- Joined
- Apr 6, 2007
- Messages
- 10,827
- Reaction score
- 5,612
- Points
- 5,641
- Psychologist
Is there any document that has the "average" Ph.D funding stipend. Maybe at least a range for "fully funded" programs?
10-15 years ago I want to say an "average" might have been around 20k?
I'm very skeptical that the average is 20k now, much less 15 years ago.Is there any document that has the "average" Ph.D funding stipend. Maybe at least a range for "fully funded" programs?
10-15 years ago I want to say an "average" might have been around 20k?
10-15 years ago I want to say an "average" might have been around 20k?
Yeah. Most of the programs I am looking at are in the high teens, nowhere in the mid to high 20s.
When I was in grad school in the mid-late 90s they paid us a around 11k/yr. (or maybe it was 9k) and I remember some fellow grad students did some investigation into food stamps and other forms of welfare only to discover that our stipend placed us *just barely above* the level that would allow us to apply for food stamps and other forms of assistance. So I would imagine that the formula of 1.01 x [income that would qualify for food stamp assistance in your state] would be a good guess.Is there any document that has the "average" Ph.D funding stipend. Maybe at least a range for "fully funded" programs?
10-15 years ago I want to say an "average" might have been around 20k?
This is old data, limited number of responses received, and only from clinical psych programs, but might give a little sense of what you are looking for? Pages 15-18 specifically ask about the amount of stipend/tuition remission details.Ugh...ok.
So no document with the info? And "average" may not be good/representative metric? Got it. Thanks all who chimed in.
We were (they still are) unionized as grad students. We were actually part of the United Auto Workers! The folks in the pictures in the newsletter DID NOT look like intro to psych TAs!And this is just one of the many reasons why we need to unionize grad students.
Interesting. If I’m reading it correctly, it only applies to private non-profit institutions.on a related note.
Regulations.gov
www.regulations.gov
I'll just leave this here in case anyone wants to leave a public comment.
We were unionized also.We were (they still are) unionized as grad students. We were actually part of the United Auto Workers! The folks in the pictures in the newsletter DID NOT look like intro to psych TAs!
Thats really ****ty 🙁When I was in grad school in the mid-late 90s they paid us a around 11k/yr. (or maybe it was 9k) and I remember some fellow grad students did some investigation into food stamps and other forms of welfare only to discover that our stipend placed us *just barely above* the level that would allow us to apply for food stamps and other forms of assistance. So I would imagine that the formula of 1.01 x [income that would qualify for food stamp assistance in your state] would be a good guess.
Thats really ****ty 🙁
For those with higher stipends is it based on funding/research, etc or guaranteed money? I had higher offers that were not a guarantee for all years vs my program that did guarantee funding for all years enrolled.
PhD chem. 22K/year in Richmond, VA. Different though since I was fully funded by my PI as a research assistant - did not have to TA.Is there any document that has the "average" Ph.D funding stipend. Maybe at least a range for "fully funded" programs?
10-15 years ago I want to say an "average" might have been around 20k?
TA guaranteed first 3 years, but anyone who needed it basically got it for fourth year (back in the stone ages, most of us went on internship after fourth year. After 2nd year, most of us had paid practicum that qualified us for tuition waiver, and also were funded as RAs through our mentor’s labs. Rare to TA in 3rd-4th year unless you wanted to. There were always more TA slots than grad students who needed/wanted to do them. Summer funding was available if needed through internal and external practicum.For those with higher stipends is it based on funding/research, etc or guaranteed money? I had higher offers that were not a guarantee for all years vs my program that did guarantee funding for all years enrolled.
same here!Graduated a little over 4 years ago (wow it feels like much longer than that...)
Fwiw, my living expenses were very low in grad school and I never felt pressed for money. Plus I was double-funded my first year and so started a nest egg. Postdoc in a high COL city on the other hand...Thanks everyone! I am appreciative of the responses. I was not aware of such a range for so-call "fully funded" programs. I am somewhat shocked to hear such a low stipend for some program, as well as how little it really has has grown in 15 years. For some comparison, the federal GS-13 step one has been raised almost 18K in the last 15 years.
I'm not shocked at all. Stipend, tuition waivers, insurance, etc, makes grad students somewhat expensive for what they bring in monetarily. And, with federal and state monies that go to higher ed dropping year over year, what alternative is there?Thanks everyone! I am appreciative of the responses. I was not aware of such a range for so-call "fully funded" programs. I am somewhat shocked to hear such a low stipend for some program, as well as how little it really has has grown in 15 years. For some comparison, the federal GS-13 step one has been raised almost 18K in the last 15 years.
One alternative has been to simply take less students into funded programs. My old school was taking 6-7 per cohort around the beginning of the century, and now it looks like they take more like 4-5 per cohort, with recent years only taking 2 or 3. Funding hasn't kept up with inflation a, but it has risen reasonably.I'm not shocked at all. Stipend, tuition waivers, insurance, etc, makes grad students somewhat expensive for what they bring in monetarily. And, with federal and state monies that go to higher ed dropping year over year, what alternative is there?
Considering the saturation of the market and declining jobs in certain areas (e.g., therapy jobs in institutional settings), smaller cohorts could be a good thing.One alternative has been to simply take less students into funded programs. My old school was taking 6-7 per cohort around the beginning of the century, and now it looks like they take more like 4-5 per cohort, with recent years only taking 2 or 3. Funding hasn't kept up with inflation a, but it has risen reasonably.
Considering the saturation of the market and declining jobs in certain areas (e.g., therapy jobs in institutional settings), smaller cohorts could be a good thing.
Maybe still interesting to some? From the 2009 APPIC survey, for your reading pleasure:Wow, according to that, my first-year stipend would've been at about the 2nd percentile. Then again, this was over a decade ago. I think it's gone up a few thousand in the interim.
From the 2009 APPIC survey, for your reading pleasure:
29. Please enter the approximate amount of the annual stipend /
salary for your position (e.g., if your stipend is $12,000
for the year, enter "12000"; if unfunded, enter "0"). Please
estimate if you don't know the exact amount.
Mean = $23,396 Median = $23,000
SD = $ 8,990 Mode = $24,000
The mean salary represents a 2.6% increase as compared to 2008.