- Joined
- Mar 1, 2005
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0


MrBurns10 said:I actually have a semi-off-topic question...only Puerto Ricans, Cubans, and Mexicans are considered URM, right? I'm a South American latina so I don't think I'm considered URM, but I got called in to talk to the diversity lady at Wake Forest when I don't think the Asian girl who was there did. Anybody have any idea?
Los5272 said:Just wondering if there were any latinos/hispanics accepted to medical school this year and what are the best schools for latinos/hispanics to apply at!! Please describe a little bit about your qualifications. Gracias por sus consejos y ayuda!!

MrBurns10 said:I actually have a semi-off-topic question...only Puerto Ricans, Cubans, and Mexicans are considered URM, right? I'm a South American latina so I don't think I'm considered URM, but I got called in to talk to the diversity lady at Wake Forest when I don't think the Asian girl who was there did. Anybody have any idea?
Do you think this goes across the board for all schools? I mean, like, could Wake be considering me URM while another school does not? haha, I wonder what the diversity woman was thinking when she was talking to me...I am quite possibly the palest latina I know.medhacker said:In the past Hispanic-URM was meant to be Mainland Puerto ricans, mexicans/chicanos only, no Cubans. Cubans are over-represented actually.
Nonetheless, with the last supreme court ruling, URM takes a twist and goes way beyond the former Hispanic-URM standard. Under the right conditions a So. American hispanic could be a Hispanic-URM.
MrBurns10 said:Do you think this goes across the board for all schools? I mean, like, could Wake be considering me URM while another school does not? haha, I wonder what the diversity woman was thinking when she was talking to me...I am quite possibly the palest latina I know.

Thanks for clearing all that up! Do you know where I could look that kind of info up by "jurisdiction?" I'm assuming that kind of info wouldnt be located in one place, but figured I'd ask just in case. Thanks again.medhacker said:Well, it is a decision by the supreme court of justice, so it has in fact become the law of the land. However, careful interpretation is needed. The new supreme court decision could make you an URM in Montana while not one in Miami. URM status now depends on if the minority group you belong to is under-represented in the area provided by the medical institution you belong to. That is the reason why Cubans are not URM in Miami under this supreme court decision and I am sure chicanos/mexicans are not in certain places as well. It now depends on whether you belong to a group medically under-served in the "jurisdiction" of the medical school in question.![]()
Los5272 said:what are the best schools for latinos/hispanics to apply at!!
MrBurns10 said:Thanks for clearing all that up! Do you know where I could look that kind of info up by "jurisdiction?" I'm assuming that kind of info wouldnt be located in one place, but figured I'd ask just in case. Thanks again.
Sorry to hijack your thread topic for a few posts there 🙂
juiceman311 said:Who do I pay off to be a URM? I know a kid who just now decided he wants to goto med school, he's Mexican, and he's a 4th year like me. We have similar GPA's and stuff, but I know he'll get in over me because he has that label. Even though this has been my dream, and he just randomly decided he wants to goto med school over grad school. Awesome, welcome to America. This URM thing is a load of crap. If your numbers aren't competitive, it doesn't matter if you're white black or anything in between, you're not qualified, that's that, try again like everyone else will be.
maxflash04 said:"Latino's stand up!" LOL
I'm white and really poor! 🙁willow18 said:Please stop with that. No point in flaunting your advantage to everyone else. I shan't go into details but believe me, i'm as disadvantaged relative to an education as any of you will ever be. I'm white, so I obviously don't fall in automatically under URM/disadvantaged, and I didn't apply as one on principle. I don't mean to start an entire battle here whether the whole thing is right or not, so lets not get into that. Just stop with the purple/white/brown/black/green "power" stuff.
(Ok, bring on the racist labels now.)
maxflash04 said:I'm white and really poor! 🙁
I'm under my parent's roof for now - I hate it!Sooz said:Tell me about it...Between my hubby and myself we will make less than 16k this year 🙁 Thank God we only have 1 kid to support huh.
WhatUpDoc! said:What if he gets in over you because you suck and he's a much better applicant overall 🙄 Naww... but you would never believe that right!?!?... I could, with comments like "URM thing is a load of crap," I'm pretty sure that's exactly what your medical career will amount to. Stop bitchin cuz you're worried about not getting in on your own credentials and then trying to blame it on AA. You just pulled a BITCH MOVE in the first degree... thank you, that is all 😀
WhatUpDoc! said:Stop bitchin cuz you're worried about not getting in on your own credentials and then trying to blame it on AA. You just pulled a BITCH MOVE in the first degree... thank you, that is all 😀
DarkFark said:umm.... all of them?
Does anyone else think this person might be a troll? Certainly looks like the type of post intended to rile up those who aren't keen on URM stuff.
WhatUpDoc! said:1000 words indeed 👍
Los5272 said:URM is there for a reason. It helps find people who are more likely to work in underrepresented areas. I don't agree in the way people take advantage of the status, but minorities are needed in medicine! Who do you think is gonna go to under represeted areas and help?! You?
This is exactly why I think affirmative action should be socioeconomic rather than racial. I went to a very preppy high school (hated it) and knew many minorities who had absolutely no disadvantages in terms of educational opportunities (their parents maybe, but not them). There are plenty of white kids who don't get the same educational opportunities as some well-off minorities because they are less financially advantaged...so in no way do I think the minority should benefit from affirmative action while the white person does not. That's one reason why I think the "disadvantaged status" for med school is a great idea. And, in my opinion, affirmative action by socioeconomic status would still benefit minorities because African-Americans, latinos, etc. still comprise a great percentage of the lesser advantaged population (unfortunately).MegG said:I went to a public school, which was comprised of about a 65-70% black student body. I am white but my family is very poor, so that means that (according to the picture you used) I was born on top of "the mountian"? 😕 I suppose I somehow had more opportunities than my fellow (black) students?
MrBurns10 said:This is exactly why I think affirmative action should be socioeconomic rather than racial. I went to a very preppy high school (hated it) and knew many minorities who had absolutely no disadvantages in terms of educational opportunities (their parents maybe, but not them). There are plenty of white kids who don't get the same educational opportunities as some well-off minorities because they are less financially advantaged...so in no way do I think the minority should benefit from affirmative action while the white person does not. That's one reason why I think the "disadvantaged status" for med school is a great idea. And, in my opinion, affirmative action by socioeconomic status would still benefit minorities because African-Americans, latinos, etc. still comprise a great percentage of the lesser advantaged population (unfortunately).
Keep in mind I am a minority...I did not post this from the perspective of a bitter white person, so please don't think I'm attacking minorities in the least here.
MrBurns10 said:This is exactly why I think affirmative action should be socioeconomic rather than racial. I went to a very preppy high school (hated it) and knew many minorities who had absolutely no disadvantages in terms of educational opportunities (their parents maybe, but not them). There are plenty of white kids who don't get the same educational opportunities as some well-off minorities because they are less financially advantaged...so in no way do I think the minority should benefit from affirmative action while the white person does not. That's one reason why I think the "disadvantaged status" for med school is a great idea. And, in my opinion, affirmative action by socioeconomic status would still benefit minorities because African-Americans, latinos, etc. still comprise a great percentage of the lesser advantaged population (unfortunately).
Keep in mind I am a minority...I did not post this from the perspective of a bitter white person, so please don't think I'm attacking minorities in the least here.
medhacker said:The new stand of AA does take in account exactly what you are proposing. Under the new stand (which is completely fair on my book), poster MegG (i think that is the nick) could very well be an URM. And justice for all...
Oh no, I didn't mean to imply at all that you sounded bitter! The thought absolutely never crossed my mind. I just thought you made a good point, and I wanted to make sure that after I posted such strong opinions that people wouldn't just assume I was a white person who was angry with affirmative action because I didn't benefit from it.MegG said:Well first, I don't think I'm bitter (if that was directed towards me, if not..sorry). But other than that I understand what you are saying, and it really makes a lot of sense. I appreciate your response to me, and think your ideas are great!
MrBurns10 said:Oh no, I didn't mean to imply at all that you sounded bitter! The thought absolutely never crossed my mind. I just thought you made a good point, and I wanted to make sure that after I posted such strong opinions that people wouldn't just assume I was a white person who was angry with affirmative action because I didn't benefit from it.
Sorry for any confusion 🙂
MrBurns10 said:affirmative action should be socioeconomic rather than racial
WhatUpDoc! said:Race and socioeconomic status are so closely tied together in this country that it is impossible to address one without the other. So I can't agree with posters that say
I mean sure... it would be great if there was a program to put the poor on an equal playing field with the well off, but my hats off to the first person that can come up with such a program while completely bypassing race in the process. Turn on the news, I think those Hurricane Katrina shots prove my point to the extreme. This country is too wrapped up in the notion that racial disparities don't exist anymore because this is 2005 and we've come a long way 🙄 Gimme a break... why do you think there's incentitives (scholarships, bonuses, etc) for physicians to serve in underserved areas? Obviously because the job of spreading health care around equally is not being carried out by today's generation of doctors. So what better doctors to usher in than those who came from such underserved and impoverished neighborhoods with a HIGH number of minorities. Think my points are invalid? I would love to see a poll strictly for caucasians that assessed who would be willing to work in underserved arears upon completion of residency. I can almost guarantee you that the number who said "Yes" would be lower than 10%. So who does that leave to care for the rest of the underprivillaged... yep you guessed it, MINORTITES. And how is the AAMC addressing this problem... damn, you guessed it again... AFFIRMATIVE ACTION... final point made... game, set and match 😎
WhatUpDoc! said:Race and socioeconomic status are so closely tied together in this country that it is impossible to address one without the other. So I can't agree with posters that say
I mean sure... it would be great if there was a program to put the poor on an equal playing field with the well off, but my hats off to the first person that can come up with such a program while completely bypassing race in the process. Turn on the news, I think those Hurricane Katrina shots prove my point to the extreme. This country is too wrapped up in the notion that racial disparities don't exist anymore because this is 2005 and we've come a long way 🙄 Gimme a break... why do you think there's incentitives (scholarships, bonuses, etc) for physicians to serve in underserved areas? Obviously because the job of spreading health care around equally is not being carried out by today's generation of doctors. So what better doctors to usher in than those who came from such underserved and impoverished neighborhoods with a HIGH number of minorities. Think my points are invalid? I would love to see a poll strictly for caucasians that assessed who would be willing to work in underserved arears upon completion of residency. I can almost guarantee you that the number who said "Yes" would be lower than 10%. So who does that leave to care for the rest of the underprivillaged... yep you guessed it, MINORTITES. And how is the AAMC addressing this problem... damn, you guessed it again... AFFIRMATIVE ACTION... final point made... game, set and match 😎
WhatUpDoc! said:Race and socioeconomic status are so closely tied together in this country that it is impossible to address one without the other. So I can't agree with posters that say
I mean sure... it would be great if there was a program to put the poor on an equal playing field with the well off, but my hats off to the first person that can come up with such a program while completely bypassing race in the process. Turn on the news, I think those Hurricane Katrina shots prove my point to the extreme. This country is too wrapped up in the notion that racial disparities don't exist anymore because this is 2005 and we've come a long way 🙄 Gimme a break... why do you think there's incentitives (scholarships, bonuses, etc) for physicians to serve in underserved areas? Obviously because the job of spreading health care around equally is not being carried out by today's generation of doctors. So what better doctors to usher in than those who came from such underserved and impoverished neighborhoods with a HIGH number of minorities. Think my points are invalid? I would love to see a poll strictly for caucasians that assessed who would be willing to work in underserved arears upon completion of residency. I can almost guarantee you that the number who said "Yes" would be lower than 10%. So who does that leave to care for the rest of the underprivillaged... yep you guessed it, MINORTITES. And how is the AAMC addressing this problem... damn, you guessed it again... AFFIRMATIVE ACTION... final point made... game, set and match 😎
MrBurns10 said:And, in my opinion, affirmative action by socioeconomic status would still benefit minorities because African-Americans, latinos, etc. still comprise a great percentage of the lesser advantaged population (unfortunately).
MrBurns10 said:Perhaps you should have read my last sentence:
Obviously socioeconomic status and race are tightly connected in this country...that was a lot of my point. By making affirmative action more about financial ability/opportunity rather than strictly because a person is a minority, you're helping the white folks who are severely disadvantaged while still primarily helping minorities since they "still comprise a great percentage of the lesser advantaged population." I'm not dumb, I know the issues that exist...and I still fail to see how I came across as saying that "racial disparities don't exist anymore" or at least supporting that mindset.
Next time you try to come across as the victor in an argument I didn't even know I was in, try reading the whole post first and not immediately jumping to conclusions so you can make some deep philosophical commentary on the state of race in American society that was part of my argument in the first place.
MrBurns10 said:By making affirmative action more about financial ability/opportunity rather than strictly because a person is a minority, you're helping the white folks who are severely disadvantaged while still primarily helping minorities since they "still comprise a great percentage of the lesser advantaged population.
MrBurns10 said:and I still fail to see how I came across as saying that "racial disparities don't exist anymore" or at least supporting that mindset.
MrBurns10 said:Next time you try to come across as the victor in an argument I didn't even know I was in, try reading the whole post first and not immediately jumping to conclusions so you can make some deep philosophical commentary on the state of race in American society that was part of my argument in the first place.
Los5272 said:AA helps alot of those races that are minorities by putting people who know the cultures and have personal connections to them so that more help can be available to them. There are many great doctors out there that are more than willing to help other cultures, but if you cannot communicate or relate with these people, the quality of care you give is not going to be at the level that it could be.
maxflash04 said:One thing I haven't been able to grasp is the idea of working for those that aren't as intellectual, educated, etc. as I am yet they're making more money, order me around, etc. Everyone's said it's part of life and in order to live my dream I'll have to do anything I can to afford it (college/medical related areas are so damn time consuming which only costs more money!). I guess that's something I'm going to have to deal with considering I'll be in school for at least four or five more years. :/
WhatUpDoc! said:Race and socioeconomic status are so closely tied together in this country that it is impossible to address one without the other. So I can't agree with posters that say
I mean sure... it would be great if there was a program to put the poor on an equal playing field with the well off, but my hats off to the first person that can come up with such a program while completely bypassing race in the process. Turn on the news, I think those Hurricane Katrina shots prove my point to the extreme. This country is too wrapped up in the notion that racial disparities don't exist anymore because this is 2005 and we've come a long way 🙄 Gimme a break... why do you think there's incentitives (scholarships, bonuses, etc) for physicians to serve in underserved areas? Obviously because the job of spreading health care around equally is not being carried out by today's generation of doctors. So what better doctors to usher in than those who came from such underserved and impoverished neighborhoods with a HIGH number of minorities. Think my points are invalid? I would love to see a poll strictly for caucasians that assessed who would be willing to work in underserved arears upon completion of residency. I can almost guarantee you that the number who said "Yes" would be lower than 10%. So who does that leave to care for the rest of the underprivillaged... yep you guessed it, MINORTITES. And how is the AAMC addressing this problem... damn, you guessed it again... AFFIRMATIVE ACTION... final point made... game, set and match 😎
WholeLottaGame7 said:WhatUpDoc makes the point that very few non-minorities would want to go work with underprivileged minorities in disadvantaged neighborhoods, but you could make the same point for places like Appalachia. Very few white people I know would want to go spend their time treating rednecks up in the mountains for a career.
Your analogy is garbage for so many reasons that I'm just gonna leave that one alone for right now. But I do give madd props for callin out those losers who blame their inability to get accepted on the fact that minorities are takin the spots away. 👍