- Joined
- Aug 18, 2007
- Messages
- 560
- Reaction score
- 4
Just curious (I'm sure it has happened) and what made the interview "bad" in your opinion?
Interviewer started off by explaining to me how difficult the program was and how driven and motivated students in this program needed to be to succeed. This went on for about 10 minutes with me simply nodding politely and uttering occasional one syllable words, you know, the whole active listening bit.
All of a sudden he turns to me and goes on a rant about the three types of premed students he sees at interviews: the ones who genuinely like the "mundane like of a GP", those who pretned to genuinely like the life as a GP, and those who just want to be doctors after having some sort of enlightening experience as an 8 year old in the backyard with frog guts. He then asks me which one I am.
I say I'm a hybrid of the first and third premed, to which he responds, "I don't believe you. You're entire application lacks passion for any aspect of a career in medicine. I spent last night reading your file and only saw a misplaced sense of compassion for terminally ill patients."
2 weeks later I got accepted.
Interviewer started off by explaining to me how difficult the program was and how driven and motivated students in this program needed to be to succeed. This went on for about 10 minutes with me simply nodding politely and uttering occasional one syllable words, you know, the whole active listening bit.
All of a sudden he turns to me and goes on a rant about the three types of premed students he sees at interviews: the ones who genuinely like the "mundane like of a GP", those who pretned to genuinely like the life as a GP, and those who just want to be doctors after having some sort of enlightening experience as an 8 year old in the backyard with frog guts. He then asks me which one I am.
I say I'm a hybrid of the first and third premed, to which he responds, "I don't believe you. You're entire application lacks passion for any aspect of a career in medicine. I spent last night reading your file and only saw a misplaced sense of compassion for terminally ill patients."
2 weeks later I got accepted.
Dude, that's the BEST interview experience. I have yet to see anybody getting grilled like that and NOT get accepted, unless the person just breaks down or something. I think interviewers do this only when they're pretty much sure they're gonna accept you, and the only thing left is to make sure that you can handle trying situations.
Interviewer started off by explaining to me how difficult the program was and how driven and motivated students in this program needed to be to succeed. This went on for about 10 minutes with me simply nodding politely and uttering occasional one syllable words, you know, the whole active listening bit.
All of a sudden he turns to me and goes on a rant about the three types of premed students he sees at interviews: the ones who genuinely like the "mundane like of a GP", those who pretned to genuinely like the life as a GP, and those who just want to be doctors after having some sort of enlightening experience as an 8 year old in the backyard with frog guts. He then asks me which one I am.
I say I'm a hybrid of the first and third premed, to which he responds, "I don't believe you. You're entire application lacks passion for any aspect of a career in medicine. I spent last night reading your file and only saw a misplaced sense of compassion for terminally ill patients."
2 weeks later I got accepted.
Dude, that's the BEST interview experience. I have yet to see anybody getting grilled like that and NOT get accepted, unless the person just breaks down or something. I think interviewers do this only when they're pretty much sure they're gonna accept you, and the only thing left is to make sure that you can handle trying situations.
Sounds to me like a classic "stress interview" where the purpose is to fluster you or get you on the defensive. There was no right or wrong answer, the important point was that you kept your cool, and didn't argue or lose your temper.Interviewer started off by explaining to me how difficult the program was and how driven and motivated students in this program needed to be to succeed. This went on for about 10 minutes with me simply nodding politely and uttering occasional one syllable words, you know, the whole active listening bit.
All of a sudden he turns to me and goes on a rant about the three types of premed students he sees at interviews: the ones who genuinely like the "mundane like of a GP", those who pretned to genuinely like the life as a GP, and those who just want to be doctors after having some sort of enlightening experience as an 8 year old in the backyard with frog guts. He then asks me which one I am.
I say I'm a hybrid of the first and third premed, to which he responds, "I don't believe you. You're entire application lacks passion for any aspect of a career in medicine. I spent last night reading your file and only saw a misplaced sense of compassion for terminally ill patients."
2 weeks later I got accepted.
Sounds to me like a classic "stress interview" where the purpose is to fluster you or get you on the defensive. There was no right or wrong answer, the important point was that you kept your cool, and didn't argue or lose your temper.
As was mentioned above, short of a horrendous interview, there's really no telling exactly how well things went in the eyes of your evaluator. A really smooth interview where you think you gave good answers without any verbal missteps might have simply been one where the interviewer didn't ask enough meaningful questions to really make you think (and thus, afterward, didn't have that much to really write about in your evaluation). Likewise, a tricky interview might have just involved some difficult questions that you maneuvered through well overall.
I interview very polished speakers who I find extremely bland and some nervous kids who stumble a few times - and thus probably leave the room thinking things went terribly - who really impress me. So don't stress about a 'bad' interview.
Sounds to me like a classic "stress interview" where the purpose is to fluster you or get you on the defensive. There was no right or wrong answer, the important point was that you kept your cool, and didn't argue or lose your temper.
I didn't use my frog guts experience in my PS, but you've got me wondering if this is such a common inclusion in PSs that it's a cliche for interviewers.
You never know how an interview really went. You don't know if the interviewer is going to remember that one stupid thing you said or is going to dwell on the one brilliant thing you said.
I felt like the interviews that ended up with acceptances were pretty middle-of-the-road for me. I had other interviews where I really knocked the interview out of the ballpark, and at those schools I also had competitive GPA/MCAT and some fairly unique ECs, but they didn't accept me (got waitlisted). You never know how it's going to end up. Just do as well as you can.