Applying to both PA and Medical School

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

CaptainPoopyPants

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2018
Messages
271
Reaction score
281
I'm planning on applying to both PA schools and Medical schools. However, I'm wondering if it's a bad idea to apply to both programs at the same school. Is it possible that the two programs would realize I've applied to both, and therefore question my commitment? Thank you.
 
Technically it's not a bad move but it is a bad move.

I will never understand why PA programs are biased towards med school rejects. IMO a med school reject will make a better PA than someone who worked in EMS and decided they wanted to become a PA.

Proceed with caution.
 
2) only 3-4% of applicants apply to both MD/DO and PA in same cycle
Where do you get information/data like this?
I will never understand why PA programs are biased towards med school rejects
The PA programs will never know if you don’t tell them. But likely it is because they know they were your backup choice.
 
Technically it's not a bad move but it is a bad move.

I will never understand why PA programs are biased towards med school rejects. IMO a med school reject will make a better PA than someone who worked in EMS and decided they wanted to become a PA.

Proceed with caution.

Nobody wants to be the backup no matter the reasoning
 
Nobody wants to be the backup no matter the reasoning
Not necessarily true. I have a Biotech company that I have an offer to be one of their departmental managers if I don’t get in this cycle. My Biotech advisor reached out to them and they made the offer. So, some places get what they get.
 
Not necessarily true. I have a Biotech company that I have an offer to be one of their departmental managers if I don’t get in this cycle. My Biotech advisor reached out to them and they made the offer. So, some places get what they get.

Well I mean it does depend on how desperate someone is. Professional school admissions generally get a lot more apps than they can a accept so they can sort of massage their ego a bit.
 
IMO a med school reject will make a better PA than someone who worked in EMS and decided they wanted to become a PA.
I completely disagree. Someone having field experience, especially emergent field experience around medical stabilization as well as being in a classroom setting will always set that individual apart from someone who is more sided towards the classroom setting and having done research in a laboratory or spent it volunteering with geriatric patients in a nursing home. The same reasoning also applies to someone who has to treat/administer patients who are stable versus patients who are anonymous, critical, & you have limited history on their background. I really respect people in EMS and having talked to them frequently, they have always taught me something that I didn't know about field medicine.
 
I completely disagree. Someone having field experience, especially emergent field experience around medical stabilization as well as being in a classroom setting will always set that individual apart from someone who is more sided towards the classroom setting and having done research in a laboratory or spent it volunteering with geriatric patients in a nursing home. The same reasoning also applies to someone who has to treat/administer patients who are stable versus patients who are anonymous, critical, & you have limited history on their background.

I'm going to be very frank with you. There are doctors today that call PA's third year medical students.

PA's have a requirement of tons of clinical hours which are not clinical shadowing hours. The field seems to attract former nurses and people with an EMS background and neither of those fields have anything to do with medicine. Nursing is nursing and EMS and honestly medical transport.

To be a doctor you need to excel in the classroom setting. That is a must.

Just because you're around a patient does not mean you are qualified to treat that patient.
 
I'm going to be very frank with you. There are doctors today that call PA's third year medical students.

PA's have a requirement of tons of clinical hours which are not clinical shadowing hours. The field seems to attract former nurses and people with an EMS background and neither of those fields have anything to do with medicine. Nursing is nursing and EMS and honestly medical transport.

To be a doctor you need to excel in the classroom setting. That is a must.

Just because you're around a patient does not mean you are qualified to treat that patient.
Before this devolves into a s***ting on PAs contest/thread: Let us acknowledge that PAs and NPs have their place within the realm of primary care in seeing/visiting with routine/non-emergency/non-novel case loads. PAs tend to recognize their place on the medical totem pole.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Responses with clear intent to inflame others are inappropriate for our community
Before this devolves into a s***ting on PAs contest/thread: Let us acknowledge that PAs and NPs have their place within the realm of primary care in seeing/visiting with routine/non-emergency/non-novel case loads. PAs tend to recognize their place on the medical totem pole as the majority of them are Non-trads who probably could have gotten in to medical school but 10 year delay in career is a no-go for most non-trads.

A physician once told me "the PA just does the H&P." That's coming from someone with an MD.

Most PA's are absolutely not non-trads. From what I have been over the past decade, they are younger females who make $100-120K and then go and marry MD's who are making 300-500K.

You cannot use PA and MD in the same sentence. They do two very different things.

On a plus side, if the PA takes all the MD's scut work, it makes the MD's life a lot easier so the relationship is mutually beneficial.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: M&L
On a plus side, if the PA takes all the MD's scut work, it makes the MD's life a lot easier so the relationship is mutually beneficial.
Get this idea out of your head before you get to MED school. By the time you finish residency, PAs and NPs will be in vastly more roles than we see them now. Do you really want to find yourself in a position where all of your nurses think that you believe their other providers are trash? Because I don’t think you want to be in that position.
 
I'm going to be very frank with you. There are doctors today that call PA's third year medical students.

PA's have a requirement of tons of clinical hours which are not clinical shadowing hours. The field seems to attract former nurses and people with an EMS background and neither of those fields have anything to do with medicine. Nursing is nursing and EMS and honestly medical transport.

To be a doctor you need to excel in the classroom setting. That is a must. Just because you're around a patient does not mean you are qualified to treat that patient.
Nursing and EMS are related to medicine, the onus is on you to prove otherwise if you're referring to the typical care that is provided by both fields when it comes to hospitalization. For the sake of humor, nurses in med/surg specialties are often responsible for physical assessment of patients following post-surgery whether it may be a crani, stent/pacemaker, PTX, etc. Failure to assess and also manage bulbs, lines, and drains can have significant complications when nurses aren't providing appropriate management within the ordered protocols outlined by the physician. This applies even more so to EMS that involve professionals responsible for medical stabilization of patients who often need surgery to address their current circumstances with paramedics being authorized to administer medications like nitroglycerine, naloxone, bolus fluids, and D5W/NS/insulin/glucagon in emergent medical situations.

When you're assigned to a patient to give them medical treatment and you have the corresponding license, then you are qualified to treat that patient. There are situations like the Good Samaritan principle which promote good stewardship outside of the hospital if you notice someone in a critical condition who needs help that you can provide within scope of practice. I think that writing off EMS as a non-medical field is ridiculous when a large number of patients are able to make it to the hospital for further stabilization thanks to medical stabilization by EMS.
 
Nursing and EMS are related to medicine, the onus is on you to prove otherwise if you're referring to the typical care that is provided by both fields when it comes to hospitalization. For the sake of humor, nurses in med/surg specialties are often responsible for physical assessment of patients following post-surgery whether it may be a crani, stent/pacemaker, PTX, etc. Failure to assess and also manage bulbs, lines, and drains can have significant complications when nurses aren't providing symptom management within the order protocols outlined by the physician. This applies even more so to EMS that involve professionals responsible for medical stabilization of patients who often need surgery to address their current circumstances with paramedics being authorized to administer medications like nitroglycerine, naloxone, bolus fluids, and D5W/NS/insulin/glucagon in emergent medical situations.

When you're assigned to a patient to give them medical treatment and you have the corresponding license, then you are qualified to treat that patient. There are situations like the Good Samaritan principle which promote good stewardship outside of the hospital if you notice someone in a critical condition who needs help that you can provide within scope of practice. I think that writing off EMS as a non-medical field is ridiculous when a large number of patients are able to make it to the hospital for further stabilization thanks to medical stabilization by EMS.

Like I said, I was being frank with you. You can however choose to see things the way you are choosing to see them but that may not be the reality of the situation.
 
Like I said, I was being frank with you. You can however choose to see things the way you are choosing to see them but that may not be the reality of the situation.
I understand, it's really hard to substantiate a charged statement by using actual examples or rational logic. I noticed that in the past three posts you have not highlighted what makes physicians irreplaceable which is their ability to have the acumen to diagnose patients based on the knowledge they gain from medical school & during residency. However, it is still within the scope of practice of EMS/nurses to treat patients as both fields either have explicit orders or standing orders for them to execute within their judgment as the physician cannot be omnipresent. And both aspects are still considered to be integral to medicine. Still curious though if you feel that "neither of those fields have anything to do with medicine" or whether you can just admit that you were making a statement to get SDN attention.
 
I understand, it's really hard to substantiate a charged statement by using actual examples or rational logic. I noticed that in the past three posts you have not highlighted what makes physicians irreplaceable which is their ability to have the acumen to diagnose patients based on the knowledge they gain from medical school & during residency. However, it is still within the scope of practice of EMS/nurses to treat patients as both fields either have explicit orders or standing orders for them to execute within their judgment as the physician cannot be omnipresent. And both aspects are still considered to be integral to medicine. Still curious though if you feel that "neither of those fields have anything to do with medicine" or whether you can just admit that you were making a statement to get SDN attention.

I'm going to be frank with you yet again...

Nurses are not doctors. EMS are not doctors either. Does that make more sense now?
 
I'm going to be frank with you yet again...

Nurses are not doctors. EMS are not doctors either. Does that make more sense now?
No one is saying that they are. But they are still critically important to the physician getting their job done and to talk down about them (when they are directly supporting the physician’s efforts) is absolutely idiotic.
 
No one is saying that they are. But they are still critically important to the physician getting their job done and to talk down about them (when they are directly supporting the physician’s efforts) is absolutely idiotic.

You need to stop coming up with your own narratives about other posts. Nobody is talking down about anybody. Stop trying to incite stuff. This is the second time I have noticed you trying to do that. If you disagree with a post, just move on to the next.
 
I'm going to be frank with you yet again... Nurses are not doctors. EMS are not doctors either. Does that make more sense now?
No, because there is a vast difference between typing that "neither of those fields have anything to do with medicine" and then needing to make a false equivalency statement of, "_____ are not doctors." In a prior post you attempted to divorce both fields from being r/t the general field of medicine by typing that "nursing is nursing" and EMS being "medical transport" instead of just typing something along the lines of... 'I meant that neither field is the same as being a medical doctor'.

I wasn't the one who tried to push the supposed word of mouth b.s. that you were spreading that physicians think their own PAs were the equivalent of third year medical students, when I've heard that the comparison is actually that PAs are like medical residents that never leave which has the exact opposite connotation. Also the notion that PAs role in any practice is to take on just the "scut work" makes me actually believe that you think a PA would have the same scope of practice as a medical assistant/lab phlebotomist when in specialties like trauma/ortho they are often the first person to see the patient in the ED to perform the H&P and hence often have autonomy to decide whether they are going to be primary on that patient.

There's literally no point in responding to this. Go ahead, quote it. If you have issues with admitting that you made an incorrect statement, then this is literally a waste of time because you can literally typing any sort of B.S. that got lost in translation to you in a game of telephone and then you will waste hours recanting how it isn't your fault. Waste of time.
 
You need to stop coming up with your own narratives about other posts. Nobody is talking down about anybody. Stop trying to incite stuff. This is the second time I have noticed you trying to do that. If you disagree with a post, just move on to the next.
You are being confrontational by speaking negatively of entire professions and fields of care. I am not inviting anything, merely pointing out your animosity to entire groups of people.
worked in EMS and decided they wanted to become a PA.
This is inciting that the only person good enough for medicine is someone in the premed track. Congratulations on your organic chemistry class, now can you deal with patients? It is silly and makes no sense.
Just because you're around a patient does not mean you are qualified to treat that patient.
This is directly stating that somehow nurses and EMS are not qualified to do their job and they aren’t doing anything even? Insinuating worthlessness in nurses and EMS...
There are doctors today that call PA's third year medical students.
You are conveying that you agree with these doctors. Again, this insinuates that you are putting down an entire field of health care professionals. No one is saying they are doctors, but you are outright denying they even do anything.
You cannot use PA and MD in the same sentence. They do two very different things.
They are two very different things and no one is saying they are the same. However, you are being confrontational with it and, in the context of all of your other posts in the thread, this suggests you see no value in PAs.
if the PA takes all the MD's scut work,
This suggests the only thing productive you see PAs being good for is what an MD is too good for? Congratulations on the god complex...
Nurses are not doctors. EMS are not doctors either. Does that make more sense now?
Again, no one is saying they are. But in context of your activity in this thread, you are implying that they do nothing, which is just simply not true.


Why be confrontational and put down other fields of care? You can speak of the importance of MDs without downplaying the role of nurses and PAs
 
No, because there is a vast difference between typing that "neither of those fields have anything to do with medicine" and then needing to make a false equivalency statement of, "_____ are not doctors." In a prior post you attempted to divorce both fields from being r/t the general field of medicine by typing that "nursing is nursing" and EMS being "medical transport" instead of just typing something along the lines of... 'I meant that neither field is the same as being a medical doctor'.

I wasn't the one who tried to push the supposed word of mouth b.s. that you were spreading that physicians think their own PAs were the equivalent of third year medical students, when I've heard that the comparison is actually that PAs are like medical residents that never leave which has the exact opposite connotation. Also the notion that PAs role in any office to take on just the scut work makes me actually believe that you think a PA would have the same scope of practice as a medical assistant/lab phlebotomist when in specialties like trauma/ortho they are often the first person to see the patient in the ED to perform the H&P and hence often have autonomy to decide whether they are going to be primary on that patient.

Well, all I can tell you my friend is that you are going to be in for a rude wake up call when you get out there in the real world and see how this medical thing is really done.
 
You are being confrontational by speaking negatively of entire professions and fields of care. I am not inviting anything, merely pointing out your animosity to entire groups of people.

This is inciting that the only person good enough for medicine is someone in the premed track. Congratulations on your organic chemistry class, now can you deal with patients? It is silly and makes no sense.
This is directly stating that somehow nurses and EMS are not qualified to do their job and they aren’t doing anything even? Insinuating worthlessness in nurses and EMS...
You are conveying that you agree with these doctors. Again, this insinuates that you are putting down an entire field of health care professionals. No one is saying they are doctors, but you are outright denying they even do anything.
They are two very different things and no one is saying they are the same. However, you are being confrontational with it and, in the context of all of your other posts in the thread, this suggests you see no value in PAs.
This suggests the only thing productive you see PAs being good for is what an MD is too good for? Congratulations on the god complex...

Again, no one is saying they are. But in context of your activity in this thread, you are implying that they do nothing, which is just simply not true.


Why be confrontational and put down other fields of care? You can speak of the importance of MDs without downplaying the role of nurses and PAs

Settle down man
 
Well, all I can tell you my friend is that you are going to be in for a rude wake up call when you get out there in the real world and see how this medical thing is really done.
Lol At us not having real world experience? You will be in for the same rude awakening when you tell PA Jeff that he is worthless and the Nurse rumor mill makes it up to higher and you find yourself unable to be a physician in your state.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Settle down man
You tell someone they are inciting something when you are the ‘inciter.’ They call you out. You tell them to calm down. How quaint.

I just don’t find it appropriate for my fellow premed peers to think nothing of the rest of the healthcare team. It is a TEAM. The physician may be in charge, but the physician is worthless without their supporting staff.
 
I'm going to be very frank with you. There are doctors today that call PA's third year medical students.

PA's have a requirement of tons of clinical hours which are not clinical shadowing hours. The field seems to attract former nurses and people with an EMS background and neither of those fields have anything to do with medicine. Nursing is nursing and EMS and honestly medical transport.

To be a doctor you need to excel in the classroom setting. That is a must.

Just because you're around a patient does not mean you are qualified to treat that patient.

Ummm PAs do have academic coursework that is challenging. Their entrance requirements are almost similar to pre-med reqs.
 
I will see that nurses are doctors?
No, you will see that you cannot get your job done without them. And, more often than not, you will be kissing their ass as opposed to the other way around.
 
No, you will see that you cannot get your job done without them. And, more often than not, you will be kissing their ass as opposed to the other way around.

I think you need to re-read the whole thread. Someone was comparing PA's to MD's

What you're trying to do is come up with a fake argument that someone is arguing that we don't need nurses. Don't do that. It makes you look bad and not credible.
 
“This entire career field didn’t have to take my (mostly inaccurate and not good at predicting clinical acumen) standardized test. Even though they went through all of the same undergrad classes I did and had to maintain the same GPA I did, lacking that standardized test means they didn’t have to work as hard as I did.”
Umm yeah right. You haven't even started medical school yet. You don't know what you don't know.
 
I think you need to re-read the whole thread. Someone was comparing PA's to MD's

What you're trying to do is come up with a fake argument that someone is arguing that we don't need nurses. Don't do that. It makes you look bad and not credible.

You’re missing the point. We all know that PAs and MDs are different and no one is trying to argue they aren’t. The point is you’re acting arrogant and like MDs are gods and PAs are pathetic. Some careers are better fits for others, but you don’t have to act like you’re so much better than everybody else, especially when you’re not even an MD yet. It’s not cute.
 
You're arguing that PA prerequisite work is almost equal to MD prerequisite work though.

They actually usually have MORE pre-requisite courses, probably due to the shorter pre-clinical time they have. When I was considering PA vs physician, PA programs required anatomy and physiology, microbiology, medical terminology, etc that MD/DO schools did not.
 
They actually usually have MORE pre-requisite courses, probably due to the shorter pre-clinical time they have. When I was considering PA vs physician, PA programs required anatomy and physiology, microbiology, medical terminology, etc that MD/DO schools did not.

PA schools don't require orgo II or physics though and those are much harder weeder courses.
 
You’re missing the point. We all know that PAs and MDs are different and no one is trying to argue they aren’t. The point is you’re acting arrogant and like MDs are gods and PAs are pathetic. Some careers are better fits for others, but you don’t have to act like you’re so much better than everybody else, especially when you’re not even an MD yet. It’s not cute.

Just stop. Nobody said that.
 
Just stop. Nobody said that.
“If anything the PA can do the MDs scut work.” “PA and MD can’t even be used in the same sentence.”

You are doing exactly that and you don’t seem to realize how what you are saying displaying contempt for PAs and other fields of care. It is not what you are saying, it is how you are saying it.
 
“If anything the PA can do the MDs scut work.” “PA and MD can’t even be used in the same sentence.”

You are doing exactly that and you don’t seem to realize how what you are saying displaying contempt for PAs and other fields of care. It is not what you are saying, it is how you are saying it.

Settle down man. Stop getting worked up for nothing.

Nobody is displaying contempt for anybody.
 
Nursing is nursing and EMS and honestly medical transport.

While most of the time EMS just brings the patient to the hospital, there are absolutely a handful of situations where they make a big impact on patient care based on their own clinical assessment and following treatment algorithms (which are highly protocolized for good reason, because as you point out they are not doctors).

Ventilation + narcan for an opioid OD.
Field activation of cath lab -> bypassing the ED with a STEMI patient saves a lot of time and impacts outcomes.
Giving dextrose or glucagon to someone in a hypoglycemic crisis.
Putting a CHF patient on CPAP at the bedside can help avoid intubation -> prevent them from landing in the ICU and dying from pneumonia.
Benzos for status epilepticus.
Chest decompression for tension pneumothorax / traumatic arrest.
Providing ACLS for non-traumatic cardiac arrest.
 
Settle down man. Stop getting worked up for nothing.

Nobody is displaying contempt for anybody.
I am not even worked up. I am literally just pointing out to you how you are coming across and you are getting defensive.

You cannot say that'Nobody is displaying contempt for anybody" when you literally have multiple people telling you that this is how you are coming across - ergo, you are displaying contempt even if that is not your intent.
 
While most of the time EMS just brings the patient to the hospital, there are absolutely a handful of situations where they make a big impact on patient care based on their own clinical assessment and following treatment algorithms (which are highly protocolized for good reason, because as you point out they are not doctors).

Ventilation + narcan for an opioid OD.
Field activation of cath lab -> bypassing the ED with a STEMI patient saves a lot of time and impacts outcomes.
Giving dextrose or glucagon to someone in a hypoglycemic crisis.
Putting a CHF patient on CPAP at the bedside can help avoid intubation -> prevent them from landing in the ICU and dying from pneumonia.
Benzos for status epilepticus.
Chest decompression for tension pneumothorax / traumatic arrest.
Providing ACLS for non-traumatic cardiac arrest.

A handful is only a handful though.
 
I am not even worked up. I am literally just pointing out to you how you are coming across and you are getting defensive.

You cannot say that'Nobody is displaying contempt for anybody" when you literally have multiple people telling you that this is how you are coming across - ergo, you are displaying contempt even if that is not your intent.

Just take it easy man. If this isn't your cup of tea, move on to the next thread. I stand by what I said.
 
Top