Your information also sounds correct, I can add a little to it. I agree with the fact that if you are fingerprinted as a juvenile your information may show up in CJIS. However, I would like to further clarify. Most crimes that juveniles are arrested for do not require fingerprinting. For example, if anyone here was ever arrested for curfew, shoplifting, possession of drug paraphernalia, etc, you were probably not fingerprinted. Again, I hate to keep defaulting to this, but
it varies by state
In Minnesota for example, the law clearly defines when I can and cannot bring a juvenile to booking for fingerprints, photographs, palm prints etc. Since I don't have exact numbers I won't throw out a percent, but I can confidently say that the percent of juveniles that are arrested and then subsequently fingerprinted is low.
If you wish to research the procedures in your own state, they can be found under the section of law called the Rules of Criminal Procedure, or something similar.
I'm trying to clear this up a little bit at a time so that people actually have something slightly more concrete to reference, but it seems like a monumental task.
I have investigated cases involving medical professionals who comitted crimes, and dealing with the boards is very interesting. The boards are way more strict than the law. There have been cases where the physician's behaviors fell below the level of a crime, but the boards still take significant action. Also, in MN, the boards (medical, social worker, nursing etc) are granted basically full access to all of the materials that are part of my investigation as I am conducting it. This is unheard of for most other agencies, at least until the investigation is complete.