D
deleted407021
That is sad. Well, choices were made and Darwin awards were presented.Sadly 9/10 times this occurred pretty early in the school year.
That is sad. Well, choices were made and Darwin awards were presented.Sadly 9/10 times this occurred pretty early in the school year.
It doesn't matter what you call it, there is AA in med school admissions. How else would URMs be getting in with significantly lower stats on average?
There are ORMs that get in with significantly lower stats. How do you explain that?
If only their arguments were as well articulated and informed as their fingers were eager to post.Apologies for unintended profanity in advance.
![]()
![]()
The above two memes explain this sudden 1K explosion of such threads. A shame.
so again....we need to work on some reading comprehension....THERE IS NO AA AND HASN'T BEEN FOR 20 YEARS.
There is no AA in med school admissions as well. So stop complaining, comparing yourself to people and making yourself a martyr.
Geez.....if you don't focus on what you need to do to gain admissions and stop making excuses for everything you're going to be your own worst enemy.
If only their arguments were as well articulated and informed as their fingers are eager to post.
Wat? Where did you come from, anyway?Bad argument there. URMs have lower average scores while there exist ORMs with low scores. Completely different scenarios and implications. So because there are short men, there must be no difference in average height between genders right?
Wat? Where did you come from, anyway?
I see what you mean.Saying average scores for a whole group is lower vs. saying there are people with low scores from a group are two different things which BamaNicole tried equating
YOU ARE WRONG: https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/newsreleases/377850/04232014.html
The AAMC has also submitted amicus briefs to SCOTUS supporting affirmative action. No need to lie.
Saying average scores for a whole group is lower vs. saying there are people with low scores from a group are two different things which BamaNicole tried equating
I never said Affirmative Action = Quotas. They aren't the same thing.So where do you see that there are quotas.
Actually the whole agrument was "those with low test scores shouldn't get in because they won't be good doctors" then someone talked about how URMs "get in with lower scores" well so do URMs.
For the record I'm planning on staying in the Midwest and want to work within the LGBTQ community. So yeah
How? There are three times the number of Asian matriculants than Black matriculants (with Affirmative Action). Even Whites are significantly underrepresented in medicine in comparison to Asians. How is this group being discriminated against in medical admissions?
There are ORMs that get in with significantly lower stats. How do you explain that?
This is not a hard concept to grasp.
5% of people who run at 100-meter olympic trials make it. 2% of people who walked make it in the same event.
Just because people who are performing empirically at higher levels are getting accepted at higher rates, it doesn't mean they're being given an advantage. The fair thing to do would be to accept 7% people who ran, and 0% of the people who walked. There is a huge lack of understanding of how affirmative action creates advantages/disadvantages relative to objective measures of competitiveness if you think Asians being accepted at 3 times the rates of African Americans means they're not being discriminated against. URM scores are on average lower than whites and Asians, meaning that they have easier standards when it comes to being accepted into medical schools (and undergrad). It's very simple
There's a big flaw in your analogy (rendering it completely useless) and that's that it makes the assumption medical school admissions is a one dimensional race, with one single goal- to recruit the highest scoring applicants in MCAT/GPA combo. It is not, and many, many things are taken into account (including bedside manners, ability to connect with the patient (aka socially competent), resembling patient population figures, areas of interest etc.) If that were the case, we would see 100% of applicants accepted in the upper right corner of the mcat/gpa grid and see all seats filled on downward.
A funny thing is that most of the people who complain about ADCOMs taking ethnicity to consideration are mostly on the lower scoring of the chart. If
ADCOMS were to make medical school admissions based soley on GPA/MCAT, these individuals would automatically find themselves without an acceptance to a any medical school as higher scoring individuals would fill the seats over and over again. The fact that ADCOMS considers multiple factors in addition to GPA/MCAT scores is what gets in a BIG chunk acceptees.
And just as a side note, I find it a bit odd that the same day the troll thread starter gets banned, a new profile pops up with a very ambitious posting in the same thread. 🙄
I agree. But just to add to what you said about the complainers- in my experience they also include ppl with really good stats that only want an acceptance to a "top tier school." They're afraid that someone will take their "top 15" seat and that is Armageddon to them. And as you pointed out, this is without taking other factors into consideration.
Why that community?
The same is true in undergrad. I remember a lot of my white and asian friends complaining about how easy minorities had it in undergrad admissions.
All my minority friends are going to community college, working part time to save momey, and planning on transferring except for one going to a top 5 and most of the complainers are at top 20s. Go figure.
I also made it out pretty well but I can't tell people I have a scholarship because they will grill me about me getting it only because of my last name (has happened a lot). People even going as far as pointing to my honors and distinctions as being handed out because of AA in spite of being one of maybe 10 URMs in one distinction and one of two in the other distinction.
There's a big flaw in your analogy (rendering it completely useless) and that's that it makes the assumption medical school admissions is a one dimensional race, with one single goal- to recruit the highest scoring applicants in MCAT/GPA combo. It is not, and many, many things are taken into account (including bedside manners, ability to connect with the patient (aka socially competent), resembling patient population figures, areas of interest etc.) If that were the case, we would see 100% of applicants accepted in the upper right corner of the mcat/gpa grid and see all seats filled on downward.
A funny thing is that most of the people who complain about ADCOMs taking ethnicity to consideration are mostly on the lower scoring of the chart. If ADCOMS were to make medical school admissions based soley on GPA/MCAT, these individuals would automatically find themselves without an acceptance to a any medical school as higher scoring individuals would fill the seats over and over again. The fact that ADCOMS considers multiple factors in addition to GPA/MCAT scores is what gets in a BIG chunk acceptees.
And just as a side note, I find it a bit odd that the same day the troll thread starter gets banned, a new profile pops up with a very ambitious posting in the same thread. 🙄
"The whole argument" meaning MDforMee? No one else on this thread that is being taken seriously has said "those with
I thought we were having a reasonable debate about an important topic that significantly impacts both current and future medical students. This really wasn't nearly as terrible as most threads on the topic are. Disagreeing =/= not getting alongSeconded. I don't see people getting along here anytime soon... Abandoning ship.
Don't forget the good times... Don't ever let go, jack
YOU ARE WRONG: https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/newsreleases/377850/04232014.html
The AAMC has also submitted amicus briefs to SCOTUS supporting affirmative action. No need to lie.
I never said Affirmative Action = Quotas. They aren't the same thing.
I thought we were having a reasonable debate about an important topic that significantly impacts both current and future medical students. This really wasn't nearly as terrible as most threads on the topic are. Disagreeing =/= not getting along
We lost faith when you use that experience to somehow give yourself gravitas in the affirmative action debate.I lost faith when my intentions for helping underprivileged students were attacked.
Because I was once a really scared queer teen who didn't have a lot of adults on her life she could trust. I saw my friends suffer. Some of them became homeless after they came out to their parents. Most of them were depressed. I want to help teens like that have proper, non discriminatory mental health care.
lol yes. Though I must admit I lost faith we he dropped this gem:We lost faith when you use that experience to somehow give yourself gravitas in the affirmative action debate.
I can only speak for myself, here, but admitting people to medical school with inferior abilities will inevitably interfere with my future patient's abilities to recover from their medical problems.
Ouch, he's gonna need some ice after that burn...We lost faith when you use that experience to somehow give yourself gravitas in the affirmative action debate.
We lost faith when you use that experience to somehow give yourself gravitas in the affirmative action debate.
Oh, yes please take us to the promise land of clinical competence!! Since you've told us that undergraduate GPA and MCAT score predict this. Tell me, if I get a 45 on the MCAT will I be able to regenerate organs for my patient since, "future patient's abilities to recover from their medical problems" depends on it?You're just proving my point.
Do yourself a favor and look into why blacks and hispanics fail out of medical school, by the way. Their most commonly cited reasons are academic; this is not the case with white and asian students.
If you think that other URMs who similarly struggle academically in medical school are somehow wisked away from experiencing related problems, clinically, you're in for a rude awakening. You should be thanking me for helping students learn how to succeed, academically.
See ya, gimps
Was there a recent study done on this or are you citing a study from about 20 years ago?Do yourself a favor and look into why blacks and hispanics fail out of medical school, by the way. Their most commonly cited reasons are academic; this is not the case with white and asian students.
If you think that other URMs who similarly struggle academically in medical school are somehow wisked away from experiencing related problems, clinically, you're in for a rude awakening. You should be thanking me for helping students learn how to succeed, academically.
See ya, gimps
I've made the point earlier; he's been stuck on this theme of predicting the efficacy of any physician based on their undergraduate credentials.lol yes. Though I must admit I lost faith we he dropped this gem:
You lost your credibility with, ....well, most people, when, a while back, you kept going on about how non hard science majors shouldn't go to medical school.
And yes, it is relevant to the discussion because you started it. See quote above.
Do us a favor, please show us a shred of evidence that supports this beyond your bizarre imagination. You tell people to read the evidence like it exists, so please share what you are referring to. I'm begging you... Because every other credible source completely contradicts everything you are saying. The attrition rates for allopathic medical schools are really low, including for URMs, and those who do leave the most common reason is finances.You're just proving my point.
Do yourself a favor and look into why blacks and hispanics fail out of medical school, by the way. Their most commonly cited reasons are academic; this is not the case with white and asian students.
If you think that other URMs who similarly struggle academically in medical school are somehow wisked away from experiencing related problems, clinically, you're in for a rude awakening. You should be thanking me for helping students learn how to succeed, academically.
See ya, gimps
You lost your credibility with, ....well, most people, when, a while back, you kept going on about how non hard science majors shouldn't go to medical school.
And yes, it is relevant to the discussion because you started it. See quote above.
Oh, yes please take us to the promise land of clinical competence!! Since you've told us that undergraduate GPA and MCAT score predict this. Tell me, if I get a 45 on the MCAT will I be able to regenerate organs for my patient since, "future patient's abilities to recover from their medical problems" depends on it?
You're just proving my point.
Do yourself a favor and look into why blacks and hispanics fail out of medical school, by the way. Their most commonly cited reasons are academic; this is not the case with white and asian students.
If you think that other URMs who similarly struggle academically in medical school are somehow wisked away from experiencing related problems, clinically, you're in for a rude awakening. You should be thanking me for helping students learn how to succeed, academically.
See ya, gimps
I'm not certain. I've tried to find it, but it's buried under maybe 4+ months of posts by him. He kept going on about how people who didn't major in physics, chemistry or biology aren't equipped for a medical career and shouldn't be admitted to medical school. It was absurd.Wait wut????
Where did he say that??
One of the most incompetent physicians I ever had the displeasure of working with was an MD/PhD from a top 5 school.I've received incompetent "medical care" (which was more like "illness exacerbation") from "ORM" physicians that attended prestigious institutions for medical school and residency. I'm sure they had fantastic MCAT's USMLE's etc but they were horrible as clinicians. These experiences have been a driving force in my desire to become a doctor.
Maybe it was in the PAs getting into medical school without the MCAT thread? It sounds familiar.I'm not certain. I've tried to find it, but it's buried under maybe 4+ months of posts by him. He kept going on about how people who didn't major in physics, chemistry or biology aren't equipped for a medical career and shouldn't be admitted to medical school. It was absurd.
I'm not certain. I've tried to find it, but it's buried under maybe 4+ months of posts by him. He kept going on about how people who didn't major in physics, chemistry or biology aren't equipped for a medical career and shouldn't be admitted to medical school. It was absurd.
Found it.Wait wut????
Where did he say that??
I get what you are trying to do but please try to look at it from another perspective.
There is a huge distrust between minority communities with white physicians and if we look at the horrible and unethical events in our history, their distrust may be justifiable. I’m sure you are familiar with the Tuskegee syphilis experiment or the Guatemala syphilis experiment. In fact, throughout our history minorities have been repeatedly used as guinea pigs by white physicians and researchers. In practically all those dishonorable experiments the minorities usually ended up dead though they were mislead into believing they were receiving quality health care. As a result, many minority populations do not trust most white physicians.
You're just proving my point.
Do yourself a favor and look into why blacks and hispanics fail out of medical school, by the way. Their most commonly cited reasons are academic; this is not the case with white and asian students.
If you think that other URMs who similarly struggle academically in medical school are somehow wisked away from experiencing related problems, clinically, you're in for a rude awakening. You should be thanking me for helping students learn how to succeed, academically.
See ya, gimps
Sometimes they do. Sometimes they don't. This has been a particularly amiable thread, considering the subject matter.Shouldn't this thread be locked because the OP is banned?
Shouldn't this thread be locked because the OP is banned?
Many threads live on long after their OP is banned. Look no further than the Class of 2018 thread that has been going for nearly a decade. It just depends on whether anything constructive is happening in the thread post-ban.Shouldn't this thread be locked because the OP is banned?