- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 901
- Reaction score
- 1,260
It's already hard enough doing "mac" cases on >300lb patients on a near daily basis. This just adds another painful layer. Well now I can insist on GETA, I guess.
Not sure if serious. Have you ever taken a colon prep? Yes, I get it they can still aspirate especially when 2 techs are standing on the protuberant belly.I dunno how often I can get away with canceling EGDs and screening colonoscopies in anticipation of bariatric surgery because they took their ozempic/wegovy within a week of scope and surgeons office never informed them to stop. Also never saw a GI suite with a readily available ultrasound to check for gastric contents.
It's already hard enough doing "mac" cases on >300lb patients on a near daily basis. This just adds another painful layer. Well now I can insist on GETA, I guess.
They should have titled this paper "GLP agonists- Get Suxxed!"
Not sure if serious. Have you ever taken a colon prep? Yes, I get it they can still aspirate especially when 2 techs are standing on the protuberant belly.
And who does a screening colonoscopy prior to bariatric surgery? Never seen this before.
Not sure if serious. Have you ever taken a colon prep? Yes, I get it they can still aspirate especially when 2 techs are standing on the protuberant belly.
And who does a screening colonoscopy prior to bariatric surgery? Never seen this before.
im surprised they are making an official stance without clear evidence and only anecdotal tales
im surprised they are making an official stance without clear evidence and only anecdotal tales
And there’s your answer. 😁Well now I can insist on GETA, I guess.
They should have titled this paper "GLP agonists- Get Suxxed!"
What are you guys doing with these new guidelines? Our group is discussing what to do . Some of the anesthesiologists just want to extend npo time rather than hold the medications as we are getting push back from the gi docs. This makes me uneasy but I’m the new guy at the shop so don’t really want to rock the boat. If it were up to me I would just follow the asa guidelines and hold the medications. Both of our Endo centers also don’t have ultrasound which I wouldn’t feel comfortable relying on anyway as I’m not used to doing gastric ultrasounds.
PropWhat are you guys doing with these new guidelines? Our group is discussing what to do . Some of the anesthesiologists just want to extend npo time rather than hold the medications as we are getting push back from the gi docs. This makes me uneasy but I’m the new guy at the shop so don’t really want to rock the boat. If it were up to me I would just follow the asa guidelines and hold the medications. Both of our Endo centers also don’t have ultrasound which I wouldn’t feel comfortable relying on anyway as I’m not used to doing gastric ultrasounds.
Prop
Sux
Tube
Bring some dantrolene?I wanted to specify for our outpatient gi centers.
We started noticing issues months ago when we had a couple colonoscopies vomit solid food products and saw significant gastric volumes on EGDs for patients who took ozempic. Granted we are in a hospital with a separate GI suite that has the capability to intubate any patient as needed. I would argue that you aren’t just following society recommendations or something arbitrary like running sevo at >2 L/min flows since there has been a widely observed risk for this patient population. I agree that it would look pretty bad if no additional precautions are taken given the new document.I’m in private practice so not really sure how feasible to treat every patient that doesn’t hold their medications as full stomach. A significant number of patients are on this right now for weight loss. I pretty much have to cancel the case since we don’t intubate per policy. If we do proceed with the case against the recommendations how defensible is it in court. I’m guessing it will look pretty bad if we go against our own society recommendations.
We told them there’s a difference between waiting a couple hours vs waiting a week. But we have reasonable GI docs who appreciate limited shared liabilityAnybody else concerned that just intubating will lead to surgeons/proceduralists expecting us to do the same for other NPO non adherence? I’m being understanding for now since it’s new for everyone, but it seems odd to “just intubate” a full stomach for an elective procedure
What about other outpatient procedures? When they have hospital admission pre authorized? Or when they’re trying to get a surgery in at the end of the year?We told them there’s a difference between waiting a couple hours vs waiting a week. But we have reasonable GI docs who appreciate limited shared liability
We have been working with our pre-admission testing clinic to communicate with patients and surgeons the risks and preference to hold them for at least a week when possible. For those who don’t have sufficient time (or their endocrinologist is unable to bridge them) we RSI. It’s not perfect but we feel it shows we’re controlling what we’re reasonably able to control to mitigate risk as much as possible.What about other outpatient procedures? When they have hospital admission pre authorized? Or when they’re trying to get a surgery in at the end of the year?
I’m not being intentionally obtuse or argumentative. And I get that there’s a difference between the surgeons clinic dropping the ball and the patient eating a breakfast burrito on the way in. But this has typically been a slam dunk board scenario. It’s an optimizable condition to decrease risk of aspiration and death in an elective procedure.
Our group has made a list of meds and helped pre op offices give better instruction. Ultimately I think that will be the best solution.
“Lung tissue is fragile and precious,” George said. “If anything goes into the lungs, at best, it’s a cough, at worse, you end up on a ventilator for an extended period of time,” she said.
Actually, at worst, the patient develops severe ARDS and dies.
Regional anesthesiologist, probably lots of blocks and not a lot of ICU patients 😆“Lung tissue is fragile and precious,” George said. “If anything goes into the lungs, at best, it’s a cough, at worse, you end up on a ventilator for an extended period of time,” she said.
Actually, at worst, the patient develops severe ARDS and dies.
My department has implemented the guidance from ASA. It's still up to each doc but hard to defend a bad outcome if you don't follow the guidance.