- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 28,892
- Solutions
- 2
- Reaction score
- 54,215
- Points
- 9,591
- Academic Administration
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hey LizzyM!
You have a lot of questions and I don't want to make you answer a question I'm sure you've heard 1000 times so I'll make it quick. If a student at a top 30 university has a legitimate reason for having a lower GPA freshman year (3.3-3.4 and the reason involves some personal circumstances), but then sophomore year did much better (3.9 including an A in o-chem both semesters), does this make the admissions committee view sophomore year and later GPAs as more important, or is there still a heavy emphasis on freshman year.
Also, freshman year included gen chem and bio - soph year included o-chem and physics.
An upward trend is always nice. Not as nice as a flat 3.95 but nice enough. No need to explain. Many people have a rocky freshman year. What's particularly nice is not seeing a drop in the year you take o-chem. That is all to common. 🙁

...anyways I thought I was done here. I never sent them an update about what I am doing this year, but on my application I said I was going to be doing one thing this year. Turns out I'm not doing that, I'm doing something else. Should I bring this up at the interview. Are they going to call me a liar?