Perhaps you should take a critical reading class, because you obviously have absolutely no comprehension about what I'm talking about.
What does anything you just said have to do with any of the points I brought up?
I'm not arguing about physician satisfaction being tied to money. These are two are different issues and are not being discussed in this thread.
You can be the happiest, kindest, most satisfied physician in the world, and I assure you, if you start making less money, you won't like it. Does that mean you are dissatisfied with the job and the tasks it demands in itself? No, you're dissatisfied with the pay, which is a different issue.
The converse is also true...you can be the highest paid physician in the world, and if you hate treating patients, you'll hate the job no matter what.
No where in what I'm saying am I even mentioning job satisfaction...that is a completely different issue that has nothing to do with pay, in my opinion. I am trying to point out the fallacy that because one is satisfied with their job, then they have some obligation to accept less pay; ie because I love medicine, I'd do it for less.
Somehow, in your strange little world, if a doctor complains about his pay, he is ungrateful, selfish, or hates his job. I am simply trying to say there is nothing wrong with being concerned, heck even demanding, terms of income when negotiating in future employment opportunities.