So I was browsing the Student researching forums and I came across this thread:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/journal-targets-increasing-your-research-output.1073599/
I was wondering, for medical school admissions would a school be more impressed by a first author publications in less prestigious journals (F1000, PLoS) or 1 second author publication in a more well known and prestigious journal?
The answers in the above thread are given from a non-premedical perspective, and I can understand the reasoning behind why when competing for residencies quality is more important than quantity. However, as an undergraduate isn't the point of research (in regards to medical school admissions) to clearly demonstrate that you know what it takes to be a successful scientist? Even if papers are not published in fancy journals (Journal of Food Protection, International Journal of Food Microbiology), wouldn't they still show that the undergraduate student that did the work knows how to take a project through analysis, writing, and the various steps of publication?
The reason I was curious is because I was debating eventually submitting a manuscript to F1000 for the turnaround time.
To that extent, how do medical schools feel about applicants publishing case reports? I realize more is better than none, but I was debating spending my time attempting to write one. I realize they are not given much weight in residency applications, but what about medical school?