- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Pre-Health (Field Undecided)
I keep hearing how some classes are like that..then how is it possible to keep a 2.5/3.0 average?
How is the grading scale in pharmacy school?
What grade is an A+, A, A-, B+, etc..
Have you not had any classes like that in undergrad? My first p-chem test had an average in the upper 50s and that was higher than the professor expected. That class wasn't curved. My dad tells stories of his EE classes at Georgia Tech where a 40 was a B. It's a necessary reality check to some kids, IMO.
I keep hearing how some classes are like that..then how is it possible to keep a 2.5/3.0 average?
How is the grading scale in pharmacy school?
What grade is an A+, A, A-, B+, etc..
Have you not had any classes like that in undergrad? My first p-chem test had an average in the upper 50s and that was higher than the professor expected. That class wasn't curved. My dad tells stories of his EE classes at Georgia Tech where a 40 was a B. It's a necessary reality check to some kids, IMO.
In pharm school, all the classes are pass/no pass but you have to get a 90% to pass. That forces everyone to study harder but I'm pretty sure our exams aren't as hard as they could be because they don't want half the class flunking out.
Only a few schools are like this (all P/F), most are traditionally graded.
Sorry, I meant in my pharm school as opposed to my undergrad education. I didn't mean to imply that all the schools work the same way.
I think curving exams/classes is silly. In real life, things are not curved. If you mess up and someone gets hurt, that error is on you.
Granted curving is silly, but so are exams that are designed for the student to fail.
Curious though, how does that work for a) Rho Chi, b) residency GPA requirements, and c) other random things that generally expect a GPA/class rank or percentile?
Is everyone assumed to be an an A/90%+ student? Just wondering how you guys work around it. Or is it more like pass w/ high honors, pass, and no-pass?
I think curving exams/classes is silly. In real life, things are not curved. If you mess up and someone gets hurt, that error is on you.
Granted curving is silly, but so are exams that are designed for the student to fail.
I think curving exams/classes is silly. In real life, things are not curved. If you mess up and someone gets hurt, that error is on you.
Granted curving is silly, but so are exams that are designed for the student to fail.
In real life you look things up and don't rely solely on memory. Standard testing is an artificial measure of clinical ability.
I think it would be much better if they did away with testing, and instead grading was based on research projects, presentations, papers, etc.
that would be terrible for people with adhd or organizationally challenged. maybe if this was a school that was clinical faculty training ground... but in retail, (60+% of pharmacists) , you perform the job by being a cashier with application of memorized facts to make decisions about stuff, not preparing posters, writing papers, and researching