Anti-periplanar question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Piepiesuperpie

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
50
Reaction score
3
Points
4,591
  1. Pre-Dental
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
16x6ADN.png


Can someone explain this to me? I drew the most stable conformation (anti with the CH3s 180 from each other) and the Br and the beta hydrogen were perfectly 180, so I thought that it E2 would produce the major product.
 
The question asks what best describes THIS structure in the specifically shown conformation though, so you shouldn't actually be rotating it, but evaluating it as is. It's the least stable because in the shown conformation, the bulky groups are not positioned anti (in fact they are gauche, in a Newman projection).

What I don't get is why this leads to the minor product, because I don't see how a minor product can even form. There's only one carbon with beta hydrogens attached, so there's only one possible E2 product here regardless.
 
Last edited:
Haha, wow, totally missed that.

As for the minor product, even though it's the same product at the end, the mechanism of using the less stable conformation then producing the product happens less often than reactant --> (most stable conformation) --> product. Although the product is the same, the way the reaction proceeds is slightly different.
 
Top Bottom