gassedout2015
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2016
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 11
My university hospital is starting to open up elective surgeries, imaging, and other services as of 5/15.
Last edited:
My university hospital is starting to open up elective surgeries, imaging, and other services as of 5/15.
You guys notice pain procedure volume picking up again?
Bans were needed. Elective surgeries should be open everywhere now, but we still need to triage![]()
Free Market Friday: Surgery bans damage lives and livelihoods | The Journal Record
One sobering aspect of governments’ responses to COVID-19 has been the insistence by some that governments are saving lives no matter how many people die or are harmed as a result of those government actions.journalrecord.com
Bans were needed. Elective surgeries should be open everywhere now, but we still need to triage
With the data they had at that time and seeing how Italy’s (and New York’s to a lesser extent) healthcare system was overrun, what did you expect them to do? They assumed that all resources and staff would be needed for the incoming deluge of COVID patients that never materialized. Hindsight is always 20/20.Except for in a few hot-spots please explain why elective surgeries needed to be banned? History will remember that banning elective procedures everywhere was misguided.
Moreover, imagine if we didn't. What would have happened?
In hindsight, we could have done things more efficiently, like isolating only the very vulnerable. But we were looking at places like Italy, which was quarantining entire regions in panic. I think it was a reasonable but I guess we'll see how things go from here. History will judge.Except for in a few hot-spots please explain why elective surgeries needed to be banned? History will remember that banning elective procedures everywhere was misguided.
Moreover, imagine if we didn't. What would have happened?
Except for in a few hot-spots please explain why elective surgeries needed to be banned? History will remember that banning elective procedures everywhere was misguided.
Moreover, imagine if we didn't. What would have happened?
the preliminary White House data stated that there was going to be 1 million deaths - one of of every 300 Americans were going to die. corroborated specifically from the mouth of one Peter Navarro. 80+ million Americans infected. worst case scenario by CDC and White House models were 214 million Americans infected and 2.2 million deaths.
initial estimates was that over 30,000 ventilators were needed in NYC alone.
if we hadn't instituted social distancing and stay at home orders, our current good but still horrible would have been much worse, and the spread even greater than it has been.
the preliminary White House data stated that there was going to be 1 million deaths - one of of every 300 Americans were going to die. corroborated specifically from the mouth of one Peter Navarro. 80+ million Americans infected. worst case scenario by CDC and White House models were 214 million Americans infected and 2.2 million deaths.
initial estimates was that over 30,000 ventilators were needed in NYC alone.
if we hadn't instituted social distancing and stay at home orders, our current good but still horrible would have been much worse, and the spread even greater than it has been.
the preliminary White House data stated that there was going to be 1 million deaths - one of of every 300 Americans were going to die. corroborated specifically from the mouth of one Peter Navarro. 80+ million Americans infected. worst case scenario by CDC and White House models were 214 million Americans infected and 2.2 million deaths.
initial estimates was that over 30,000 ventilators were needed in NYC alone.
if we hadn't instituted social distancing and stay at home orders, our current good but still horrible would have been much worse, and the spread even greater than it has been.
So your saying despite Trump running the country, the lives were saved despite Trump?nope.
I'm saying we saved 900,000-2,100,000 lives because of what we all did, through state guidance.
the states ordered the stay at home orders, not trump.
Doesn't stop Trump from touting that we could of had 2.2 million deaths, IF not for HIS very Clear and concise messaging and leadership on this silent invisible killerbased on Ferguson, who apparently hasnt been right about much
Doesn't stop Trump from touting that we could of had 2.2 million deaths, IF not for HIS very Clear and concise messaging and leadership on this silent invisible killer
I'm saying that the actions of the various state governors and state governments acting flattened the curve.So your saying despite Trump running the country, the lives were saved despite Trump?
Yes but if the governor is republican and good things are happening, then it's because of the democrat mayor. You just go down the chain to the highest democrat to give credit. For every negative thing, you just blame Trump.basically if there was any benefit from the gov't's actions it was due to the actions of individual states and governors. If there was harm, it was obviously due to Trump's incompetence. If you can't see that then you are a narrow minded, intolerant bigot (likely a privileged white male) who is putting millions of lives at risk because of your own selfish desire to act as you wish
Please show me what source(facebook?) this is from...much of this with no context a quick google search shows this:It’s an election year. Meme wars with bad spelling.
View attachment 306685
did I quote the political parties of the various governors?Yes but if the governor is republican and good things are happening, then it's because of the democrat mayor. You just go down the chain to the highest democrat to give credit. For every negative thing, you just blame Trump.
Great... so you did get off facebookYou want to nitpick at the budget numbers? Relax....it’s a meme. They can’t even spell mortality correctly. But there are some facts in it.....like we all know New York has the most cases.
Again typical response by doctodd. Once confronted with any facts your response is always "relax" or divert.You want to nitpick at the budget numbers? Relax....it’s a meme. They can’t even spell mortality correctly. But there are some facts in it.....like we all know New York has the most cases.
Same. Referrals way down, but had a backlog of ~175 when electives reopened so that will keep me busy for a while.Jack arses, please keep your BS political views that no one cares about in a special little thread that you can curate 24 hours a day while everyone else answers the OPs question.
I am back to nearly capacity, but referrals are still way down.
----Back in January, everything looked on track for California financially. The state was even looking at a $6 billion surplus and had accumulated a healthy "rainy day fund" of $18 billion.
That's all changed since the coronavirus swept around the world and decimated the economy. The state of California is now looking at a projected $54 billion deficit.
You might want to check Florida and Texas for same thingAny “surplus” was a mirage—their pension funds for workers and teachers are woefully underfunded to the tune of $200b.
You might want to check Florida and Texas for same thing
I think the CDC testing flaws, and vent shortage and other things you mentioned were alarming because of what COULD have happened. But if we look back, I don't think any of these things changed the final outcome or death toll at all.There were many healthcare systems errors from WHO, CDC, HHS, to local government. Lack of supplies, to testing , to mechanical vents (ie NYC) to antibiotic shortages , etc.
This is due to multiple administrations and state deficiency supply and resource errors. We all know this...
The key is to learn from system errors and fix it, not to politicize it. You don’t like Tweety Trump great, fix the system basement Biden .
look at chart Doctodd posted and you will answer your questionWhy bring up other states than the one you specifically mentioned?
There was so “surplus” in Cali and financially they aren’t “on track” and won’t be any time soon.
I agree with you that the area under the curve, or Infection fatality rate (IFR) , was never going to reduce unless an antiviral or vaccine was created rapidly(too slow IMO due to lack of emphasis on innovation and more on affordability-another issue of course).I think the CDC testing flaws, and vent shortage and other things you mentioned were alarming because of what COULD have happened. But if we look back, I don't think any of these things changed the final outcome or death toll at all.
Conclusions The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 can vary substantially across different locations and this may reflect differences in population age structure and case-mix of infected and deceased patients as well as multiple other factors. Estimates of infection fatality rates inferred from seroprevalence studies tend to be much lower than original speculations made in the early days of the pandemic.
There was a stockpile for such a disaster that got used during Obama’s reign. He failed to restock it after H1N1 I believe.... sorry just now seeing the previous post. Disregard my commentI agree with you that the area under the curve, or Infection fatality rate (IFR) , was never going to reduce unless an antiviral or vaccine was created rapidly(too slow IMO due to lack of emphasis on innovation and more on affordability-another issue of course).
However, with our primitive tools of face masks, social distancing and last resort mechanical ventilation, it’s pretty scary that NYC was not prepared.... I mean shouldn’t major metropolitan cities expect a chemical warfare attack and need for vents and ICUs??
more on IFR:
![]()
Stanford study suggests coronavirus might not be as deadly as flu
The Stanford study suggests that COVID-19 might not, after all, be more deadly than flu — although, as Ioannidis notes, the profile is very differentspectator.us
interesting article, but more interesting supposition by the reporters - ie headline is misleading.
the original author did not suggest that it was more or less deadly than the seasonal flu.
he did suggest that the fatality rate appears lower than original predictions.
in terms of volume - I personally lost only a little volume, as I am not procedure heavy, and ended up using telemedicine a lot. had fewer no shows, because i had to wake up people for their telemed visit...
in a way, I'm glad back to seeing people in the office, so I don't have to see as many ppl in their "pajamas".
Got my reports in for April. We actually had the most office visits ever in my practice in April. I guess I was giving away 100 visits every month due to patient issues (sick, funeral, out of state) etc. I did several Telemed visits on patients that were in the hospital. I had about 10 patients that would have no showed Monday for instance (my staff didn’t give them their reminder call) that I was able to recapture with telemed.
1/2 telemed, 1/2 actual visits now.So you are not doing tele med visits anymore?
he did try to restock the stockpile. he asked. unfortunately, the Tea Party shot down his requests. he even reduced the sums that he requested in an attempt to get them to agree, to no avail.There was a stockpile for such a disaster that got used during Obama’s reign. He failed to restock it after H1N1 I believe.... sorry just now seeing the previous post. Disregard my comment