I've had my disagreements with crys20 and have even taken offense to some of her comments about those who choose to go the Caribbean route instead of the DO route, foreign medical education and foreign medical graduates. However, some of the points crys20 brings up are valid.
brendang, I remember you mentioned that many schools would not interview you for ophthalmology despite your solid record (
here and
here) . I think it's misleading when you say that going to a Caribbean med school was "not a major obstacle in attaining a residency spot in a super-competitive field."
To give the impression that going to the Caribbean will provide no obstacles to prospective students when the match comes around is not accurate. Caribbean students are at a major disadvantage for many of the highly competitive specialties (and yes, this is true for DOs for some allo specialties).
crys20 is correct in saying that DOs are recognized in countries other than the US. You can get that information
here.
crys20, I strongly disagree with your generalization that FMGs/IMGs are not proud of their degrees. You are insulting my relatives that attended the best med schools in their own countries, did US residencies AND highly competitive fellowships at excellent hospitals (Mt. Sinai and a Columbia affiliates). In your comment from another thread, "DOs are more respected than FMGs," what reasoning is there for this? Would it be justified to have less respect for my relatives that were essentially recruited by the United States during Vietnam (due to the urgent need for good English-speaking physicians) that trained in excellent United States residencies and fellowships?
If this lack of respect for FMGs does exist, it exists for no other reason than discrimination and ethnocentrism.
And even if you limit your negative comment about FMGs to Caribbean graduates, is that really fair? While some applicants matriculate to US osteopathic schools because they choose to even if they were accepted at US allopathic schools, there is a significant portion that would have gone to allopathic medical schools instead. There are Caribbean students who were accepted at osteopathic schools who chose the Caribbean for whatever reason. Sure, some want that MD.
But do you have to be so negative toward people who choose the Caribbean because they prefer the MD degree over the DO degree? Do you have to question their desires and motivations to be physicians just because they would prefer an MD degree? It is possible to want the MD degree (for whatever reason) and still have the genuine desire to be an excellent clinician as well as humanitarian motivations. The negative and defensive comments I see from the pre-osteopathic SDN users about those who choose to go to the Caribbean are unfair and judgmental.
brendang, crys20 also has a point in noticing that you seem to want to hide your degree from Saba. Are you not proud of it? Your comment that, "Most people who graduate from a Caribbean school don't even post their diploma in their office..." is unfortunate. I think Caribbean graduates who feel they must hide their education are simply insecure.
All the docs I know don't care whether they're working with an FMG, a DO, or a US MD; they care that the one they're working with is a good clinician.
By that same reasoning crys20, your statement seems to have the same attitude ("At least at a DO school you can say you just wanted to be a DO for whatever reason..."). You seem to imply that if you go the DO route you can still hide that you didn't get accepted to a US allo school. If someone says, to use your example, "I went to an osteopathic school for location preference," when in fact the primary reason was because that person was unable to get into a US allopathic school, isn't this person trying to hide something? Why be ashamed of it?
Why can't DOs and FMGs be proud that they have received an education that will allow them to practice the art of medicine as physicians? Who cares if they messed up as premeds if they pick themselves up and become good clinicians? People get so caught up trying to defend their education when this is of very little importance. If some arrogant person belittles your degree, so what? As long as you are happy with the path you've chosen and you're a good physician, it doesn't matter what a couple of bad eggs think.
crys20, I also think that you're making a very unfair and unfounded generalization of the clinical training at the main Caribbean schools (e.g., SGU, Ross, AUC, Saba). What is "shady" about the training? The students rotate at hospitals in the United States. If you were talking about some school that had all sorts licensure problems with its graduates and doesn't have solid affiliate hospitals, then yeah, you'd have a point. But your blanketed generalization that off-shore schools have shady training is simply not fair.
I saw this thread earlier and I was going to try to avoid it altogether, but now that I've made it clear that I'm not really on either of your sides, I guess I can expect to be flamed by both sides any minute now!
P.S. I do agree 100% with lmbebo