by a robot. She had been working in the emergency department for over 20 years and had seen her fair share of injuries and illnesses. But nothing could have prepared her for the day when she was replaced by a machine.

It all started when the hospital announced that it was going to be using robot surgeons in the emergency department. Dr. Miller was shocked and angry. She felt like she was being replaced by a machine that couldn't possibly understand the human body the way she did.

But the hospital was adamant that the robot surgeons were the future of healthcare. They were more precise and efficient than human surgeons, and they never made mistakes. Dr. Miller knew that she was fighting a losing battle, so she reluctantly retired.

In the months that followed, Dr. Miller watched as the robot surgeons took over her job. She saw them perform surgery after surgery, and she was amazed by their skill and precision. But she also saw the toll that it took on them. The robot surgeons were constantly working, and they never seemed to rest. Dr. Miller knew that they couldn't keep up this pace for long.

One day, Dr. Miller was called to the emergency department to consult on a case. When she arrived, she saw that the robot surgeons were working on a patient who had been in a car accident. The patient was in critical condition, and the robot surgeons were struggling to save him. Dr. Miller knew that she had to help, so she stepped in and took over the surgery.

Dr. Miller was able to save the patient's life, but she knew that this was just a temporary solution. The robot surgeons were still needed, but they couldn't be relied on to perform surgery all the time. Dr. Miller realized that the future of healthcare was not about machines or humans, but about working together to provide the best possible care for patients.

Dr. Miller retired for a second time, but this time she didn't leave the hospital. She stayed on as a consultant, and she worked with the robot surgeons to improve their skills. She also started a program to train new human surgeons who could work alongside the robots.

Dr. Miller's program was a success, and soon the hospital had a team of human and robot surgeons who were working together to provide the best possible care for patients. Dr. Miller was proud of what she had accomplished, and she knew that she had helped to shape the future of healthcare.

Members don't see this ad.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
On a similar note - when you tell the patient that the surgery will be performed by the DaVinci robot - the number of patients who think that there will be no human involvement is astounding.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user