Ok all, I'm concerned I may be looking at something wrong and would like some feedback. . . either slap me in the face with reality, or reassure me I'm looking at it correctly. . .
I understand there are people that come out of medical school with families and/or other significant additional financial responsibilities. . . this does not refer to them. . .
For those that are able to come out of medical school and residency and for a couple years live like you made 50K a year. . . couldn't you repay your loans in about 2 years? Why is everyone talking about paying loans over 10 years? That just sounds like an enormous waste of money in interest. . . I know you're all probably smarter than to be throwing that money away, so I'm wondering what it is I'm missing. Here's how I'm planning things (roughly). . .
200,000 from medical school, and an additional 50,000 from interest if I put off paying those loans until I'm done with residency (I don't know enough about the IBR and other programs to factor that possibility into my equation yet). So that's 250,000 total. I'm planning as of now to go into emergency medicine, and from what I'm researching I'd say 225,000/year is a fair estimate. . . In two years I'd make 450,000. . . minus 100,000 in taxes that's 350,000. . . minus another 100,000 (living a 50,000/yr lifestyle) that's 250,000. . . the amount of my loan was 250,000. . .
So. . . looking at that option, and of course I realize there may be +/- here and there, I find myself wondering why SO many people are talking about 10yr+ repayment. . . I can't imagine all of these people have kids. . . and even if they did, I know plenty of people that live (albeit conservatively) with 1 or 2 kids off of 50K a year. Why isn't it more standard to pay of your loans in 2-3 years?
What am I missing?
I understand there are people that come out of medical school with families and/or other significant additional financial responsibilities. . . this does not refer to them. . .
For those that are able to come out of medical school and residency and for a couple years live like you made 50K a year. . . couldn't you repay your loans in about 2 years? Why is everyone talking about paying loans over 10 years? That just sounds like an enormous waste of money in interest. . . I know you're all probably smarter than to be throwing that money away, so I'm wondering what it is I'm missing. Here's how I'm planning things (roughly). . .
200,000 from medical school, and an additional 50,000 from interest if I put off paying those loans until I'm done with residency (I don't know enough about the IBR and other programs to factor that possibility into my equation yet). So that's 250,000 total. I'm planning as of now to go into emergency medicine, and from what I'm researching I'd say 225,000/year is a fair estimate. . . In two years I'd make 450,000. . . minus 100,000 in taxes that's 350,000. . . minus another 100,000 (living a 50,000/yr lifestyle) that's 250,000. . . the amount of my loan was 250,000. . .
So. . . looking at that option, and of course I realize there may be +/- here and there, I find myself wondering why SO many people are talking about 10yr+ repayment. . . I can't imagine all of these people have kids. . . and even if they did, I know plenty of people that live (albeit conservatively) with 1 or 2 kids off of 50K a year. Why isn't it more standard to pay of your loans in 2-3 years?
What am I missing?