APPIC Interview Invitation Thread (2021)

Started by psykhe
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Has anyone heard from Woodhull Medical Center or the Portland VA? I thought they were meant to be notifying today.
I have 12/15 down for Portland VA's notification date. Based on last years thread, they notified applicants 12/11 - fingers crossed we hear something tomorrow! 🤞
 
Does anyone know why the Louis Stokes (Cleveland) VA is on probation?
From late breaking email listserv:

APPIC Member #: 1508
Site Name: Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Location: Cleveland, OH
Training Director: James DeLamatre, Ph.D.; [email protected] - 216-791-38001, Ext 66818

Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center Psychology Internship has moved its application deadline from Mon Nov 2, 2020 to Mon Nov 16, 2020, and will announce invitations to interview by CoB Tue Dec 8th. Staffing changes and COVID related adjustments have created uncertainty for the Oncology/Hospice and Cares Tower Rehab Rotations and the Blind Rehabilitation enrichment for the 2021-2022 year. If we cannot offer those rotations we will still ensure our focus track in rehabilitation psychology by shifting experiences to other rehabilitation settings. Other rotation offerings remain essentially the same; please review our brochure. We will be selecting six interns for the 2021-2022 year.

Applicants have likely noted that last summer APA CoA placed our internship into “Accredited, on probation” status. CoA’s concerns that led to probation were: (1) The supervision information we submitted did not clearly reflect that we met all CoA requirements for the ‘additional’ 2 hours of supervision (of the 4 required hours all interns receive); (2) our competency evaluation tool did not clearly reflect some of the required elements for each competency area; (3) our presentation of outcomes data did not clearly illustrate all of the data required; and (4) information submitted did not clearly describe the methods Psychology Service uses to assess the effectiveness of ongoing efforts to recruit and retain diverse faculty/staff. Please review our brochure or inquire if you would like further information about corrections we have made to address CoA’s concerns. We cannot guarantee any outcome, but we will be reviewed again in the Spring 2021 Accreditation Meeting.

We take the feedback from CoA with the utmost seriousness and appreciation of the concerns that led to probation. There is of course a risk that our accreditation will be revoked and there is no denying that lack of an APA accredited internship closes some doors. In considering the risks of applying, please also note that we have been continuously accredited since 1979, have graduated over 400 interns, and have consistent feedback from alumni that their training here was excellent and their time enjoyable. Our graduates are employed in many industry sectors including the VA, private hospitals, community agencies, and academia. We remain dedicated to providing high quality training in psychology, and most importantly, we remain dedicated to the highest standards of professionalism and training ensured by the APA Standards of Accreditation.
 
Are you a part of the admissions committee somewhere? Do you have any thoughts about reaching out to a TD to inquire as to why you might not have been invited (especially if on paper you seemed like a quality candidate)? Not out of annoyance, but as a way to strengthen your application on the off chance you don't match next year?
Yes; Many of us on SDN are on selection and training committees. I completely agree with what @WisNeuro says below, and would add that asking for sincere feedback on your application a) demonstrates maturity b) shows continued interest should someone else back out or the match not result in all positions being filled c) is a fantastic growth opportunity.

I've given tough feedback (ie: you clearly didn't proofread or get feedback from interested advisors/ peers; your essays demonstrate superficial development/reflection in areas that are critical to success in our program) or feedback as simple as "not enough _____" where anything from reports, instruments, hours, supervision or professional development is plugged in. It's sometimes evident in applications that applicants want any _____ program (neuro, trauma, rehab, surg, peds, etc) and not OUR program, and we do give that feedback. We take fit very seriously; We hope our applicants do, too.

We get maybe a handful of such requests every year. Never hurts to ask in a tactful way. You may receive a variety of answers. I suspect many responses will be a generic "lack of fit" response. This could be due to a variety of reasons, such as the person being very busy, or it being a nice way of saying that the site doesn't take students from certain programs. Sometimes you will get a fairly detailed response about why you didn't receive an interview that can help you prepare for Phase II or next year if you do not happen to match the current cycle.

To the anxiety about programs pre-judging/ranking applicants before interviews.... just remember, you have your top choices/ranking pre-interview too!

And yes, those rankings do change based on our shared meetings. If you make it to an interview with us, and you appear to be as-represented on paper, you are now being ranked based on demonstrating agreement with core values of the program during your interview (minus giant red flags). My program doesn't pity-invite, or interview anyone we wouldn't considering hiring based on their accepted application.
 
I've given tough feedback (ie: you clearly didn't proofread or get feedback from interested advisors/ peers; your essays demonstrate superficial development/reflection in areas that are critical to success in our program) or feedback as simple as "not enough _____" where anything from reports, instruments, hours, supervision or professional development is plugged in. It's sometimes evident in applications that applicants want any _____ program (neuro, trauma, rehab, surg, peds, etc) and not OUR program, and we do give that feedback. We take fit very seriously; We hope our applicants do, too.
Awesome! I would love this kind of feedback.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Official Site Name: Columbia Valley Community Health
Date Invitation Received: 12/10/2020 at 3:55 PM EST
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): Mass email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): N/A
Interview Dates Offered: 1/8, 1/14, 1/18, 1/28
(In honor of years past) If & How you're staying sane: Reading through the new Stormlight Archive novel.
 
Rejection from Northwestern Feinberg. :/

Personalized email with very kind personalized letter! I appreciate that effort.
I am expecting this but haven't received it yet. I am fascinated by the idea of a personalized rejection letter (assuming you mean more than your name was inserted) so my curiosity is piqued!

@Action_Potential this is helpful and gives me some confidence to reach out to a couple of programs I really care about and would be interested in post-docing (sp?) at. Appreciate you taking the time to share!
 
I am expecting this but haven't received it yet. I am fascinated by the idea of a personalized rejection letter (assuming you mean more than your name was inserted) so my curiosity is piqued!

@Action_Potential this is helpful and gives me some confidence to reach out to a couple of programs I really care about and would be interested in post-docing (sp?) at. Appreciate you taking the time to share!
I was also rejected from this site and I wouldn’t say it was super personalized. I think it may have been an insert the name into the mass letter type thing. Mine basically said “we received a large number of applications for a small number of positions, so unfortunately we cannot interview many applicants who, Like you, have received good training and who would have done quite well here”
 
Me looking at my dwindling list of possible neuropsych program interviews:

1607655523557.png
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Personalized email with very kind personalized letter! I appr
I am expecting this but haven't received it yet. I am fascinated by the idea of a personalized rejection letter (assuming you mean more than your name was inserted) so my curiosity is piqued!

@Action_Potential this is helpful and gives me some confidence to reach out to a couple of programs I really care about and would be interested in post-docing (sp?) at. Appreciate you taking the time to share!
Yeah it was just personalized in that they listed my name and address in the letter and didn’t send in a mass email. But I still appreciate the time that takes, as none of my other rejections have done that.
 
Official Site Name: Hawaii Psychology Internship Consortium
- Youth Correctional Facility
- Department of Public Safety
Date Invitation Received: 12/10, 8:40 PM Eastern
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): Personal email
Interview Dates Offered: Date assigned (1/13)
(In honor of years past) If & How you're staying sane: Cultivating gratitude for the invites AND rejections. And snacks, lots of snacks
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
**DM Delivery**

Official Site Name: Alexian Brothers Behavioral Health Hospital
Date Invitation Received: 12/09/2020
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): Mass email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): Pediatric Neuropsychology
Interview Dates Offered: 01/08 & 01/22

Official Site Name: Hawaii Psychology Internship Consortium
Date Invitation Received: 12/10
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, Snapchat): Personal email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): Hawai’i Youth Correctional Facility- Oahu, East Hawai’I Family Guidance Center, Big Island
Interview Dates Offered: 1/20
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad