I've also noticed that some of the postbacs that brag about high med school acceptance rates seem to be the ones that weed out in favor of people who are
already academic superstars, and/or EC superstars. I'm choosing to apply at Bennington, for example, because of the supportive environment and the arts atmosphere, and gambling that my arts background and overall premed kick-ass-ability will overcome my academic mediocrity.
Goucher, to use another example, seems as though they wouldn't be interested in me just by virtue of that 3.something GPA.
And I heartily agree with Lily that you should not give up just because the odds look stacked against you. However, I'm going to be a little provocative here.
I also believe that volunteer and/or job experience is vital to a solid application. Last year, while holding down the full-time job I've had for the past six years, I found the time to volunteer four hours a week at the local hospital. Then I found the time to get EMT certification as a night class. Then I found the time to get hired in a second job at that same hospital -- one that happens to have a competitive EM residency, by the way. I work the occasional sixteen-hour day, and that's a sacrifice I'm glad to make. I didn't feel comfortable applying until now, one year after starting as a volunteer, because it's now that I've satisfied
myself that I can hack the workload and the schedule. Convincing a committee just became that much easier, in my book.
I think postpacs are right to challenge anyone who says they know what it means to work in healthcare, without having some sort of first-hand perspective. Otherwise, how do we really know we're
not those people who just pick up on the idea of pursuing medicine?