- Joined
- Mar 30, 2014
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 11
God I don't want this to sound pretentious, but I know it's going to -_-;; I have supervisors and PIs who I am very well-acquainted with, and they have graduated from and worked with people from highly respected universities (PhDs and/or MDs from Cambridge, Johns Hopkins, Harvard, Northwestern, University College London to name a few). Likewise, they are very well known in their fields of expertise both domestically and internationally. Not to mention a good portion of them are directors of particular schools or departments at universities. I am certainly asking them to write letters for me, and I know that they are going to speak very highly of me based on my accomplishments and conversations with them. I'm curious to what degree you might consider an applicant who has letters from individuals like some of my letter writers as opposed to someone who might just have "generic" letters from professors they took classes from. I should mention that it was mostly by chance that I became acquainted with these people as opposed to seeking them out purely for their status. I imagine since I've be acquainted with my letter writers for quite a while and have worked with them full-time that they will be able to say more about my competencies than a typical applicant.
I ask because my GPA is phenomenal, my ECs are exceptional, my clinical experience is excellent, but my MCAT is meh.... My practice test average is through the roof, but I can't even break 30 on the real deal :\ My verbal tanked on test day, so I'm retaking it. Not to mention I've tutored physics and chem for four-five years, I read furiously, and I've been in biomed research for years. I submit regularly to a global health journal, and I've got research publications on the way. I know I'm capable of a medical education, but my MCAT apparently isn't reflecting that, which is really bothering me.
Or more simply: Does the reputation of the letter writer play a part in the decision factor? Would my letters be able to compensate at all for sub-par MCAT scores...
Curious for your input. :]
I ask because my GPA is phenomenal, my ECs are exceptional, my clinical experience is excellent, but my MCAT is meh.... My practice test average is through the roof, but I can't even break 30 on the real deal :\ My verbal tanked on test day, so I'm retaking it. Not to mention I've tutored physics and chem for four-five years, I read furiously, and I've been in biomed research for years. I submit regularly to a global health journal, and I've got research publications on the way. I know I'm capable of a medical education, but my MCAT apparently isn't reflecting that, which is really bothering me.
Or more simply: Does the reputation of the letter writer play a part in the decision factor? Would my letters be able to compensate at all for sub-par MCAT scores...
Curious for your input. :]
Last edited: