I don't mind answering at all. At our school you are interviewed by a student and a faculty member. I am given a copy of your AMCAS application and there are no real guidelines for me aside from not offending the applicant. Our dean says "you are not a gatekeeper. Your job is to recruit as well as evaluate." My evaluation sheet includes categories such as motivation, confidence, maturity, higher level of thinking/reasoning, and of course, why do you want to be a physician and do you know what you are getting yourself into. I am also suppose to base my eval on whether or not I could see this person as someone who I would want to go to school with. Someone who I can carry an intelligent conversation with. Then I am suppose to rate you on a scale of whether you should definitely be accepted to definitely rejected.
After your interviews, a committee evaluates everything--the interview write ups and the AMCAS application and spits out either an acceptance or a rejection, or something inbetween. What are they looking for? I have no clue. I will say that the one kid who I flat out rejected was actually offered a seat in the next class, although no one who I have put "must accept" has been rejected.
What I meant about weak ECs, these students did not have a sense of what they were getting into. One student watched a pediatrician do paper work for a day and counted it as shadowing (at least she was honest). Another had worked in a hospital for years, but saw no patients in a medical capacity. Another had a reasonable amount on her application involving shadowing a doctor, but was not able to use it to show that she knew what she was going into or why she wanted to be a physican. What I like to see is someone who has experience with patients and can genuinely talk about it passionately and use it to explain why she wants to do what she is setting out to do. I honestly can't answer how much or how little is sufficient.
As far as non-medical ECs are concerned, I really don't care what they are. I think being the head of a pre-med club is lame, but anything along the lines of athletics, music, clubs on campus that actually do something, are all good and can spark conversation during the interview. On all my residency interview I was asked about things I like to do outside of school and it is just something to differentiate you from everyone else (at least in my opinion). If someone has to work fulltime and cannot participate in these things outside of school, I don't think that's a problem at all, providing they have the clinical work.
our school does not have a research focus and I have interviewed students with little or no research experience who have gotten accepted. I would say that grades, scores, and the clinical ECs are a priority, but the whole package seems to play a role.
Again, the final process is a black box to me. In addition I know for a fact that other schools have different processes.