Thanks again for your response!
For ATSU-SOMA, essentially students stay at the main school for one year before heading off into Community Centers across the US. The immersion into various types of communities is what I think made it an attraction to the consortium. The only issue with this was that I spoke with a 4th year there and they said being so far away from the schools makes it very hard to navigate or troubleshoot if there are issues with the rotation.
That can be a challenge under the best of circumstances. In the end nothing replaces a competent, dedicated, and adequately resourced support staff. I had a very traditional M3 experience, to the point of it being calcified. Troubleshooting meant stay out of trouble or you might face a firing squad.
AlteredScale said:
For clerkship year and fourth year, how detailed is your school when it comes to evaluating the quality of the rotations? I know LCME standards state that essentially every type of patient and procedure the student will be exposed to is described but what are some other ways of evaluating the clinical experience?
That issue is a little outside my realm, but typically there is a review of student evaluations, including narrative comments, student logs to make sure the procedure/encounter list is reasonable, and shelf exam scores. It is generally easier to manage the quality of core clerkships rather than electives.
AlteredScale said:
Also, LCME seems to have student representation on the committee. COCA does not. What's the benefit of having student representation in the accrediting process and what would be a good way of expressing interest to have student representation in COCA?
Large committees with expansive representation, like the LCME, are usually constructed that way to add legitimacy to the decisions that are rendered. Whether or not that is a primary driver of having students serve on the LCME I cannot say with certainty, but it is my presumption.
There are, of course, other benefits to student representation, something I know from my time as an adcom. They bring a different perspective to things, and it is good to give potential future leaders a chance to see what is behind the curtain.
To get COCA to do something similar, SOMA might try to organize a multi-school petition in favor of the idea, and then present it to the accrediting body as a win-win proposal. They may respond favorably to a calm, cohesive, reasoned approach.