- Joined
- Mar 5, 2011
- Messages
- 823
- Reaction score
- 29
Granted, I think many things we learn in OPP are quite useful to some extent, and I quite enjoy lumbar, thoracic, and cervical diagnosis and treatment, but other things in OPP are frankly a little bit out there. Has anyone ever felt Chapman's points? They seem to be completely made up, and why is this even being taught if there is no evidence supporting its existence? Don't you think things like this will only undermine our credibility as osteopathic physicians?