- Joined
- May 27, 2005
- Messages
- 984
- Reaction score
- 10
Would appreciate any responses 🙂
Nice try, but you'll likely not get a lot of responses as openly discussing salary is typically frowned upon. I could be wrong.
Here is a an easier way to find this:
http://www1.salary.com/Psychiatrist-salary.html
http://www.healthcaresalaryonline.com/psychiatrist-salary.html
http://www.psychiatristsalary101.com/
Being an anonymous survey, it's not really an open question. And it's useful information to give to your colleagues who are starting out in their career. Some of us don't have trust funds or spouses who are physicians, so knowing people's salaries is important to us. This whole talking about money is unseemly thing usually seems to be used by those who have the least cause to worry about money.
Being an anonymous survey, it's not really an open question.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't believe the survey is anonymous b/c you can see who responded to what if you're signed in.
Here's the MDscape link: http://www.medscape.com/sites/public/physician-comp/2011
Nonsense. Go to a random buddy's house over the holidays and ask one of his uncles or aunts how much money they make. Get prepared for the sound of a skipped record. This has nothing to do with folks being rich or poor. It's just considered rude to ask someone how much money they make, regardless of how much you or they make. I'll tell a trusted friend, but for anyone else, it's just none of their business.This whole talking about money is unseemly thing usually seems to be used by those who have the least cause to worry about money.
my private patients will freely discuss sexual fantasies, felonies, and indiscretions of all sorts, but rarely does someone mention a salary.
I don't think anyone is implying at all that people shouldn't be concerned about money. But not wanting to disclose your salary on an SDN poll isn't elitist, it's just private. Besides, the data listed in the various salary surveys available is a lot more telling than what 10 or 15 people answer on an SDN poll.You're right that it's transgressive in casual conversation, but the implication that people shouldn't be concerned about money (which you make by not talking about it anonymously with your future colleagues) is a little elitist.
The salary surveys, like the one posted here, might be a better source:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=16721&d=1304153086
The salary question is a reasonable one. There is a very big range and the upper end is very broad. Also, there is the business aspect of medicine and the clinical aspect of medicine. The clinical will generate a very limited range of revenue per unit of time but the net take home can vary dramatically depending on the waste. Reinvestment of income into non medical arenas can also be very beneficial as it allows you to protect income from taxation and create long term assets/revenue generators (buildings that generate rent and lower your overhead).
But I will answer your question bluntly, this is in California. I and every other psychiatrist in our group except our latest hire (less than a month) make more than 350k. Our newest hire will probably get there in less than a year. Most of our psychiatrists and other physicians see patients for about 45-50 hours a week. There are psychiatrists that see patients for 60-70 hours a week and make upwards of 500k or more.
Subspecialties like forensics and child also do very well because they tend to have a decent cash component. Sleep and pain have a large procedure component so they also do well. Gero-psych can do well if you have contracts with nursing homes and you do it with NPs/PAs but it can get you in trouble so we stay away. In private practice, the real way to make more money is to work more hours. Your overhead generally is fairly static so the more you work, the greater percentage goes in your pocket.
The HMOs, county, hospital based groups around here pay anywhere from 170-190 for CMHCs to something like Kaiser which can pay in the low 300s for a partnered physician with bonuses and some overtime. Academics pay low to mid 100s for assistant professor, high 100s for associate and low 200s for full professor. 'Senior clinical instructors' are lucky to get 6 figures. There are a couple of big psychiatry groups that do very well, probably better than us per unit time because they have better negotiating power. There are also a lot of solo practitioners who are doing ok, probably making in the mid 100s to a variety of upper range (the pure cash ones do very well but its rare) but they are their own boss and relatively happy.
I don't think anyone is implying at all that people shouldn't be concerned about money. But not wanting to disclose your salary on an SDN poll isn't elitist, it's just private. Besides, the data listed in the various salary surveys available is a lot more telling than what 10 or 15 people answer on an SDN poll.
That's a very interesting brake down of salaries. Do you know where the data comes from? Interesting that, even though the n =11, geriatric psychiatrist had the highest mean at $234. Not sure that stands up to the common thinking regarding what the different subspecialties make.
Awesome reply. Thanks for taking the time to type it out. I had no idea academic salaries differed that much from the norm. Jeez.
The salary question is a reasonable one. There is a very big range and the upper end is very broad. Also, there is the business aspect of medicine and the clinical aspect of medicine. The clinical will generate a very limited range of revenue per unit of time but the net take home can vary dramatically depending on the waste. Reinvestment of income into non medical arenas can also be very beneficial as it allows you to protect income from taxation and create long term assets/revenue generators (buildings that generate rent and lower your overhead).
But I will answer your question bluntly, this is in California. I and every other psychiatrist in our group except our latest hire (less than a month) make more than 350k. Our newest hire will probably get there in less than a year. Most of our psychiatrists and other physicians see patients for about 45-50 hours a week. There are psychiatrists that see patients for 60-70 hours a week and make upwards of 500k or more.
Subspecialties like forensics and child also do very well because they tend to have a decent cash component. Sleep and pain have a large procedure component so they also do well. Gero-psych can do well if you have contracts with nursing homes and you do it with NPs/PAs but it can get you in trouble so we stay away. In private practice, the real way to make more money is to work more hours. Your overhead generally is fairly static so the more you work, the greater percentage goes in your pocket.
The HMOs, county, hospital based groups around here pay anywhere from 170-190 for CMHCs to something like Kaiser which can pay in the low 300s for a partnered physician with bonuses and some overtime. Academics pay low to mid 100s for assistant professor, high 100s for associate and low 200s for full professor. 'Senior clinical instructors' are lucky to get 6 figures. There are a couple of big psychiatry groups that do very well, probably better than us per unit time because they have better negotiating power. There are also a lot of solo practitioners who are doing ok, probably making in the mid 100s to a variety of upper range (the pure cash ones do very well but its rare) but they are their own boss and relatively happy.
I think the salary for psychiatrists in california is higher than average. Academic salaries however may actually be lower or on par compared to average. This is probably due to the patient population being mostly medical/indigent for academic centers and the 'premium' UCs, Stanfords etc expect people to pay for the privilege of working for them. There are exceptions to these rules and chairs, dept heads, directors get paid more but that comes with its own extra set of headaches.
The salary question is a reasonable one. There is a very big range and the upper end is very broad. Also, there is the business aspect of medicine and the clinical aspect of medicine. The clinical will generate a very limited range of revenue per unit of time but the net take home can vary dramatically depending on the waste. Reinvestment of income into non medical arenas can also be very beneficial as it allows you to protect income from taxation and create long term assets/revenue generators (buildings that generate rent and lower your overhead).
But I will answer your question bluntly, this is in California. I and every other psychiatrist in our group except our latest hire (less than a month) make more than 350k. Our newest hire will probably get there in less than a year. Most of our psychiatrists and other physicians see patients for about 45-50 hours a week. There are psychiatrists that see patients for 60-70 hours a week and make upwards of 500k or more.
Subspecialties like forensics and child also do very well because they tend to have a decent cash component. Sleep and pain have a large procedure component so they also do well. Gero-psych can do well if you have contracts with nursing homes and you do it with NPs/PAs but it can get you in trouble so we stay away. In private practice, the real way to make more money is to work more hours. Your overhead generally is fairly static so the more you work, the greater percentage goes in your pocket.
The HMOs, county, hospital based groups around here pay anywhere from 170-190 for CMHCs to something like Kaiser which can pay in the low 300s for a partnered physician with bonuses and some overtime. Academics pay low to mid 100s for assistant professor, high 100s for associate and low 200s for full professor. 'Senior clinical instructors' are lucky to get 6 figures. There are a couple of big psychiatry groups that do very well, probably better than us per unit time because they have better negotiating power. There are also a lot of solo practitioners who are doing ok, probably making in the mid 100s to a variety of upper range (the pure cash ones do very well but its rare) but they are their own boss and relatively happy.
Let me just add that on the other forums here on SDN not related to psych, salary is openly talked about.
"I only make a paltry 80k per year and I work 80 hours per week to do that. Plus, I have to do sooo much paperwork, and the midlevels are all going to take our jobs. Avoid psych at all costs."
NO ONE is making over 100k per year. No one. Anywhere. In the world. And psychiatrists get attacked by their patients (and hospital security, apparently 🙄). This job sucks, nothing to see here. Move along. These aren't the droids you're looking for.
I would rather we NOT talk about it until after this years' match.
In fact, if you read what manic sleep really said:
If it doesn't say that now, it's because some hacker changed it...but that's the way things are in psych. NO ONE is making over 100k per year. No one. Anywhere. In the world. And psychiatrists get attacked by their patients (and hospital security, apparently 🙄). This job sucks, nothing to see here. Move along. These aren't the droids you're looking for.
But I will answer your question bluntly, this is in California. I and every other psychiatrist in our group except our latest hire (less than a month) make more than 350k.
I remember academic and CMHC jobs paying around 90k as I finished training (2001) which was barely more than I was earning as a PGY5 fellow with moonlighting pay.
With my med school loans, I couldn't have afforded those jobs even if I'd wanted to take them.
Good pay is out there. You just have to search, be picky, patient and work hard (and be good at your job).
I work in a private practice setting and moonlight every other weekend as I build up my practice. The moonlighting gig should bring in about 100k and the private practice another 200k at my current rate and more if I keep growing. I am quickly building my patient load and am at about 30 hours worth (3 full days worth) right now. The growth is slowing a little but I should be above 40 by December. My payor mix early on was a lot of medicare so it was mostly med management. My new patients are PPO and some self pay so I'm gonna drop the moonlighting after I pass 4 days a week. I do general adult psychiatry with a fair amount of psychotherapy and groups. 300k is very attainable as long as you supplement with moonlighting and are willing to work the hours and keep your skills up to par.
Here's the MDscape link: http://www.medscape.com/sites/public/physician-comp/2011
Excellent link - better info than could be garnered from an SDN poll!
Thank you for sharing this.
At least around here, academic psychiatrists have a salary that might be 130-200K, depending on rank and institution, but they can then make significantly more through private practice within the physician's organization. It might not rival the salaries made in FT private practices that focus on making maximal profits, but they can certainly rival and/or beat the typical psychiatrist when various benefits are added in. The hours can be long, but the job satisfaction can be very high.
At least around here, academic psychiatrists have a salary that might be 130-200K, depending on rank and institution, but they can then make significantly more through private practice within the physician's organization. It might not rival the salaries made in FT private practices that focus on making maximal profits, but they can certainly rival and/or beat the typical psychiatrist when various benefits are added in. The hours can be long, but the job satisfaction can be very high.
I trained in the Bay Area, and salaries for HMO jobs there seemed lower than what they're paying up here in the NW. I did hear that since the CA prisons upped their starting salaries to the $225ish range, that Kaiser et al down there would have to follow suite, but I don't know if that's happened.
Manicsleep, are all your colleagues sleep docs as well? I have a colleague here who did a sleep fellowship and said that sleep jobs are hard to find, and since the technology is there to do effective sleep studies at home, she's feeling like it's a dying field. She's worked in academics part time.
Maybe one day I'll get brave/motivated enough to do PP. Right now though, the extra hrs + huge paperwork hassle seem to offset the salary increase. Esp since I have zero interest in working more than 40 hrs/week.
I'm kind of curious how this works. Are there any obligations required to remain on the faculty? Do you have to publish, or put in X number of hours in the inpatient/CPEP/clinic?
I would imagine this is also a pretty legit source - http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes291066.htm
SoCal Kaiser hires in the low 180's plus benefits, partner track, plus 25k signing bonus (or so per year), advancing to 225-ish once partner in 3 years.
In LA county right now the salary (publicly available) is 11282.00 - 15624.00/mo, plus 5.5% for boards. Plus health benefits, retirement, pension, sick time, paid vacation. Most psychiatrists get hired in at the max starting salary. Then there's my private practice...
just wondering jetta what did you decide to do a fellowship in??
However, I've seen many psychiatrists far surpass other specialists in yearly income with other business ventures.