- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Medical Student
Is it possible to do CP only? Are there any disadvantages to doing CP only?
I'm assuming you're saying AP is strictly for ppl sticking to academia and puts them at a disadvantage when seeking jobs or fellowships.
I see, so CP only is for ppl focussed on staying in academia/research.
What is the advantage of doing AP only? Or rather, what is the purpose of doing strictly 3 years of AP?
It sounds like AP/CP is the way to go. But does that mean those residency spots are more in demand?
I wonder for matching purposes, is an applicant's preference of AP/CP vs AP going to influence their match?
It sounds like AP/CP is the way to go. But does that mean those residency spots are more in demand?
I wonder for matching purposes, is an applicant's preference of AP/CP vs AP going to influence their match?
Most programs consider AP only and AP/CP candidates in the same pool. It's not like they want to take 3 AP only and 3 AP/CP. They want 6 candidates who are either AP or AP/CP. So there is no influence.
AP and CP are two completely unique fields with little overlap (except hemepath). I suggest you figure out which one you like or dislike, decide what type of career path you want to take, then go from there. I have met very few AP/CP residents who thoroughly enjoy their CP training (in fact I would say most dislike it). They only do it so that they can get CP boarded and get a private gig.
Thanks everyone for the input. While I have considered academia, I think I'd like to stay on a path that doesn't lock me in. I think AP/CP will be best fit for me. I'm sure a small number people have gone into academia doing AP/CP.
On the contrary, lots of people go into academia with AP/CP. While the old-timers are more likely to be AP-only or CP-only, it seems like many of the newer faculty have both.